Cargando…

Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study

BACKGROUND: Several devices have been developed to measure implant-bone stability as an indicator of successful implant treatment; these include Osstell®, which measures the implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the more recent AnyCheck®, which relies on percussion for the implant stability test (IS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okuhama, Yurie, Nagata, Koudai, Kim, Hyunjin, Tsuruoka, Hayato, Atsumi, Mihoko, Kawana, Hiromasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0
_version_ 1784746787785932800
author Okuhama, Yurie
Nagata, Koudai
Kim, Hyunjin
Tsuruoka, Hayato
Atsumi, Mihoko
Kawana, Hiromasa
author_facet Okuhama, Yurie
Nagata, Koudai
Kim, Hyunjin
Tsuruoka, Hayato
Atsumi, Mihoko
Kawana, Hiromasa
author_sort Okuhama, Yurie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several devices have been developed to measure implant-bone stability as an indicator of successful implant treatment; these include Osstell®, which measures the implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the more recent AnyCheck®, which relies on percussion for the implant stability test (IST). These devices make it possible to measure implant stability. However, no studies have compared the performance of AnyCheck® and Osstell® (i.e., IST and ISQ values) in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the correlation between primary and secondary implant stability using the Osstell® and AnyCheck® devices. METHODS: Ten patients (7 women; age [mean ± standard deviation]: 49.1 ± 13.3 years) with partially edentulous jaws who received a total of 15 implants were included. IST (AnyCheck®) and ISQ (Osstell®) values were measured immediately after implantation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks post-implantation. Each measurement was performed three times, and the average value was used as the result. The correlation between measurements obtained using the two devices was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The IST values ranged from 79.1 ± 2.87 to 82.4 ± 2.65. The ISQ values ranged from 76.0 ± 2.8 to 80.2 ± 2.35. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was r = 0.64 immediately after implantation, r = 0.29 at 1 week, r = 0.68 at 2 weeks, r = 0.53 at 3 weeks, r = 0.68 at 4 weeks, and r = 0.56 at 6 weeks. A positive correlation was found in all cases, except at week 1 when the correlation was weak; the IST and ISQ values decreased the most during the first postoperative week and increased during the second week. The IST values were also slightly higher at all measurement points. CONCLUSION: The ability to assess implant stability without removing the abutment during healing is essential for determining the timing of loading without the risk of bone resorption. The results of this study suggest that AnyCheck® is useful for determining primary and secondary implant stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92810382022-07-15 Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study Okuhama, Yurie Nagata, Koudai Kim, Hyunjin Tsuruoka, Hayato Atsumi, Mihoko Kawana, Hiromasa BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Several devices have been developed to measure implant-bone stability as an indicator of successful implant treatment; these include Osstell®, which measures the implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the more recent AnyCheck®, which relies on percussion for the implant stability test (IST). These devices make it possible to measure implant stability. However, no studies have compared the performance of AnyCheck® and Osstell® (i.e., IST and ISQ values) in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the correlation between primary and secondary implant stability using the Osstell® and AnyCheck® devices. METHODS: Ten patients (7 women; age [mean ± standard deviation]: 49.1 ± 13.3 years) with partially edentulous jaws who received a total of 15 implants were included. IST (AnyCheck®) and ISQ (Osstell®) values were measured immediately after implantation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks post-implantation. Each measurement was performed three times, and the average value was used as the result. The correlation between measurements obtained using the two devices was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The IST values ranged from 79.1 ± 2.87 to 82.4 ± 2.65. The ISQ values ranged from 76.0 ± 2.8 to 80.2 ± 2.35. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was r = 0.64 immediately after implantation, r = 0.29 at 1 week, r = 0.68 at 2 weeks, r = 0.53 at 3 weeks, r = 0.68 at 4 weeks, and r = 0.56 at 6 weeks. A positive correlation was found in all cases, except at week 1 when the correlation was weak; the IST and ISQ values decreased the most during the first postoperative week and increased during the second week. The IST values were also slightly higher at all measurement points. CONCLUSION: The ability to assess implant stability without removing the abutment during healing is essential for determining the timing of loading without the risk of bone resorption. The results of this study suggest that AnyCheck® is useful for determining primary and secondary implant stability. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281038/ /pubmed/35836169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Okuhama, Yurie
Nagata, Koudai
Kim, Hyunjin
Tsuruoka, Hayato
Atsumi, Mihoko
Kawana, Hiromasa
Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title_full Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title_fullStr Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title_short Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
title_sort validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0
work_keys_str_mv AT okuhamayurie validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy
AT nagatakoudai validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy
AT kimhyunjin validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy
AT tsuruokahayato validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy
AT atsumimihoko validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy
AT kawanahiromasa validationofanimplantstabilitymeasurementdeviceusingthepercussionresponseaclinicalresearchstudy