Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yanhui, Chen, Yuan, Ji, Cheng, Ye, Wen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201
_version_ 1784747027450560512
author Wu, Yanhui
Chen, Yuan
Ji, Cheng
Ye, Wen
author_facet Wu, Yanhui
Chen, Yuan
Ji, Cheng
Ye, Wen
author_sort Wu, Yanhui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate which analgesic provides better pain relief. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the published literature in PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases will be performed. Only RCTs evaluating LIA versus ISB in TSA are included in this study. The primary outcome was pain score. Secondary outcome measures included opioid consumption, postoperative adverse event, and length of stay. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is used to evaluate the risk of bias of included RCTs by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of ISB and LIA for early postoperative pain control after TSA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S3MBP. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Since this study is on the basis of published or registered RCTs, ethical approval and informed consent of patients are not required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92820732022-08-02 The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Wu, Yanhui Chen, Yuan Ji, Cheng Ye, Wen Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 BACKGROUND: None of review has been conducted to compare the efficacy of interscalene blockade (ISB) with that of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We thus conduct a high-quality meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate which analgesic provides better pain relief. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the published literature in PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases will be performed. Only RCTs evaluating LIA versus ISB in TSA are included in this study. The primary outcome was pain score. Secondary outcome measures included opioid consumption, postoperative adverse event, and length of stay. The Cochrane risk of bias tool is used to evaluate the risk of bias of included RCTs by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSIONS: This study expects to provide credible and scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of ISB and LIA for early postoperative pain control after TSA. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S3MBP. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Since this study is on the basis of published or registered RCTs, ethical approval and informed consent of patients are not required. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9282073/ /pubmed/33761704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7000
Wu, Yanhui
Chen, Yuan
Ji, Cheng
Ye, Wen
The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short The efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of interscalene blockade versus local infiltration analgesia in primary total shoulder arthroplasty?: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025201
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyanhui theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenyuan theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jicheng theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yewen theefficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuyanhui efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenyuan efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jicheng efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yewen efficacyandsafetyofinterscaleneblockadeversuslocalinfiltrationanalgesiainprimarytotalshoulderarthroplastyaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials