Cargando…
The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to invest...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201 |
_version_ | 1784747027450560512 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Yanhui Chen, Yuan Ji, Cheng Ye, Wen |
author_facet | Wu, Yanhui Chen, Yuan Ji, Cheng Ye, Wen |
author_sort | Wu, Yanhui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate which analgesic provides better pain relief. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the published literature in PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases will be performed. Only RCTs evaluating LIA versus ISB in TSA are included in this study. The primary outcome was pain score. Secondary outcome measures included opioid consumption, postoperative adverse event, and length of stay. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is used to evaluate the risk of bias of included RCTs by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of ISB and LIA for early postoperative pain control after TSA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S3MBP. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Since this study is on the basis of published or registered RCTs, ethical approval and informed consent of patients are not required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9282073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92820732022-08-02 The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Wu, Yanhui Chen, Yuan Ji, Cheng Ye, Wen Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate which analgesic provides better pain relief. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the published literature in PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases will be performed. Only RCTs evaluating LIA versus ISB in TSA are included in this study. The primary outcome was pain score. Secondary outcome measures included opioid consumption, postoperative adverse event, and length of stay. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is used to evaluate the risk of bias of included RCTs by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of ISB and LIA for early postoperative pain control after TSA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S3MBP. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Since this study is on the basis of published or registered RCTs, ethical approval and informed consent of patients are not required. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9282073/ /pubmed/33761704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7000 Wu, Yanhui Chen, Yuan Ji, Cheng Ye, Wen The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 7000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuyanhui theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenyuan theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jicheng theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yewen theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuyanhui efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenyuan efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jicheng efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yewen efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |