Cargando…

Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model

BACKGROUND: Administration of antineoplastic drugs may cause azoospermia driving to subfertility. Production of animal azoospermia models is essential for evaluating new treatment methods before therapeutic interventions in human setup. This study aimed to investigate the toxic effects of Busulfan (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mobarak, Halimeh, Rahbarghazi, Reza, Nouri, Mohammad, Heidarpour, Mohammad, Mahdipour, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00587-1
_version_ 1784746805512110080
author Mobarak, Halimeh
Rahbarghazi, Reza
Nouri, Mohammad
Heidarpour, Mohammad
Mahdipour, Mahdi
author_facet Mobarak, Halimeh
Rahbarghazi, Reza
Nouri, Mohammad
Heidarpour, Mohammad
Mahdipour, Mahdi
author_sort Mobarak, Halimeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Administration of antineoplastic drugs may cause azoospermia driving to subfertility. Production of animal azoospermia models is essential for evaluating new treatment methods before therapeutic interventions in human setup. This study aimed to investigate the toxic effects of Busulfan (an anticancer drug) on some vital organs and describe the best method and appropriate dose of Busulfan to induce an animal azoospermia model. METHODS: Rats were randomly assigned into four groups, treatment groups received 10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg Busulfan intraperitoneally (IP), 5 mg/kg Busulfan intratesticular (IT), and control group. Blood, bone marrow, liver, renal, and testes samples were collected for histological (H&E staining), biochemical (serum levels of ALT, AST, ALP, creatinine, and urea), and hematological analyses. RESULTS: Results revealed severe anemia and leukopenia in rats that received Busulfan via IP. By contrast, injection of 5 mg/kg Busulfan via IT did not cause anemia except with a mild decrease in RBC count. Non-significant differences in the M/E ratio were observed in all groups. The administration of 40 mg/kg of Busulfan led to evacuation and destruction in the spermatogenesis process with thin-walled seminiferous epithelium in most tubules, but in rats treated with 10 mg/kg of Busulfan, the normal spermatogenesis process was notified. IT injection of Busulfan contributed to the complete degradation of spermatogenesis in which all spermatogenic cells degenerated. In the renal tissue, hyperemia, extensive tubular necrosis degeneration, and hyaline casts were found after IP injection of Busulfan. In hepatic tissue, focal hemorrhagic, chronic cholangitis, and hepatocyte degeneration, and swelling were noticed. Biochemical analysis revealed apparent Busulfan toxicity of both hepatic and renal tissues in IP Busulfan-treated rats. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we found that the intratesticular injection of low doses of Busulfan (5 mg/kg) is a relatively non-invasive and safe method for producing the rat azoospermia model causing the least toxicity on vital organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92811072022-07-15 Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model Mobarak, Halimeh Rahbarghazi, Reza Nouri, Mohammad Heidarpour, Mohammad Mahdipour, Mahdi BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Administration of antineoplastic drugs may cause azoospermia driving to subfertility. Production of animal azoospermia models is essential for evaluating new treatment methods before therapeutic interventions in human setup. This study aimed to investigate the toxic effects of Busulfan (an anticancer drug) on some vital organs and describe the best method and appropriate dose of Busulfan to induce an animal azoospermia model. METHODS: Rats were randomly assigned into four groups, treatment groups received 10 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg Busulfan intraperitoneally (IP), 5 mg/kg Busulfan intratesticular (IT), and control group. Blood, bone marrow, liver, renal, and testes samples were collected for histological (H&E staining), biochemical (serum levels of ALT, AST, ALP, creatinine, and urea), and hematological analyses. RESULTS: Results revealed severe anemia and leukopenia in rats that received Busulfan via IP. By contrast, injection of 5 mg/kg Busulfan via IT did not cause anemia except with a mild decrease in RBC count. Non-significant differences in the M/E ratio were observed in all groups. The administration of 40 mg/kg of Busulfan led to evacuation and destruction in the spermatogenesis process with thin-walled seminiferous epithelium in most tubules, but in rats treated with 10 mg/kg of Busulfan, the normal spermatogenesis process was notified. IT injection of Busulfan contributed to the complete degradation of spermatogenesis in which all spermatogenic cells degenerated. In the renal tissue, hyperemia, extensive tubular necrosis degeneration, and hyaline casts were found after IP injection of Busulfan. In hepatic tissue, focal hemorrhagic, chronic cholangitis, and hepatocyte degeneration, and swelling were noticed. Biochemical analysis revealed apparent Busulfan toxicity of both hepatic and renal tissues in IP Busulfan-treated rats. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we found that the intratesticular injection of low doses of Busulfan (5 mg/kg) is a relatively non-invasive and safe method for producing the rat azoospermia model causing the least toxicity on vital organs. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281107/ /pubmed/35831882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00587-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mobarak, Halimeh
Rahbarghazi, Reza
Nouri, Mohammad
Heidarpour, Mohammad
Mahdipour, Mahdi
Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title_full Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title_fullStr Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title_full_unstemmed Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title_short Intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of Busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
title_sort intratesticular versus intraperitoneal injection of busulfan for the induction of azoospermia in a rat model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40360-022-00587-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mobarakhalimeh intratesticularversusintraperitonealinjectionofbusulfanfortheinductionofazoospermiainaratmodel
AT rahbarghazireza intratesticularversusintraperitonealinjectionofbusulfanfortheinductionofazoospermiainaratmodel
AT nourimohammad intratesticularversusintraperitonealinjectionofbusulfanfortheinductionofazoospermiainaratmodel
AT heidarpourmohammad intratesticularversusintraperitonealinjectionofbusulfanfortheinductionofazoospermiainaratmodel
AT mahdipourmahdi intratesticularversusintraperitonealinjectionofbusulfanfortheinductionofazoospermiainaratmodel