Cargando…

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itonaga, Masahiro, Kitano, Masayuki, Yoshikawa, Takanori, Ashida, Reiko, Yamashita, Yasunobu, Hatamaru, Kenichi, Takenaka, Mamoru, Yamazaki, Tomohiro, Ogura, Takeshi, Nishioka, Nobu, Sakai, Arata, Masuda, Atsuhiro, Shiomi, Hideyuki, Shimokawa, Toshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268
_version_ 1784747018554441728
author Itonaga, Masahiro
Kitano, Masayuki
Yoshikawa, Takanori
Ashida, Reiko
Yamashita, Yasunobu
Hatamaru, Kenichi
Takenaka, Mamoru
Yamazaki, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takeshi
Nishioka, Nobu
Sakai, Arata
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Shimokawa, Toshio
author_facet Itonaga, Masahiro
Kitano, Masayuki
Yoshikawa, Takanori
Ashida, Reiko
Yamashita, Yasunobu
Hatamaru, Kenichi
Takenaka, Mamoru
Yamazaki, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takeshi
Nishioka, Nobu
Sakai, Arata
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Shimokawa, Toshio
author_sort Itonaga, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, whereas the EUS-CDS route does not. Therefore, EUS-CDS is expected to have a longer stent patency than ERCP. However, for first-line biliary drainage, it remains unclear whether EUS-CDS or ERCP is superior in terms of stent patency. To reduce the frequency of highly adverse events (AEs) such as bile peritonitis or stent migration following EUS-CDS, we developed an antimigration metal stent with a thin delivery system for tract dilatation. This study is designed to assess whether EUS-CDS with this novel stent is superior to ERCP with a traditional metal stent in terms of stent patency when the two techniques are used for first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multicenter single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 95 patients in four tertiary centers. Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction that is unresectable or presents a very high surgical risk and who pass the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP in a 1:1 proportion. The primary endpoint is the stent patency rate 180 days after stent insertion. Secondary outcomes include the rates of technical success, clinical success, technical success in cases not requiring fistulous-tract dilation (only EUS-CDS group), procedure-related AEs, re-intervention success, patients receiving post-drainage chemotherapy, procedure time, and overall survival time. DISCUSSION: If EUS-CDS is superior to ERCP in terms of stent patency and safety for the first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction, it is expected that the first-line drainage method will be changed from ERCP to EUS-CDS, and that interruption of chemotherapy due to stent dysfunction can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: UMIN000041343. Registered on August 6, 2020. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047201 Version number: 1.2, December 7, 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92820382022-08-02 Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Yoshikawa, Takanori Ashida, Reiko Yamashita, Yasunobu Hatamaru, Kenichi Takenaka, Mamoru Yamazaki, Tomohiro Ogura, Takeshi Nishioka, Nobu Sakai, Arata Masuda, Atsuhiro Shiomi, Hideyuki Shimokawa, Toshio Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, whereas the EUS-CDS route does not. Therefore, EUS-CDS is expected to have a longer stent patency than ERCP. However, for first-line biliary drainage, it remains unclear whether EUS-CDS or ERCP is superior in terms of stent patency. To reduce the frequency of highly adverse events (AEs) such as bile peritonitis or stent migration following EUS-CDS, we developed an antimigration metal stent with a thin delivery system for tract dilatation. This study is designed to assess whether EUS-CDS with this novel stent is superior to ERCP with a traditional metal stent in terms of stent patency when the two techniques are used for first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multicenter single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 95 patients in four tertiary centers. Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction that is unresectable or presents a very high surgical risk and who pass the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP in a 1:1 proportion. The primary endpoint is the stent patency rate 180 days after stent insertion. Secondary outcomes include the rates of technical success, clinical success, technical success in cases not requiring fistulous-tract dilation (only EUS-CDS group), procedure-related AEs, re-intervention success, patients receiving post-drainage chemotherapy, procedure time, and overall survival time. DISCUSSION: If EUS-CDS is superior to ERCP in terms of stent patency and safety for the first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction, it is expected that the first-line drainage method will be changed from ERCP to EUS-CDS, and that interruption of chemotherapy due to stent dysfunction can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: UMIN000041343. Registered on August 6, 2020. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047201 Version number: 1.2, December 7, 2020. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9282038/ /pubmed/33761729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4500
Itonaga, Masahiro
Kitano, Masayuki
Yoshikawa, Takanori
Ashida, Reiko
Yamashita, Yasunobu
Hatamaru, Kenichi
Takenaka, Mamoru
Yamazaki, Tomohiro
Ogura, Takeshi
Nishioka, Nobu
Sakai, Arata
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Shimokawa, Toshio
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268
work_keys_str_mv AT itonagamasahiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kitanomasayuki comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yoshikawatakanori comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ashidareiko comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamashitayasunobu comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hatamarukenichi comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takenakamamoru comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamazakitomohiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oguratakeshi comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nishiokanobu comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sakaiarata comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT masudaatsuhiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shiomihideyuki comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shimokawatoshio comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial