Cargando…

Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies

This study examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and ecological innovation on carbon (CO(2)) emissions in a panel of 18 developed countries from 2005 to 2018 using second-generation time-series panel data techniques. We use three robust long-run estimators, namely two-stage least...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare, Acheampong, Theophilus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21729-2
_version_ 1784747144409776128
author Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare
Acheampong, Theophilus
author_facet Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare
Acheampong, Theophilus
author_sort Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare
collection PubMed
description This study examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and ecological innovation on carbon (CO(2)) emissions in a panel of 18 developed countries from 2005 to 2018 using second-generation time-series panel data techniques. We use three robust long-run estimators, namely two-stage least squares (2SLS), panel generalised method of moments (GMM) and generalised least squares (GLS), to resolve heterogeneity, endogeneity and simultaneity in the panels. We further performed causality tests to ascertain the direction of causality between the variables. Our estimations suggest three innovative findings. First, economic growth contributes significantly and positively to CO(2) emissions; however, this happens at an optimal level of growth after which carbon emission reduces, indicating that our sample exhibits an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship. Second, the impact of EPU on CO(2) emissions is diverse: high levels of EPU have a significant influence on CO(2) emissions only in high-polluting countries but not in low-polluting ones. Thirdly, research and development (R&D), foreign direct investment (FDI), urbanisation and renewable energy (RE) usage were also found to have varying effects on CO(2) emissions. These findings highlight the heterogeneous relationship between carbon emissions and economic indicators even in advanced economies, as the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) holds true in high-pollution countries while the pollution halo effect holds for low-pollution ones. A key policy implication of this work is that the quest to mitigate emissions should not be a one-size-fits-all approach because not every country’s urbanisation rate, FDI inflows, R&D and renewable energy consumption directly affect CO(2) emissions in the face of economic policy uncertainties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92826202022-07-15 Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare Acheampong, Theophilus Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article This study examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and ecological innovation on carbon (CO(2)) emissions in a panel of 18 developed countries from 2005 to 2018 using second-generation time-series panel data techniques. We use three robust long-run estimators, namely two-stage least squares (2SLS), panel generalised method of moments (GMM) and generalised least squares (GLS), to resolve heterogeneity, endogeneity and simultaneity in the panels. We further performed causality tests to ascertain the direction of causality between the variables. Our estimations suggest three innovative findings. First, economic growth contributes significantly and positively to CO(2) emissions; however, this happens at an optimal level of growth after which carbon emission reduces, indicating that our sample exhibits an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship. Second, the impact of EPU on CO(2) emissions is diverse: high levels of EPU have a significant influence on CO(2) emissions only in high-polluting countries but not in low-polluting ones. Thirdly, research and development (R&D), foreign direct investment (FDI), urbanisation and renewable energy (RE) usage were also found to have varying effects on CO(2) emissions. These findings highlight the heterogeneous relationship between carbon emissions and economic indicators even in advanced economies, as the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) holds true in high-pollution countries while the pollution halo effect holds for low-pollution ones. A key policy implication of this work is that the quest to mitigate emissions should not be a one-size-fits-all approach because not every country’s urbanisation rate, FDI inflows, R&D and renewable energy consumption directly affect CO(2) emissions in the face of economic policy uncertainties. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9282620/ /pubmed/35809168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21729-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Vitenu-Sackey, Prince Asare
Acheampong, Theophilus
Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title_full Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title_fullStr Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title_full_unstemmed Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title_short Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
title_sort impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and r&d on co(2) emissions: evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35809168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21729-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vitenusackeyprinceasare impactofeconomicpolicyuncertaintyenergyintensitytechnologicalinnovationandrdonco2emissionsevidencefromapanelof18developedeconomies
AT acheampongtheophilus impactofeconomicpolicyuncertaintyenergyintensitytechnologicalinnovationandrdonco2emissionsevidencefromapanelof18developedeconomies