Cargando…
Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268 |
_version_ | 1784747018554441728 |
---|---|
author | Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Yoshikawa, Takanori Ashida, Reiko Yamashita, Yasunobu Hatamaru, Kenichi Takenaka, Mamoru Yamazaki, Tomohiro Ogura, Takeshi Nishioka, Nobu Sakai, Arata Masuda, Atsuhiro Shiomi, Hideyuki Shimokawa, Toshio |
author_facet | Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Yoshikawa, Takanori Ashida, Reiko Yamashita, Yasunobu Hatamaru, Kenichi Takenaka, Mamoru Yamazaki, Tomohiro Ogura, Takeshi Nishioka, Nobu Sakai, Arata Masuda, Atsuhiro Shiomi, Hideyuki Shimokawa, Toshio |
author_sort | Itonaga, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, whereas the EUS-CDS route does not. Therefore, EUS-CDS is expected to have a longer stent patency than ERCP. However, for first-line biliary drainage, it remains unclear whether EUS-CDS or ERCP is superior in terms of stent patency. To reduce the frequency of highly adverse events (AEs) such as bile peritonitis or stent migration following EUS-CDS, we developed an antimigration metal stent with a thin delivery system for tract dilatation. This study is designed to assess whether EUS-CDS with this novel stent is superior to ERCP with a traditional metal stent in terms of stent patency when the two techniques are used for first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multicenter single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 95 patients in four tertiary centers. Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction that is unresectable or presents a very high surgical risk and who pass the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP in a 1:1 proportion. The primary endpoint is the stent patency rate 180 days after stent insertion. Secondary outcomes include the rates of technical success, clinical success, technical success in cases not requiring fistulous-tract dilation (only EUS-CDS group), procedure-related AEs, re-intervention success, patients receiving post-drainage chemotherapy, procedure time, and overall survival time. DISCUSSION: If EUS-CDS is superior to ERCP in terms of stent patency and safety for the first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction, it is expected that the first-line drainage method will be changed from ERCP to EUS-CDS, and that interruption of chemotherapy due to stent dysfunction can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: UMIN000041343. Registered on August 6, 2020. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047201 Version number: 1.2, December 7, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9282038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92820382022-08-02 Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Yoshikawa, Takanori Ashida, Reiko Yamashita, Yasunobu Hatamaru, Kenichi Takenaka, Mamoru Yamazaki, Tomohiro Ogura, Takeshi Nishioka, Nobu Sakai, Arata Masuda, Atsuhiro Shiomi, Hideyuki Shimokawa, Toshio Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 INTRODUCTION: In patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction and normal gastrointestinal anatomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is indicated when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) fails. The ERCP drainage route passes through the tumor, whereas the EUS-CDS route does not. Therefore, EUS-CDS is expected to have a longer stent patency than ERCP. However, for first-line biliary drainage, it remains unclear whether EUS-CDS or ERCP is superior in terms of stent patency. To reduce the frequency of highly adverse events (AEs) such as bile peritonitis or stent migration following EUS-CDS, we developed an antimigration metal stent with a thin delivery system for tract dilatation. This study is designed to assess whether EUS-CDS with this novel stent is superior to ERCP with a traditional metal stent in terms of stent patency when the two techniques are used for first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multicenter single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 95 patients in four tertiary centers. Patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction that is unresectable or presents a very high surgical risk and who pass the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EUS-CDS or ERCP in a 1:1 proportion. The primary endpoint is the stent patency rate 180 days after stent insertion. Secondary outcomes include the rates of technical success, clinical success, technical success in cases not requiring fistulous-tract dilation (only EUS-CDS group), procedure-related AEs, re-intervention success, patients receiving post-drainage chemotherapy, procedure time, and overall survival time. DISCUSSION: If EUS-CDS is superior to ERCP in terms of stent patency and safety for the first-line drainage of malignant distal biliary obstruction, it is expected that the first-line drainage method will be changed from ERCP to EUS-CDS, and that interruption of chemotherapy due to stent dysfunction can be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: UMIN000041343. Registered on August 6, 2020. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000047201 Version number: 1.2, December 7, 2020. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9282038/ /pubmed/33761729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 4500 Itonaga, Masahiro Kitano, Masayuki Yoshikawa, Takanori Ashida, Reiko Yamashita, Yasunobu Hatamaru, Kenichi Takenaka, Mamoru Yamazaki, Tomohiro Ogura, Takeshi Nishioka, Nobu Sakai, Arata Masuda, Atsuhiro Shiomi, Hideyuki Shimokawa, Toshio Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: A multicenter randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in first-line biliary drainage for malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itonagamasahiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kitanomasayuki comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yoshikawatakanori comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ashidareiko comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamashitayasunobu comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hatamarukenichi comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT takenakamamoru comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamazakitomohiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oguratakeshi comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nishiokanobu comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sakaiarata comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masudaatsuhiro comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shiomihideyuki comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shimokawatoshio comparisonofendoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomyandendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyinfirstlinebiliarydrainageformalignantdistalbileductobstructionamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |