Cargando…

Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation

BACKGROUND: This study compared whole blood dilution versus density gradient centrifugation for pre‐processing blood samples prior to circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture on the efficiency of CTC separation by size‐based isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from a healthy volunteer spiked w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Tianhao, Li, Sheng, Wei, Liang, Huang, Shaoyi, Xue, Yan, Cui, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24524
_version_ 1784746524599648256
author Fu, Tianhao
Li, Sheng
Wei, Liang
Huang, Shaoyi
Xue, Yan
Cui, Kai
author_facet Fu, Tianhao
Li, Sheng
Wei, Liang
Huang, Shaoyi
Xue, Yan
Cui, Kai
author_sort Fu, Tianhao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compared whole blood dilution versus density gradient centrifugation for pre‐processing blood samples prior to circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture on the efficiency of CTC separation by size‐based isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from a healthy volunteer spiked with SKBR3 cells was used to optimize the whole blood dilution protocol for sample volume, dilution ratio, and paraformaldehyde (PFA) concentration. Whole blood from healthy volunteers spiked with SKBR3, A549, or PC3 cells, and whole blood from patients with advanced gastric, esophageal, or liver cancer, was used to compare pre‐processing by the optimal whole blood dilution protocol with density‐gradient centrifugation. All statistical evaluations were performed using Student t test of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 17.0). RESULTS: In blood samples from healthy volunteers, spiked SKBR3 cell recovery rates were highest in 5 ml of whole blood, diluted with 2.5 ml buffer, and fixed with 0.2% PFA, and spiked SKBR3, A549, and PC3 cell recovery rates from 5 ml whole blood were significantly greater when using the optimized whole blood dilution protocol (87.67% ± 1.76%, 79.50% ± 0.50% and 71.83% ± 1.04%, respectively) compared to density‐gradient centrifugation (46.83 ± 1.76%, 37.00 ± 1.50% and 41.00 ± 1.50%, respectively).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9279958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92799582022-07-15 Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation Fu, Tianhao Li, Sheng Wei, Liang Huang, Shaoyi Xue, Yan Cui, Kai J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: This study compared whole blood dilution versus density gradient centrifugation for pre‐processing blood samples prior to circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture on the efficiency of CTC separation by size‐based isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood from a healthy volunteer spiked with SKBR3 cells was used to optimize the whole blood dilution protocol for sample volume, dilution ratio, and paraformaldehyde (PFA) concentration. Whole blood from healthy volunteers spiked with SKBR3, A549, or PC3 cells, and whole blood from patients with advanced gastric, esophageal, or liver cancer, was used to compare pre‐processing by the optimal whole blood dilution protocol with density‐gradient centrifugation. All statistical evaluations were performed using Student t test of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 17.0). RESULTS: In blood samples from healthy volunteers, spiked SKBR3 cell recovery rates were highest in 5 ml of whole blood, diluted with 2.5 ml buffer, and fixed with 0.2% PFA, and spiked SKBR3, A549, and PC3 cell recovery rates from 5 ml whole blood were significantly greater when using the optimized whole blood dilution protocol (87.67% ± 1.76%, 79.50% ± 0.50% and 71.83% ± 1.04%, respectively) compared to density‐gradient centrifugation (46.83 ± 1.76%, 37.00 ± 1.50% and 41.00 ± 1.50%, respectively). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9279958/ /pubmed/35657145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24524 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Fu, Tianhao
Li, Sheng
Wei, Liang
Huang, Shaoyi
Xue, Yan
Cui, Kai
Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title_full Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title_fullStr Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title_full_unstemmed Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title_short Optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
title_sort optimal whole blood dilution protocol for preprocessing samples prior to circulating tumor cell capture by size‐based isolation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9279958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24524
work_keys_str_mv AT futianhao optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation
AT lisheng optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation
AT weiliang optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation
AT huangshaoyi optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation
AT xueyan optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation
AT cuikai optimalwholeblooddilutionprotocolforpreprocessingsamplespriortocirculatingtumorcellcapturebysizebasedisolation