Cargando…

The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiech, Marcin, Piwowarczyk, Paweł, Mieszkowski, Marcin, Tuyakov, Bułat, Pituch-Sala, Karolina, Czarnik, Tomasz, Kurylcio, Andrzej, Czuczwar, Mirosław, Borys, Michał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z
_version_ 1784746808515231744
author Wiech, Marcin
Piwowarczyk, Paweł
Mieszkowski, Marcin
Tuyakov, Bułat
Pituch-Sala, Karolina
Czarnik, Tomasz
Kurylcio, Andrzej
Czuczwar, Mirosław
Borys, Michał
author_facet Wiech, Marcin
Piwowarczyk, Paweł
Mieszkowski, Marcin
Tuyakov, Bułat
Pituch-Sala, Karolina
Czarnik, Tomasz
Kurylcio, Andrzej
Czuczwar, Mirosław
Borys, Michał
author_sort Wiech, Marcin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed in a university hospital. We randomly allocated patients to one of three groups: ESP, SHAM, and control (CON). Procedures in the ESP and SHAM blocks were performed ipsilaterally with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline (0.4 mL/kg). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the patient’s improvement with quality-of-recovery 40 (QoR-40) a day after surgery. Other outcome assessments included postoperative pain evaluation on the visual analog scale (VAS), 24-hour opioid consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), time to the first opioid demand, and global satisfaction with perioperative treatment. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the ESP group had improved QoR-40 compared to the CON group, 186 [177–193] vs. 175 [165–183] (medians and interquartile ranges). Pain severity was significantly higher in the CON group compared to the ESP group at hours 2 (38 [23–53] vs. 20 [7–32]) and 4 (30 [18–51] vs. 19 [7–25]). Moreover, we observed lower oxycodone consumption after 24 hours with the PCA pump between the ESP (4 [2–8] mg) and the CON (9.5 [5–19]) groups. Patients in the CON group used PCA sooner than those in the ESP group. Participants in the ESP group were more satisfied with treatment than those in the CON group. We found no statistical difference between SHAM and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CON group, the ESP block improved the quality of recovery, alleviated pain intensity, and lowered opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, we did not observe this superiority in comparison with the SHAM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04726878.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92811192022-07-15 The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial Wiech, Marcin Piwowarczyk, Paweł Mieszkowski, Marcin Tuyakov, Bułat Pituch-Sala, Karolina Czarnik, Tomasz Kurylcio, Andrzej Czuczwar, Mirosław Borys, Michał BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently been shown to effectively alleviate postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption in breast surgery patients. However, data are still limited concerning the quality of recovery in patients following this procedure. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed in a university hospital. We randomly allocated patients to one of three groups: ESP, SHAM, and control (CON). Procedures in the ESP and SHAM blocks were performed ipsilaterally with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline (0.4 mL/kg). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the patient’s improvement with quality-of-recovery 40 (QoR-40) a day after surgery. Other outcome assessments included postoperative pain evaluation on the visual analog scale (VAS), 24-hour opioid consumption with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), time to the first opioid demand, and global satisfaction with perioperative treatment. RESULTS: Overall, patients in the ESP group had improved QoR-40 compared to the CON group, 186 [177–193] vs. 175 [165–183] (medians and interquartile ranges). Pain severity was significantly higher in the CON group compared to the ESP group at hours 2 (38 [23–53] vs. 20 [7–32]) and 4 (30 [18–51] vs. 19 [7–25]). Moreover, we observed lower oxycodone consumption after 24 hours with the PCA pump between the ESP (4 [2–8] mg) and the CON (9.5 [5–19]) groups. Patients in the CON group used PCA sooner than those in the ESP group. Participants in the ESP group were more satisfied with treatment than those in the CON group. We found no statistical difference between SHAM and the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the CON group, the ESP block improved the quality of recovery, alleviated pain intensity, and lowered opioid consumption in patients undergoing breast surgery. However, we did not observe this superiority in comparison with the SHAM group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04726878. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281119/ /pubmed/35836116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wiech, Marcin
Piwowarczyk, Paweł
Mieszkowski, Marcin
Tuyakov, Bułat
Pituch-Sala, Karolina
Czarnik, Tomasz
Kurylcio, Andrzej
Czuczwar, Mirosław
Borys, Michał
The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_short The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wiechmarcin thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT piwowarczykpaweł thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mieszkowskimarcin thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tuyakovbułat thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pituchsalakarolina thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT czarniktomasz thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kurylcioandrzej thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT czuczwarmirosław thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT borysmichał thequalityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wiechmarcin qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT piwowarczykpaweł qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mieszkowskimarcin qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tuyakovbułat qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pituchsalakarolina qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT czarniktomasz qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kurylcioandrzej qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT czuczwarmirosław qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT borysmichał qualityofrecoveryaftererectorspinaeplaneblockinpatientsundergoingbreastsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial