Cargando…
Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception?
Previous research suggests that belief in free will correlates with intentionality attribution. However, whether belief in free will is also related to more basic social processes is unknown. Based on evidence that biological motion contains intentionality cues that observers spontaneously extract,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01704-9 |
_version_ | 1784746837436006400 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Wei Cracco, Emiel Troje, Nikolaus F. Brass, Marcel |
author_facet | Peng, Wei Cracco, Emiel Troje, Nikolaus F. Brass, Marcel |
author_sort | Peng, Wei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research suggests that belief in free will correlates with intentionality attribution. However, whether belief in free will is also related to more basic social processes is unknown. Based on evidence that biological motion contains intentionality cues that observers spontaneously extract, we investigate whether people who believe more in free will, or in related constructs, such as dualism and determinism, would be better at picking up such cues and therefore at detecting biological agents hidden in noise, or would be more inclined to detect intentionality cues and therefore to detect biological agents even when there are none. Signal detection theory was used to measure participants’ ability to detect biological motion from scrambled background noise (d′) and their response bias (c) in doing so. In two experiments, we found that belief in determinism and belief in dualism, but not belief in free will, were associated with biological motion perception. However, no causal effect was found when experimentally manipulating free will-related beliefs. In sum, our results show that biological motion perception, a low-level social process, is related to high-level beliefs about dualism and determinism. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01704-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9281248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92812482022-07-14 Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? Peng, Wei Cracco, Emiel Troje, Nikolaus F. Brass, Marcel Psychol Res Original Article Previous research suggests that belief in free will correlates with intentionality attribution. However, whether belief in free will is also related to more basic social processes is unknown. Based on evidence that biological motion contains intentionality cues that observers spontaneously extract, we investigate whether people who believe more in free will, or in related constructs, such as dualism and determinism, would be better at picking up such cues and therefore at detecting biological agents hidden in noise, or would be more inclined to detect intentionality cues and therefore to detect biological agents even when there are none. Signal detection theory was used to measure participants’ ability to detect biological motion from scrambled background noise (d′) and their response bias (c) in doing so. In two experiments, we found that belief in determinism and belief in dualism, but not belief in free will, were associated with biological motion perception. However, no causal effect was found when experimentally manipulating free will-related beliefs. In sum, our results show that biological motion perception, a low-level social process, is related to high-level beliefs about dualism and determinism. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-022-01704-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9281248/ /pubmed/35831473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01704-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Peng, Wei Cracco, Emiel Troje, Nikolaus F. Brass, Marcel Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title | Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title_full | Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title_fullStr | Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title_short | Does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
title_sort | does belief in free will influence biological motion perception? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01704-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengwei doesbeliefinfreewillinfluencebiologicalmotionperception AT craccoemiel doesbeliefinfreewillinfluencebiologicalmotionperception AT trojenikolausf doesbeliefinfreewillinfluencebiologicalmotionperception AT brassmarcel doesbeliefinfreewillinfluencebiologicalmotionperception |