Cargando…

Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Lucy, Swiezy, Sarah, McKinzie, Alexandra, Komanapalli, Sarah, Bernard, Caitlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894
_version_ 1784747431056900096
author Brown, Lucy
Swiezy, Sarah
McKinzie, Alexandra
Komanapalli, Sarah
Bernard, Caitlin
author_facet Brown, Lucy
Swiezy, Sarah
McKinzie, Alexandra
Komanapalli, Sarah
Bernard, Caitlin
author_sort Brown, Lucy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients, and 3) preferred modality of instruction. STUDY DESIGN: A survey assessed students about UMC. Course syllabus learning objectives and APGO educational guidelines were compared. RESULTS: There were 309 responses total; six did not complete all survey questions and were excluded. Participants (n = 303) were primarily female (62%) and White (74%). Across all class levels, many (61%) students expected to learn about family planning and contraception in UMC. While most (84–88%) participants who completed the preclinical course with or without the clerkship felt prepared to counsel about common, non-controversial pharmacotherapies, only 20% of students felt prepared to counsel on abortion options, and 75% of students who had completed both the preclinical and OBGYN clerkship felt unprepared for abortion counseling Overall, 86% of all students surveyed believed that the medical school should enhance its reproductive health coverage in UMC. Traditional lectures, panels, and direct clinical exposure were the most popular instructional modalities. CONCLUSION: We identified potential gaps in UMC where students expressed high level of interest with low level of preparedness regarding abortion options counseling, even among senior students. Considering the high percentage of students expecting to learn about pregnancy termination and family planning in their UMC, this expectation is not being met. Students were open to a variety of modalities of instruction, indicating that several possible options exist for curricular integration. IMPLICATIONS: Despite evidence of need for training in family planning and abortion, few medical institutions have a standardized curriculum. Little available literature exists on curricula covering pregnancy options and contraception counseling, signifying a gap of knowledge and an opportunity to study how to integrate these important topics into UMC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9283882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92838822022-07-16 Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school Brown, Lucy Swiezy, Sarah McKinzie, Alexandra Komanapalli, Sarah Bernard, Caitlin Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a Midwestern medical school's current pregnancy termination and family planning undergraduate medical curriculum (UMC) in accordance with Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO) guidelines. Assess 1) student interest 2) preparedness to counsel patients, and 3) preferred modality of instruction. STUDY DESIGN: A survey assessed students about UMC. Course syllabus learning objectives and APGO educational guidelines were compared. RESULTS: There were 309 responses total; six did not complete all survey questions and were excluded. Participants (n = 303) were primarily female (62%) and White (74%). Across all class levels, many (61%) students expected to learn about family planning and contraception in UMC. While most (84–88%) participants who completed the preclinical course with or without the clerkship felt prepared to counsel about common, non-controversial pharmacotherapies, only 20% of students felt prepared to counsel on abortion options, and 75% of students who had completed both the preclinical and OBGYN clerkship felt unprepared for abortion counseling Overall, 86% of all students surveyed believed that the medical school should enhance its reproductive health coverage in UMC. Traditional lectures, panels, and direct clinical exposure were the most popular instructional modalities. CONCLUSION: We identified potential gaps in UMC where students expressed high level of interest with low level of preparedness regarding abortion options counseling, even among senior students. Considering the high percentage of students expecting to learn about pregnancy termination and family planning in their UMC, this expectation is not being met. Students were open to a variety of modalities of instruction, indicating that several possible options exist for curricular integration. IMPLICATIONS: Despite evidence of need for training in family planning and abortion, few medical institutions have a standardized curriculum. Little available literature exists on curricula covering pregnancy options and contraception counseling, signifying a gap of knowledge and an opportunity to study how to integrate these important topics into UMC. Elsevier 2022-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9283882/ /pubmed/35847608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Lucy
Swiezy, Sarah
McKinzie, Alexandra
Komanapalli, Sarah
Bernard, Caitlin
Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title_full Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title_fullStr Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title_short Evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
title_sort evaluation of family planning and abortion education in preclinical curriculum at a large midwestern medical school
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09894
work_keys_str_mv AT brownlucy evaluationoffamilyplanningandabortioneducationinpreclinicalcurriculumatalargemidwesternmedicalschool
AT swiezysarah evaluationoffamilyplanningandabortioneducationinpreclinicalcurriculumatalargemidwesternmedicalschool
AT mckinziealexandra evaluationoffamilyplanningandabortioneducationinpreclinicalcurriculumatalargemidwesternmedicalschool
AT komanapallisarah evaluationoffamilyplanningandabortioneducationinpreclinicalcurriculumatalargemidwesternmedicalschool
AT bernardcaitlin evaluationoffamilyplanningandabortioneducationinpreclinicalcurriculumatalargemidwesternmedicalschool