Cargando…

Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency

An improved understanding of the environmental transmission of Taenia spp. is key to control of the parasite. Methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in different environmental matrices, including sludge and water, currently lack performance validation with regard to the recovery efficiency and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Bock, Sophie, Van Damme, Inge, Saelens, Ganna, Zeng, Hang, Vangeenberghe, Sandra, Gabriël, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00170
_version_ 1784747327342247936
author De Bock, Sophie
Van Damme, Inge
Saelens, Ganna
Zeng, Hang
Vangeenberghe, Sandra
Gabriël, Sarah
author_facet De Bock, Sophie
Van Damme, Inge
Saelens, Ganna
Zeng, Hang
Vangeenberghe, Sandra
Gabriël, Sarah
author_sort De Bock, Sophie
collection PubMed
description An improved understanding of the environmental transmission of Taenia spp. is key to control of the parasite. Methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in different environmental matrices, including sludge and water, currently lack performance validation with regard to the recovery efficiency and process ease of use. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the recovery efficiency and process duration of commonly used methods for the detection of Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples. Ten detection methods for Taenia spp. eggs were selected from a systematic review. Sludge and water samples were spiked with a high dose of Taenia saginata eggs, i.e., around 200 eggs/g sludge and 50 eggs/ml water, and were tested using five methods each. The two methods with the highest egg recovery efficiencies were selected per matrix for assessment with a lower spiking dose, i.e., 4 eggs/g sludge and 1 egg/ml water. Each time five replicates were used. Recovery efficiency was defined as the proportion of the number of eggs recovered to the total number of eggs spiked. Using the high spiking dose, all samples tested positive for all the methods. The mean egg recovery efficiency varied from 4% to 69% for sludge samples and from 3% to 68% for water samples. Using the lower spiking dose, one of the methods performed on sludge samples was able to detect all replicates, whereas only one replicate was positive using the other method. For water, all low dose samples tested positive using both methods. In conclusion, most methods performed inadequately in recovering Taenia eggs from sludge and water, with half of the methods performed on the high dose samples having a mean egg recovery efficiency of approximately 10% or less. The assessed recovery methods were generally time-consuming and labourious. A more thorough validation of existing recovery methods and improvement of method protocols to increase recovery efficiency is thus urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9283506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92835062022-07-16 Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency De Bock, Sophie Van Damme, Inge Saelens, Ganna Zeng, Hang Vangeenberghe, Sandra Gabriël, Sarah Food Waterborne Parasitol Research Article An improved understanding of the environmental transmission of Taenia spp. is key to control of the parasite. Methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in different environmental matrices, including sludge and water, currently lack performance validation with regard to the recovery efficiency and process ease of use. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the recovery efficiency and process duration of commonly used methods for the detection of Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples. Ten detection methods for Taenia spp. eggs were selected from a systematic review. Sludge and water samples were spiked with a high dose of Taenia saginata eggs, i.e., around 200 eggs/g sludge and 50 eggs/ml water, and were tested using five methods each. The two methods with the highest egg recovery efficiencies were selected per matrix for assessment with a lower spiking dose, i.e., 4 eggs/g sludge and 1 egg/ml water. Each time five replicates were used. Recovery efficiency was defined as the proportion of the number of eggs recovered to the total number of eggs spiked. Using the high spiking dose, all samples tested positive for all the methods. The mean egg recovery efficiency varied from 4% to 69% for sludge samples and from 3% to 68% for water samples. Using the lower spiking dose, one of the methods performed on sludge samples was able to detect all replicates, whereas only one replicate was positive using the other method. For water, all low dose samples tested positive using both methods. In conclusion, most methods performed inadequately in recovering Taenia eggs from sludge and water, with half of the methods performed on the high dose samples having a mean egg recovery efficiency of approximately 10% or less. The assessed recovery methods were generally time-consuming and labourious. A more thorough validation of existing recovery methods and improvement of method protocols to increase recovery efficiency is thus urgently needed. Elsevier 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9283506/ /pubmed/35844813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00170 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
De Bock, Sophie
Van Damme, Inge
Saelens, Ganna
Zeng, Hang
Vangeenberghe, Sandra
Gabriël, Sarah
Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title_full Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title_fullStr Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title_short Preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify Taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: A spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
title_sort preliminary evaluation of different methods to detect and quantify taenia eggs in sludge and water samples: a spiking experiment to assess recovery efficiency
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35844813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2022.e00170
work_keys_str_mv AT debocksophie preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency
AT vandammeinge preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency
AT saelensganna preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency
AT zenghang preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency
AT vangeenberghesandra preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency
AT gabrielsarah preliminaryevaluationofdifferentmethodstodetectandquantifytaeniaeggsinsludgeandwatersamplesaspikingexperimenttoassessrecoveryefficiency