Cargando…
Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of large-scale clinical studies and evidence-based evidence to prove the relationship between serum amyloid A (SAA) and the severity and prognosis of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica D...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028880 |
_version_ | 1784746989115670528 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yongkai Xiaojing, He Zhuanyun, Li Li, Dandan Yang, Jianzhong |
author_facet | Li, Yongkai Xiaojing, He Zhuanyun, Li Li, Dandan Yang, Jianzhong |
author_sort | Li, Yongkai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of large-scale clinical studies and evidence-based evidence to prove the relationship between serum amyloid A (SAA) and the severity and prognosis of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science for original articles from December 1, 2019 to December 19, 2020. Search criteria include free text search, explosive MESH/EMTREE terms, and all synonyms for SAA and COVID-19. There are no language restrictions on the searched documents. Statistical methods were performed using Stata 14.0 software, and RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration for meta-analysis. The 10 included studies in the literature were classified according to the severity of the novel coronavirus treatment guidelines, with mild/moderate categorized as nonsevere and severe/critical as severe, and the data were meta-analyzed using multiple subgroup standard deviations combined. Severe and nonsevere were finally divided into 2 groups, and the combined data were meta-analyzed according to the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis given by random effects showed that SAA levels were significantly higher in severe vs nonsevere (standardized mean difference 1.20 [95% confidence interval 0.91–1.48]), which was statistically significant (P < .001). The 3 literatures studied (random effect size 0.11 [95% confidence interval 0.05–0.19]; I(2) = 56.68%) and were statistically significant, z = 5.46 P < .01, suggesting that the risk of death occurs at higher levels with increasing SAA values, with the risk of death in the severe group being 11% higher than in the nonsevere group. CONCLUSION: SAA can be considered as a biomarker for predicting the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. SAA can be used for early warning of the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and for monitoring the recovery process, which has important clinical value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9281919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92819192022-08-02 Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis Li, Yongkai Xiaojing, He Zhuanyun, Li Li, Dandan Yang, Jianzhong Medicine (Baltimore) 4900 BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of large-scale clinical studies and evidence-based evidence to prove the relationship between serum amyloid A (SAA) and the severity and prognosis of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science for original articles from December 1, 2019 to December 19, 2020. Search criteria include free text search, explosive MESH/EMTREE terms, and all synonyms for SAA and COVID-19. There are no language restrictions on the searched documents. Statistical methods were performed using Stata 14.0 software, and RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration for meta-analysis. The 10 included studies in the literature were classified according to the severity of the novel coronavirus treatment guidelines, with mild/moderate categorized as nonsevere and severe/critical as severe, and the data were meta-analyzed using multiple subgroup standard deviations combined. Severe and nonsevere were finally divided into 2 groups, and the combined data were meta-analyzed according to the standardized mean difference. RESULTS: The results of the meta-analysis given by random effects showed that SAA levels were significantly higher in severe vs nonsevere (standardized mean difference 1.20 [95% confidence interval 0.91–1.48]), which was statistically significant (P < .001). The 3 literatures studied (random effect size 0.11 [95% confidence interval 0.05–0.19]; I(2) = 56.68%) and were statistically significant, z = 5.46 P < .01, suggesting that the risk of death occurs at higher levels with increasing SAA values, with the risk of death in the severe group being 11% higher than in the nonsevere group. CONCLUSION: SAA can be considered as a biomarker for predicting the severity and prognosis of COVID-19. SAA can be used for early warning of the poor prognosis of COVID-19 and for monitoring the recovery process, which has important clinical value. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9281919/ /pubmed/35363202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028880 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | 4900 Li, Yongkai Xiaojing, He Zhuanyun, Li Li, Dandan Yang, Jianzhong Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title | Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Prognostic value of serum amyloid A in COVID-19: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of serum amyloid a in covid-19: a meta-analysis |
topic | 4900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyongkai prognosticvalueofserumamyloidaincovid19ametaanalysis AT xiaojinghe prognosticvalueofserumamyloidaincovid19ametaanalysis AT zhuanyunli prognosticvalueofserumamyloidaincovid19ametaanalysis AT lidandan prognosticvalueofserumamyloidaincovid19ametaanalysis AT yangjianzhong prognosticvalueofserumamyloidaincovid19ametaanalysis |