Cargando…
How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming
Despite the dire conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports in terms of global warming and its impacts on Earth’s climate, ecosystems and human society, a skepticism claiming that the projected global warming is alarmist or, at least, overestimated, still...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35835803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16264-6 |
_version_ | 1784747314707955712 |
---|---|
author | Carvalho, D. Rafael, S. Monteiro, A. Rodrigues, V. Lopes, M. Rocha, A. |
author_facet | Carvalho, D. Rafael, S. Monteiro, A. Rodrigues, V. Lopes, M. Rocha, A. |
author_sort | Carvalho, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the dire conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports in terms of global warming and its impacts on Earth’s climate, ecosystems and human society, a skepticism claiming that the projected global warming is alarmist or, at least, overestimated, still persists. Given the years passed since the future climate projections that served as basis for the IPCC 4th, 5th and 6th Assessment Reports were released, it is now possible to answer this fundamental question if the projected global warming has been over or underestimated. This study presents a comparison between CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future temperature projections and observations. The results show that the global warming projected by all CMIPs and future climate scenarios here analyzed project a global warming slightly lower than the observed one. The observed warming is closer to the upper level of the projected ones, revealing that CMIPs future climate scenarios with higher GHG emissions appear to be the most realistic ones. These results show that CMIPs future warming projections have been slightly conservative up to 2020, which could suggest a similar cold bias in their warming projections up to the end of the current century. However, given the short future periods here analyzed, inferences about warming at longer timescales cannot be done with confidence, since the models internal variability can play a relevant role on timescales of 20 years and less. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9283450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92834502022-07-16 How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming Carvalho, D. Rafael, S. Monteiro, A. Rodrigues, V. Lopes, M. Rocha, A. Sci Rep Article Despite the dire conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports in terms of global warming and its impacts on Earth’s climate, ecosystems and human society, a skepticism claiming that the projected global warming is alarmist or, at least, overestimated, still persists. Given the years passed since the future climate projections that served as basis for the IPCC 4th, 5th and 6th Assessment Reports were released, it is now possible to answer this fundamental question if the projected global warming has been over or underestimated. This study presents a comparison between CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future temperature projections and observations. The results show that the global warming projected by all CMIPs and future climate scenarios here analyzed project a global warming slightly lower than the observed one. The observed warming is closer to the upper level of the projected ones, revealing that CMIPs future climate scenarios with higher GHG emissions appear to be the most realistic ones. These results show that CMIPs future warming projections have been slightly conservative up to 2020, which could suggest a similar cold bias in their warming projections up to the end of the current century. However, given the short future periods here analyzed, inferences about warming at longer timescales cannot be done with confidence, since the models internal variability can play a relevant role on timescales of 20 years and less. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9283450/ /pubmed/35835803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16264-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Carvalho, D. Rafael, S. Monteiro, A. Rodrigues, V. Lopes, M. Rocha, A. How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title | How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title_full | How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title_fullStr | How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title_full_unstemmed | How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title_short | How well have CMIP3, CMIP5 and CMIP6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
title_sort | how well have cmip3, cmip5 and cmip6 future climate projections portrayed the recently observed warming |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35835803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16264-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvalhod howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming AT rafaels howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming AT monteiroa howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming AT rodriguesv howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming AT lopesm howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming AT rochaa howwellhavecmip3cmip5andcmip6futureclimateprojectionsportrayedtherecentlyobservedwarming |