Cargando…
The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z |
_version_ | 1784746808515231744 |
---|---|
author | Wiech, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Paweł Mieszkowski, Marcin Tuyakov, Bułat Pituch-Sala, Karolina Czarnik, Tomasz Kurylcio, Andrzej Czuczwar, Mirosław Borys, Michał |
author_facet | Wiech, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Paweł Mieszkowski, Marcin Tuyakov, Bułat Pituch-Sala, Karolina Czarnik, Tomasz Kurylcio, Andrzej Czuczwar, Mirosław Borys, Michał |
author_sort | Wiech, Marcin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed in a university hospital. We randomly allocated patients to one of three groups: ESP, SHAM, and control (CON). Procedures in the ESP and SHAM blocks were performed ipsilaterally with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline (0.4 mL/kg). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the patient’s improvement with quality-of-recovery 40 (QoR-40) a day after surgery. Other outcome assessments included postoperative pain evaluation on the visual analog scale (VAS), 24-hour opioid consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), time to the first opioid demand, and global satisfaction with perioperative treatment. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the ESP group had improved QoR-40 compared to the CON group, 186 [177–193] vs. 175 [165–183] (medians and interquartile ranges). Pain severity was significantly higher in the CON group compared to the ESP group at hours 2 (38 [23–53] vs. 20 [7–32]) and 4 (30 [18–51] vs. 19 [7–25]). Moreover, we observed lower oxycodone consumption after 24 hours with the PCA pump between the ESP (4 [2–8] mg) and the CON (9.5 [5–19]) groups. Patients in the CON group used PCA sooner than those in the ESP group. Participants in the ESP group were more satisfied with treatment than those in the CON group. We found no statistical difference between SHAM and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CON group, the ESP block improved the quality of recovery, alleviated pain intensity, and lowered opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, we did not observe this superiority in comparison with the SHAM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04726878. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9281119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92811192022-07-15 The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial Wiech, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Paweł Mieszkowski, Marcin Tuyakov, Bułat Pituch-Sala, Karolina Czarnik, Tomasz Kurylcio, Andrzej Czuczwar, Mirosław Borys, Michał BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed in a university hospital. We randomly allocated patients to one of three groups: ESP, SHAM, and control (CON). Procedures in the ESP and SHAM blocks were performed ipsilaterally with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline (0.4 mL/kg). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the patient’s improvement with quality-of-recovery 40 (QoR-40) a day after surgery. Other outcome assessments included postoperative pain evaluation on the visual analog scale (VAS), 24-hour opioid consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), time to the first opioid demand, and global satisfaction with perioperative treatment. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the ESP group had improved QoR-40 compared to the CON group, 186 [177–193] vs. 175 [165–183] (medians and interquartile ranges). Pain severity was significantly higher in the CON group compared to the ESP group at hours 2 (38 [23–53] vs. 20 [7–32]) and 4 (30 [18–51] vs. 19 [7–25]). Moreover, we observed lower oxycodone consumption after 24 hours with the PCA pump between the ESP (4 [2–8] mg) and the CON (9.5 [5–19]) groups. Patients in the CON group used PCA sooner than those in the ESP group. Participants in the ESP group were more satisfied with treatment than those in the CON group. We found no statistical difference between SHAM and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CON group, the ESP block improved the quality of recovery, alleviated pain intensity, and lowered opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, we did not observe this superiority in comparison with the SHAM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04726878. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281119/ /pubmed/35836116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wiech, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Paweł Mieszkowski, Marcin Tuyakov, Bułat Pituch-Sala, Karolina Czarnik, Tomasz Kurylcio, Andrzej Czuczwar, Mirosław Borys, Michał The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiechmarcin thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piwowarczykpaweł thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mieszkowskimarcin thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tuyakovbułat thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pituchsalakarolina thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT czarniktomasz thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kurylcioandrzej thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT czuczwarmirosław thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT borysmichał thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wiechmarcin qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT piwowarczykpaweł qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mieszkowskimarcin qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tuyakovbułat qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pituchsalakarolina qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT czarniktomasz qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kurylcioandrzej qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT czuczwarmirosław qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT borysmichał qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |