Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: With the acceleration of the pace of life, the phenomenon of anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is more and more common, and “psycho-cardiology” arises spontaneously. At present, the drug treatments of psycho-cardiology are difficult to achieve satisfact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Xueyan, Liu, Xinxin, Zhong, Fengxing, Wang, Yiguo, Guan, Hui, Zhang, Qiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025084
_version_ 1784747024332095488
author Han, Xueyan
Liu, Xinxin
Zhong, Fengxing
Wang, Yiguo
Guan, Hui
Zhang, Qiming
author_facet Han, Xueyan
Liu, Xinxin
Zhong, Fengxing
Wang, Yiguo
Guan, Hui
Zhang, Qiming
author_sort Han, Xueyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the acceleration of the pace of life, the phenomenon of anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is more and more common, and “psycho-cardiology” arises spontaneously. At present, the drug treatments of psycho-cardiology are difficult to achieve satisfactory results, and the side effects are obvious. Complementary and replacement therapies of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder play an increasingly positive role, but there is a lack of comparison among different complementary and alternative therapies. In this study, Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) analysis method will be used for the first time to synthesize all the evidences of direct and indirect comparison among a variety of interventions, and rank their effectiveness and safety. METHODS: Two independent researchers will search from the beginning to January 2021 mainly including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and closely related ongoing RCTs of complementary and alternative therapies for CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. And then identify, select and extract the data. The primary outcome measures are frequency of acute attack angina, severity of angina pectoris; the changed score in the validated scales, which can assess severity of anxiety or depression. Secondary outcomes include total efficacy rate, electrocardiogram improvement, traditional Chinese medicine symptoms score, changes of dosage of nitroglycerin and adverse effects. Using softwares WinBUGS 1.4.3 and STATA 16.0 for pairwise meta-analysis and NMA to comprehensively evaluate various interventions. The quality of evidences will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: This NMA will comprehensively compare and rank the efficacy and safety of a series of complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. CONCLUSION: Supplementary and replacement therapies play an essential role in improving CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. We expect that the NMA will provide reliable evidences of evidence-based medicine for treatment of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202120046. ETHICAL APPROVAL: This review does not require ethical approval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92820602022-08-02 Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis Han, Xueyan Liu, Xinxin Zhong, Fengxing Wang, Yiguo Guan, Hui Zhang, Qiming Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: With the acceleration of the pace of life, the phenomenon of anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is more and more common, and “psycho-cardiology” arises spontaneously. At present, the drug treatments of psycho-cardiology are difficult to achieve satisfactory results, and the side effects are obvious. Complementary and replacement therapies of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder play an increasingly positive role, but there is a lack of comparison among different complementary and alternative therapies. In this study, Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) analysis method will be used for the first time to synthesize all the evidences of direct and indirect comparison among a variety of interventions, and rank their effectiveness and safety. METHODS: Two independent researchers will search from the beginning to January 2021 mainly including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and closely related ongoing RCTs of complementary and alternative therapies for CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. And then identify, select and extract the data. The primary outcome measures are frequency of acute attack angina, severity of angina pectoris; the changed score in the validated scales, which can assess severity of anxiety or depression. Secondary outcomes include total efficacy rate, electrocardiogram improvement, traditional Chinese medicine symptoms score, changes of dosage of nitroglycerin and adverse effects. Using softwares WinBUGS 1.4.3 and STATA 16.0 for pairwise meta-analysis and NMA to comprehensively evaluate various interventions. The quality of evidences will be evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: This NMA will comprehensively compare and rank the efficacy and safety of a series of complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. CONCLUSION: Supplementary and replacement therapies play an essential role in improving CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. We expect that the NMA will provide reliable evidences of evidence-based medicine for treatment of CHD complicated with anxiety or depression disorder. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202120046. ETHICAL APPROVAL: This review does not require ethical approval. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9282060/ /pubmed/33761669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025084 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3800
Han, Xueyan
Liu, Xinxin
Zhong, Fengxing
Wang, Yiguo
Guan, Hui
Zhang, Qiming
Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: A protocol for Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for coronary heart disease complicated with anxiety or depression disorder: a protocol for bayesian network meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025084
work_keys_str_mv AT hanxueyan comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuxinxin comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhongfengxing comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangyiguo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT guanhui comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangqiming comparisonofefficacyandsafetyofcomplementaryandalternativetherapiesforcoronaryheartdiseasecomplicatedwithanxietyordepressiondisorderaprotocolforbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis