Cargando…

Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION: Non-physician performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a diagnostic adjunct with the potential to enhance current practice. The scope of POCUS utility is broad and well-established in-hospital, yet limited research has occurred in the out-of-hospital environment. Many...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burton, Samuel O., Donovan, Jake K., Jones, Samuel L., Meadley, Benjamin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9280064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X22000796
_version_ 1784746551274373120
author Burton, Samuel O.
Donovan, Jake K.
Jones, Samuel L.
Meadley, Benjamin N.
author_facet Burton, Samuel O.
Donovan, Jake K.
Jones, Samuel L.
Meadley, Benjamin N.
author_sort Burton, Samuel O.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Non-physician performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a diagnostic adjunct with the potential to enhance current practice. The scope of POCUS utility is broad and well-established in-hospital, yet limited research has occurred in the out-of-hospital environment. Many physician-based studies expound the value of POCUS in the acute setting as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool. This study utilized a scoping review methodology to map the literature pertaining to non-physician use of POCUS to improve success of peripheral intravenous access (PIVA), especially in patients predicted to be difficult to cannulate. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from January 1, 1990 through April 15, 2021. A thorough search of the grey literature and reference lists of relevant articles was also performed to identify additional studies. Articles were included if they examined non-physician utilization of ultrasound-guided PIVA (USGPIVA) for patients anticipated to be difficult to cannulate. RESULTS: A total of 158 articles were identified. A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants had varied experience with ultrasound, making accurate comparison difficult. Training and education were non-standardized, as was the approach to determining difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Despite this, the majority of the studies demonstrated high first attempt and overall success rates for PIVA performed by non-physicians. CONCLUSION: Non-physician USGPIVA appears to be a superior method for PIVA when difficulty is anticipated. Additional benefits include reduced requirement for central venous catheter (CVC) or intraosseous (IO) needle placement. Paramedics, nurses, and emergency department (ED) technicians are able to achieve competence in this skill with relatively little training. Further research is required to explore the utility of this practice in the out-of-hospital environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9280064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92800642022-07-29 Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review Burton, Samuel O. Donovan, Jake K. Jones, Samuel L. Meadley, Benjamin N. Prehosp Disaster Med Research Report INTRODUCTION: Non-physician performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a diagnostic adjunct with the potential to enhance current practice. The scope of POCUS utility is broad and well-established in-hospital, yet limited research has occurred in the out-of-hospital environment. Many physician-based studies expound the value of POCUS in the acute setting as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool. This study utilized a scoping review methodology to map the literature pertaining to non-physician use of POCUS to improve success of peripheral intravenous access (PIVA), especially in patients predicted to be difficult to cannulate. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from January 1, 1990 through April 15, 2021. A thorough search of the grey literature and reference lists of relevant articles was also performed to identify additional studies. Articles were included if they examined non-physician utilization of ultrasound-guided PIVA (USGPIVA) for patients anticipated to be difficult to cannulate. RESULTS: A total of 158 articles were identified. A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants had varied experience with ultrasound, making accurate comparison difficult. Training and education were non-standardized, as was the approach to determining difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Despite this, the majority of the studies demonstrated high first attempt and overall success rates for PIVA performed by non-physicians. CONCLUSION: Non-physician USGPIVA appears to be a superior method for PIVA when difficulty is anticipated. Additional benefits include reduced requirement for central venous catheter (CVC) or intraosseous (IO) needle placement. Paramedics, nurses, and emergency department (ED) technicians are able to achieve competence in this skill with relatively little training. Further research is required to explore the utility of this practice in the out-of-hospital environment. Cambridge University Press 2022-08 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9280064/ /pubmed/35593145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X22000796 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Report
Burton, Samuel O.
Donovan, Jake K.
Jones, Samuel L.
Meadley, Benjamin N.
Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title_full Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title_short Can Non-Physician Providers Use Ultrasound to Aid in Establishing Peripheral IV Access in Patients Who are Difficult to Cannulate? A Scoping Review
title_sort can non-physician providers use ultrasound to aid in establishing peripheral iv access in patients who are difficult to cannulate? a scoping review
topic Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9280064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35593145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X22000796
work_keys_str_mv AT burtonsamuelo cannonphysicianprovidersuseultrasoundtoaidinestablishingperipheralivaccessinpatientswhoaredifficulttocannulateascopingreview
AT donovanjakek cannonphysicianprovidersuseultrasoundtoaidinestablishingperipheralivaccessinpatientswhoaredifficulttocannulateascopingreview
AT jonessamuell cannonphysicianprovidersuseultrasoundtoaidinestablishingperipheralivaccessinpatientswhoaredifficulttocannulateascopingreview
AT meadleybenjaminn cannonphysicianprovidersuseultrasoundtoaidinestablishingperipheralivaccessinpatientswhoaredifficulttocannulateascopingreview