Cargando…

Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?

OBJECTIVES: The prominence of “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) protocols being adopted in thoracic surgery requires a re-evaluation of mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess the role of sequential compression devices (SCD) in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdul, Sami Aftab, Anstee, Caitlin, Villeneuve, Patrick J, Gilbert, Sebatien, Seely, Andrew J E, Sundaresan, Sudhir, Maziak, Donna E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35713491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac165
_version_ 1784747067832270848
author Abdul, Sami Aftab
Anstee, Caitlin
Villeneuve, Patrick J
Gilbert, Sebatien
Seely, Andrew J E
Sundaresan, Sudhir
Maziak, Donna E
author_facet Abdul, Sami Aftab
Anstee, Caitlin
Villeneuve, Patrick J
Gilbert, Sebatien
Seely, Andrew J E
Sundaresan, Sudhir
Maziak, Donna E
author_sort Abdul, Sami Aftab
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The prominence of “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) protocols being adopted in thoracic surgery requires a re-evaluation of mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess the role of sequential compression devices (SCD) in the prevention of VTEs such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE) in thoracic surgical patients. METHODS: We identified 200 patients who underwent elective oncological thoracic surgery between December 2018 and December 2020 in 2 cohorts—1 with SCDs and 1 without (i.e. non-SCD). All patients followed a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. The quality of care provided by SCDs was evaluated by the incidence and severity of postoperative and follow-up VTEs. Cohorts were compared by the Caprini score (CS) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with a two one-sided t-test analysis. Secondary outcomes include perioperative characteristics and follow-up data. RESULTS: Only 2 patients within the SCD group developed a PE with average CS and CCI metrics, both after hospital discharge and treated with anticoagulants, raising concern over the prophylactic nature of SCDs. The CS (6.9 ± 1.3 and 6.9 ± 1.5; P = 0.96) and the CCI (3.8 ± 2.0 and 4.1 ± 2.6; P = 0.33) for non-SCD and SCD, respectively, did not differ. The two one-sided t-test analysis for CS (P < 0.001) and CCI (P < 0.001) demonstrated equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger studies are required to confirm these results, routine SCD use may not be required when implementing ERAS protocols because clinically significant VTE rates were minimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92822612022-07-18 Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery? Abdul, Sami Aftab Anstee, Caitlin Villeneuve, Patrick J Gilbert, Sebatien Seely, Andrew J E Sundaresan, Sudhir Maziak, Donna E Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Thoracic OBJECTIVES: The prominence of “enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) protocols being adopted in thoracic surgery requires a re-evaluation of mechanical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis guidelines. The goal of this study was to assess the role of sequential compression devices (SCD) in the prevention of VTEs such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE) in thoracic surgical patients. METHODS: We identified 200 patients who underwent elective oncological thoracic surgery between December 2018 and December 2020 in 2 cohorts—1 with SCDs and 1 without (i.e. non-SCD). All patients followed a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. The quality of care provided by SCDs was evaluated by the incidence and severity of postoperative and follow-up VTEs. Cohorts were compared by the Caprini score (CS) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with a two one-sided t-test analysis. Secondary outcomes include perioperative characteristics and follow-up data. RESULTS: Only 2 patients within the SCD group developed a PE with average CS and CCI metrics, both after hospital discharge and treated with anticoagulants, raising concern over the prophylactic nature of SCDs. The CS (6.9 ± 1.3 and 6.9 ± 1.5; P = 0.96) and the CCI (3.8 ± 2.0 and 4.1 ± 2.6; P = 0.33) for non-SCD and SCD, respectively, did not differ. The two one-sided t-test analysis for CS (P < 0.001) and CCI (P < 0.001) demonstrated equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: Although larger studies are required to confirm these results, routine SCD use may not be required when implementing ERAS protocols because clinically significant VTE rates were minimal. Oxford University Press 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9282261/ /pubmed/35713491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac165 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thoracic
Abdul, Sami Aftab
Anstee, Caitlin
Villeneuve, Patrick J
Gilbert, Sebatien
Seely, Andrew J E
Sundaresan, Sudhir
Maziak, Donna E
Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title_full Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title_fullStr Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title_short Are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
title_sort are sequential compression devices routinely necessary following enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery?
topic Thoracic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35713491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac165
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulsamiaftab aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT ansteecaitlin aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT villeneuvepatrickj aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT gilbertsebatien aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT seelyandrewje aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT sundaresansudhir aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery
AT maziakdonnae aresequentialcompressiondevicesroutinelynecessaryfollowingenhancedrecoveryafterthoracicsurgery