Cargando…
Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3 |
_version_ | 1784746845992386560 |
---|---|
author | Philips, Steven Shi, Yuyang Coopersmith, Craig M. Samuels, Owen B. Pimentel-Farias, Cederic Mei, Yajun Sadan, Ofer Akbik, Feras |
author_facet | Philips, Steven Shi, Yuyang Coopersmith, Craig M. Samuels, Owen B. Pimentel-Farias, Cederic Mei, Yajun Sadan, Ofer Akbik, Feras |
author_sort | Philips, Steven |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illness. The relative outcomes of NCC critical care management of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear and may help guide further surge planning and provide broader insights into general critical care provided in NCC units. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of all patients requiring critical care for COVID-19 across four hospitals within the Emory Healthcare system during the first three surges. Patients were categorized on the basis of admission to intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by general intensivists or neurointensivists. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographics, clinical complications, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariable and propensity score matching statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 required ICU admission. ICUs were staffed by general intensivists (n = 1071) or neurointensivists (n = 70). Baseline demographics and presentation characteristics were similar between groups, except for patients admitted to neurointensivist-staffed ICUs being younger (59 vs. 65, p = 0.027) and having a higher PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (153 vs. 120, p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, there was no correlation between ICU staffing and the use of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and vasopressors. The rates of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition were similar in neurointensivist-staffed COVID-19 units (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.31–2.64, p = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 surges precipitated a natural experiment in which neurology-trained neurointensivists provided critical care in a comparable context to general intensivists treating the same disease. Neurology-trained neurointensivists delivered comparable outcomes to those of general ICUs during COVID-19 surges. These results further support the role of NCC in meeting general critical care needs of neurocritically ill patients and as a viable surge resource in general critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9281288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92812882022-07-14 Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care Philips, Steven Shi, Yuyang Coopersmith, Craig M. Samuels, Owen B. Pimentel-Farias, Cederic Mei, Yajun Sadan, Ofer Akbik, Feras Neurocrit Care Original Work BACKGROUND: COVID-19 surges led to significant challenges in ensuring critical care capacity. In response, some centers leveraged neurocritical care (NCC) capacity as part of the surge response, with neurointensivists providing general critical care for patients with COVID-19 without neurologic illness. The relative outcomes of NCC critical care management of patients with COVID-19 remain unclear and may help guide further surge planning and provide broader insights into general critical care provided in NCC units. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of all patients requiring critical care for COVID-19 across four hospitals within the Emory Healthcare system during the first three surges. Patients were categorized on the basis of admission to intensive care units (ICUs) staffed by general intensivists or neurointensivists. Patients with primary neurological diagnoses were excluded. Baseline demographics, clinical complications, and outcomes were compared between groups using univariable and propensity score matching statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 required ICU admission. ICUs were staffed by general intensivists (n = 1071) or neurointensivists (n = 70). Baseline demographics and presentation characteristics were similar between groups, except for patients admitted to neurointensivist-staffed ICUs being younger (59 vs. 65, p = 0.027) and having a higher PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (153 vs. 120, p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, there was no correlation between ICU staffing and the use of mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and vasopressors. The rates of in-hospital mortality and hospice disposition were similar in neurointensivist-staffed COVID-19 units (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.31–2.64, p = 0.842). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 surges precipitated a natural experiment in which neurology-trained neurointensivists provided critical care in a comparable context to general intensivists treating the same disease. Neurology-trained neurointensivists delivered comparable outcomes to those of general ICUs during COVID-19 surges. These results further support the role of NCC in meeting general critical care needs of neurocritically ill patients and as a viable surge resource in general critical care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3. Springer US 2022-07-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9281288/ /pubmed/35831731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Work Philips, Steven Shi, Yuyang Coopersmith, Craig M. Samuels, Owen B. Pimentel-Farias, Cederic Mei, Yajun Sadan, Ofer Akbik, Feras Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title | Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title_full | Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title_fullStr | Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title_short | Surge Capacity in the COVID-19 Era: a Natural Experiment of Neurocritical Care in General Critical Care |
title_sort | surge capacity in the covid-19 era: a natural experiment of neurocritical care in general critical care |
topic | Original Work |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35831731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01559-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philipssteven surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT shiyuyang surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT coopersmithcraigm surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT samuelsowenb surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT pimentelfariascederic surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT meiyajun surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT sadanofer surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare AT akbikferas surgecapacityinthecovid19eraanaturalexperimentofneurocriticalcareingeneralcriticalcare |