Cargando…
Support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The survival benefit and safety of Impella support versus intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock were investigated in several observational trials that revealed mixed results. Thus, in order to prov...
Autores principales: | Rao, Lingzhang, Huang, Xianli, Luo, Jinlan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025159 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Impellent impeller—Switching intra‐aortic balloon pump to IMPELLA‐CP after ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock
por: Contarini, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trends in Veno‐Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support With and Without an Impella or Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock
por: Hendrickson, Michael J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Efficacy and safety of colchicine in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Xiong, Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump May Grant No Benefit to Improve the Mortality of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in Short and Long Term: An Updated Meta-Analysis
por: Su, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic
shock
por: Alushi, Brunilda, et al.
Publicado: (2019)