Management of nonoperative cervical spine fractures: An institutional analysis of follow-up duration and image acquisition

BACKGROUND: How long do nonoperative cervical fractures have to be followed and with how many imaging studies? METHODS: We reviewed 69 adult patients with 122 (31 occiptocervical and 91 sub-axial) cervical fractures; at least one of the cervical fractures was managed nonoperatively. Outcomes were as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westrup, Alison M., Hendrickson, Landon S., Hughes, Kendall L., Smith, Jaylun I., O’Neal, Christen M., Chen, Sixia, Conner, Andrew K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855143
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_107_2022
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: How long do nonoperative cervical fractures have to be followed and with how many imaging studies? METHODS: We reviewed 69 adult patients with 122 (31 occiptocervical and 91 sub-axial) cervical fractures; at least one of the cervical fractures was managed nonoperatively. Outcomes were assessed along with the optimal follow-up duration and frequency of various diagnostic studies. RESULTS: An average of four follow-up visits occurred on average 28-, 66-, 94-, and 158-day post hospital discharge. The average time between discharge and orthotic clearance was 70 days (±32.4 days). Radiographic studies were obtained at follow-up visits, respectively, in, 82.6%, 83.6%, 94.7%, and 100% of patients. CONCLUSION: The trend for managing nonoperative cervical fractures was an unduly prolonged follow-up duration that included obtaining too many imaging studies.

Ejemplares similares