Cargando…

Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?

Introduction  High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective  To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shemesh, Shay, Luckman, Judith, Marom, Tal, Kraus, Oded, Tamir, Sharon Ovnat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736580
_version_ 1784747226322436096
author Shemesh, Shay
Luckman, Judith
Marom, Tal
Kraus, Oded
Tamir, Sharon Ovnat
author_facet Shemesh, Shay
Luckman, Judith
Marom, Tal
Kraus, Oded
Tamir, Sharon Ovnat
author_sort Shemesh, Shay
collection PubMed
description Introduction  High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective  To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures between an ears with and without cholesteatoma. Methods  A retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery due to unilateral cholesteatoma. The HRCT HU index of the scutum, of three middle-ear ossicles, of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC), and of the fallopian canal was measured in both ears. A comparison was made between the cholesteatoma and the non-cholesteatomatous ear (control). All measurements were conducted by an otolaryngologist. To assess the interobserver bias, 10% of the samples were randomly and independently assessed by another otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist who were blinded. Results  The average HU index was lower in the ear with cholesteatoma when compared with the non-cholesteatomatous ear. While the differences were statistically significant regarding the measurements of the scutum (516.02 ± 311.693 versus 855.64 ± 389.999; p  = 0.001), the malleus (1049.44 ± 481.765 versus 1413.47 ± 313.376; p  = 0.01), and the incus (498.03 ± 264.184 versus 714.25 ± 405.631; p  = 0.001), the differences in the measurements of the LSCC (1042.34 ± 301.066 versus 1154.53 ± 359.609; p  = 0.69) and of the fallopian canal (467.19 ± 221.556 versus 543.51 ± 263.573; p  = 0.108) were not significantly different between both groups. The stapes was immeasurable in both groups due to its small size. Conclusion  Hounsfield unit index measurements are a useful tool that may aid in the diagnosis of early-stage cholesteatoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9282958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92829582022-07-15 Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful? Shemesh, Shay Luckman, Judith Marom, Tal Kraus, Oded Tamir, Sharon Ovnat Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of the temporal bone are used to assess the bony erosion of the middle-ear structures whenever cholesteatoma is suspected. Objective  To study the differences in HRCT Hounsfield unit (HU) index measurements of middle-ear bony structures between an ears with and without cholesteatoma. Methods  A retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery due to unilateral cholesteatoma. The HRCT HU index of the scutum, of three middle-ear ossicles, of the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC), and of the fallopian canal was measured in both ears. A comparison was made between the cholesteatoma and the non-cholesteatomatous ear (control). All measurements were conducted by an otolaryngologist. To assess the interobserver bias, 10% of the samples were randomly and independently assessed by another otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist who were blinded. Results  The average HU index was lower in the ear with cholesteatoma when compared with the non-cholesteatomatous ear. While the differences were statistically significant regarding the measurements of the scutum (516.02 ± 311.693 versus 855.64 ± 389.999; p  = 0.001), the malleus (1049.44 ± 481.765 versus 1413.47 ± 313.376; p  = 0.01), and the incus (498.03 ± 264.184 versus 714.25 ± 405.631; p  = 0.001), the differences in the measurements of the LSCC (1042.34 ± 301.066 versus 1154.53 ± 359.609; p  = 0.69) and of the fallopian canal (467.19 ± 221.556 versus 543.51 ± 263.573; p  = 0.108) were not significantly different between both groups. The stapes was immeasurable in both groups due to its small size. Conclusion  Hounsfield unit index measurements are a useful tool that may aid in the diagnosis of early-stage cholesteatoma. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9282958/ /pubmed/35846805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736580 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Shemesh, Shay
Luckman, Judith
Marom, Tal
Kraus, Oded
Tamir, Sharon Ovnat
Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_full Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_fullStr Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_full_unstemmed Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_short Are Hounsfield Unit Measurements of Bony Absorption Changes in Cholesteatoma Helpful?
title_sort are hounsfield unit measurements of bony absorption changes in cholesteatoma helpful?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9282958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736580
work_keys_str_mv AT shemeshshay arehounsfieldunitmeasurementsofbonyabsorptionchangesincholesteatomahelpful
AT luckmanjudith arehounsfieldunitmeasurementsofbonyabsorptionchangesincholesteatomahelpful
AT maromtal arehounsfieldunitmeasurementsofbonyabsorptionchangesincholesteatomahelpful
AT krausoded arehounsfieldunitmeasurementsofbonyabsorptionchangesincholesteatomahelpful
AT tamirsharonovnat arehounsfieldunitmeasurementsofbonyabsorptionchangesincholesteatomahelpful