Cargando…

Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines

BACKGROUND: Memory clinics (MCs) play a key role in accurate and timely diagnoses and treatment of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, within Australia, there are little data available on current practices in MCs, which hinder international comparisons for best practice, harmonisation e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naismith, Sharon L., Michaelian, Johannes C., Low, Lee-Fay, Arsenova, Valerie, Mehrani, Inga, Fyfe, Katrina, Kochan, Nicole A., Kurrle, Susan E., Rowe, Christopher, Sachdev, Perminder S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7
_version_ 1784746860457492480
author Naismith, Sharon L.
Michaelian, Johannes C.
Low, Lee-Fay
Arsenova, Valerie
Mehrani, Inga
Fyfe, Katrina
Kochan, Nicole A.
Kurrle, Susan E.
Rowe, Christopher
Sachdev, Perminder S.
author_facet Naismith, Sharon L.
Michaelian, Johannes C.
Low, Lee-Fay
Arsenova, Valerie
Mehrani, Inga
Fyfe, Katrina
Kochan, Nicole A.
Kurrle, Susan E.
Rowe, Christopher
Sachdev, Perminder S.
author_sort Naismith, Sharon L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Memory clinics (MCs) play a key role in accurate and timely diagnoses and treatment of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, within Australia, there are little data available on current practices in MCs, which hinder international comparisons for best practice, harmonisation efforts and national coordination. Here, we aimed to characterise current service profiles of Australian MCs. METHODS: The ‘Australian Dementia Network Survey of Expert Opinion on Best Practice and the Current Clinical Landscape’ was conducted between August-September 2020 as part of a larger-scale Delphi process deployed to develop national MC guidelines. In this study, we report on the subset of questions pertaining to current practice including wait-times and post-diagnostic care. RESULTS: Responses were received from 100 health professionals representing 60 separate clinics (45 public, 11 private, and 4 university/research clinics). The majority of participants were from clinics in metropolitan areas (79%) and in general were from high socioeconomic areas. While wait-times varied, only 28.3% of clinics were able to offer an appointment within 1-2 weeks for urgent referrals, with significantly more private clinics (58.3%) compared to public clinics (19.5%) being able to do so. Wait-times were less than 8 weeks for 34.5% of non-urgent referrals. Only 20.0 and 30.9% of clinics provided cognitive interventions or post-diagnostic support respectively, with 7.3% offering home-based reablement programs, and only 12.7% offering access to group-based education. Metropolitan clinics utilised neuropsychological assessments for a broader range of cases and were more likely to offer clinical trials and access to research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to similar countries with comprehensive government-funded public healthcare systems (i.e., United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada), wait-times for Australian MCs are long, and post-diagnostic support or evidence-based strategies targeting cognition are not common practice. The timely and important results of this study highlight a need for Australian MCs to adopt a more holistic service of multidisciplinary assessment and post-diagnostic support, as well as the need for the number of Australian MCs to be increased to match the rising number of dementia cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9281346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92813462022-07-14 Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines Naismith, Sharon L. Michaelian, Johannes C. Low, Lee-Fay Arsenova, Valerie Mehrani, Inga Fyfe, Katrina Kochan, Nicole A. Kurrle, Susan E. Rowe, Christopher Sachdev, Perminder S. BMC Geriatr Research BACKGROUND: Memory clinics (MCs) play a key role in accurate and timely diagnoses and treatment of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. However, within Australia, there are little data available on current practices in MCs, which hinder international comparisons for best practice, harmonisation efforts and national coordination. Here, we aimed to characterise current service profiles of Australian MCs. METHODS: The ‘Australian Dementia Network Survey of Expert Opinion on Best Practice and the Current Clinical Landscape’ was conducted between August-September 2020 as part of a larger-scale Delphi process deployed to develop national MC guidelines. In this study, we report on the subset of questions pertaining to current practice including wait-times and post-diagnostic care. RESULTS: Responses were received from 100 health professionals representing 60 separate clinics (45 public, 11 private, and 4 university/research clinics). The majority of participants were from clinics in metropolitan areas (79%) and in general were from high socioeconomic areas. While wait-times varied, only 28.3% of clinics were able to offer an appointment within 1-2 weeks for urgent referrals, with significantly more private clinics (58.3%) compared to public clinics (19.5%) being able to do so. Wait-times were less than 8 weeks for 34.5% of non-urgent referrals. Only 20.0 and 30.9% of clinics provided cognitive interventions or post-diagnostic support respectively, with 7.3% offering home-based reablement programs, and only 12.7% offering access to group-based education. Metropolitan clinics utilised neuropsychological assessments for a broader range of cases and were more likely to offer clinical trials and access to research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to similar countries with comprehensive government-funded public healthcare systems (i.e., United Kingdom, Ireland and Canada), wait-times for Australian MCs are long, and post-diagnostic support or evidence-based strategies targeting cognition are not common practice. The timely and important results of this study highlight a need for Australian MCs to adopt a more holistic service of multidisciplinary assessment and post-diagnostic support, as well as the need for the number of Australian MCs to be increased to match the rising number of dementia cases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9281346/ /pubmed/35836238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Naismith, Sharon L.
Michaelian, Johannes C.
Low, Lee-Fay
Arsenova, Valerie
Mehrani, Inga
Fyfe, Katrina
Kochan, Nicole A.
Kurrle, Susan E.
Rowe, Christopher
Sachdev, Perminder S.
Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title_full Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title_fullStr Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title_short Characterising Australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
title_sort characterising australian memory clinics: current practice and service needs informing national service guidelines
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03253-7
work_keys_str_mv AT naismithsharonl characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT michaelianjohannesc characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT lowleefay characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT arsenovavalerie characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT mehraniinga characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT fyfekatrina characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT kochannicolea characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT kurrlesusane characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT rowechristopher characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines
AT sachdevperminders characterisingaustralianmemoryclinicscurrentpracticeandserviceneedsinformingnationalserviceguidelines