Cargando…
Is restrictive fluid resuscitation beneficial not only for hemorrhagic shock but also for septic shock?: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Whether to use limited fluid resuscitation (LFR) in patients with hemorrhagic shock or septic shock remains controversial. This research was aimed to assess the pros and cons of utilizing LFR in hemorrhagic shock or septic shock patients. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of...
Autores principales: | Jiang, Shuaiyu, Wu, Mengmeng, Lu, Xiaoguang, Zhong, Yilong, Kang, Xin, Song, Yi, Fan, Zhiwei |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025143 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effectiveness and safety of hypotensive resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: A protocol for meta-analysis
por: Wang, Hua, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Effect of VTI(LVOT) variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients
por: Wang, Jinzhong, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Effect of methylene blue on hemodynamic and metabolic response in septic shock patients
por: Luis-Silva, Fabio, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Clinical usefulness of biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of prognosis in sepsis and septic shock
por: Lee, Jae Ha, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
An Elevated Percentage of Reticulated Platelet Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Septic Shock Patients
por: Wu, Qin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)