Cargando…

Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philips, Steven, Shi, Yuyang, Coopersmith, Craig M., Samuels, Owen B., Pimentel-Farias, Cederic, Mei, Yajun, Sadan, Ofer, Akbik, Feras
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3
_version_ 1784746845992386560
author Philips, Steven
Shi, Yuyang
Coopersmith, Craig M.
Samuels, Owen B.
Pimentel-Farias, Cederic
Mei, Yajun
Sadan, Ofer
Akbik, Feras
author_facet Philips, Steven
Shi, Yuyang
Coopersmith, Craig M.
Samuels, Owen B.
Pimentel-Farias, Cederic
Mei, Yajun
Sadan, Ofer
Akbik, Feras
author_sort Philips, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illness. The relative outcomes of NCC critical care management of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear and may help guide further surge planning and provide broader insights into general critical care provided in NCC units. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of all patients requiring critical care for COVID-19 across four hospitals within the Emory Healthcare system during the first three surges. Patients were categorized on the basis of admission to intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by general intensivists or neurointensivists. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographics, clinical complications, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariable and propensity score matching statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 required ICU admission. ICUs were staffed by general intensivists (n = 1071) or neurointensivists (n = 70). Baseline demographics and presentation characteristics were similar between groups, except for patients admitted to neurointensivist-staffed ICUs being younger (59 vs. 65, p = 0.027) and having a higher PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (153 vs. 120, p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, there was no correlation between ICU staffing and the use of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and vasopressors. The rates of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition were similar in neurointensivist-staffed COVID-19 units (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.31–2.64, p = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 surges precipitated a natural experiment in which neurology-trained neurointensivists provided critical care in a comparable context to general intensivists treating the same disease. Neurology-trained neurointensivists delivered comparable outcomes to those of general ICUs during COVID-19 surges. These results further support the role of NCC in meeting general critical care needs of neurocritically ill patients and as a viable surge resource in general critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92812882022-07-14 Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care Philips, Steven Shi, Yuyang Coopersmith, Craig M. Samuels, Owen B. Pimentel-Farias, Cederic Mei, Yajun Sadan, Ofer Akbik, Feras Neurocrit Care Original Work BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illness. The relative outcomes of NCC critical care management of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear and may help guide further surge planning and provide broader insights into general critical care provided in NCC units. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of all patients requiring critical care for COVID-19 across four hospitals within the Emory Healthcare system during the first three surges. Patients were categorized on the basis of admission to intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by general intensivists or neurointensivists. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographics, clinical complications, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariable and propensity score matching statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 required ICU admission. ICUs were staffed by general intensivists (n = 1071) or neurointensivists (n = 70). Baseline demographics and presentation characteristics were similar between groups, except for patients admitted to neurointensivist-staffed ICUs being younger (59 vs. 65, p = 0.027) and having a higher PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (153 vs. 120, p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, there was no correlation between ICU staffing and the use of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and vasopressors. The rates of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition were similar in neurointensivist-staffed COVID-19 units (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.31–2.64, p = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 surges precipitated a natural experiment in which neurology-trained neurointensivists provided critical care in a comparable context to general intensivists treating the same disease. Neurology-trained neurointensivists delivered comparable outcomes to those of general ICUs during COVID-19 surges. These results further support the role of NCC in meeting general critical care needs of neurocritically ill patients and as a viable surge resource in general critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3. Springer US 2022-07-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9281288/ /pubmed/35831731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Work
Philips, Steven
Shi, Yuyang
Coopersmith, Craig M.
Samuels, Owen B.
Pimentel-Farias, Cederic
Mei, Yajun
Sadan, Ofer
Akbik, Feras
Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title_full Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title_fullStr Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title_full_unstemmed Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title_short Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
title_sort surge capacity in the covid-19 era: a natural experiment of neurocritical care in general critical care
topic Original Work
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3
work_keys_str_mv AT philipssteven surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT shiyuyang surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT coopersmithcraigm surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT samuelsowenb surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT pimentelfariascederic surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT meiyajun surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT sadanofer surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare
AT akbikferas surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare