Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury

Successful cell therapy requires cells to resist the hostile ischemic myocardium, be retained to continue secreting cardioprotective growth factors/exosomes, and resist immunological host responses. Clinically relevant stem/progenitor cells in a rodent model of acute myocardial infarction (MI) demon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunasekaran, Muthukumar, Mishra, Rachana, Saha, Progyaparamita, Morales, David, Cheng, Wen-Chih, Jayaraman, Arun R., Hoffman, Jessica R., Davidson, Lauran, Chen, Ling, Shah, Aakash M., Bittle, Gregory, Fu, Xuebin, Tulshyan, Antariksh, Abdullah, Mohamed, Kingsbury, Tami, Civin, Curt, Yang, Peixin, Davis, Michael E., Bolli, Roberto, Hare, Joshua M., Sharma, Sudhish, Kaushal, Sunjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104656
_version_ 1784747434021224448
author Gunasekaran, Muthukumar
Mishra, Rachana
Saha, Progyaparamita
Morales, David
Cheng, Wen-Chih
Jayaraman, Arun R.
Hoffman, Jessica R.
Davidson, Lauran
Chen, Ling
Shah, Aakash M.
Bittle, Gregory
Fu, Xuebin
Tulshyan, Antariksh
Abdullah, Mohamed
Kingsbury, Tami
Civin, Curt
Yang, Peixin
Davis, Michael E.
Bolli, Roberto
Hare, Joshua M.
Sharma, Sudhish
Kaushal, Sunjay
author_facet Gunasekaran, Muthukumar
Mishra, Rachana
Saha, Progyaparamita
Morales, David
Cheng, Wen-Chih
Jayaraman, Arun R.
Hoffman, Jessica R.
Davidson, Lauran
Chen, Ling
Shah, Aakash M.
Bittle, Gregory
Fu, Xuebin
Tulshyan, Antariksh
Abdullah, Mohamed
Kingsbury, Tami
Civin, Curt
Yang, Peixin
Davis, Michael E.
Bolli, Roberto
Hare, Joshua M.
Sharma, Sudhish
Kaushal, Sunjay
author_sort Gunasekaran, Muthukumar
collection PubMed
description Successful cell therapy requires cells to resist the hostile ischemic myocardium, be retained to continue secreting cardioprotective growth factors/exosomes, and resist immunological host responses. Clinically relevant stem/progenitor cells in a rodent model of acute myocardial infarction (MI) demonstrated that neonatal cardiac mesenchymal stromal cells (nMSCs) provide the most robust cardiac functional recovery. Transplanted nMSCs significantly increased the number of tissue reparative macrophages and regulatory T-cells and decreased monocyte-derived inflammatory macrophages and neutrophils in the host myocardium. mRNA microarray and single-cell analyses combined with targeted depletion studies established CD47 in nMSCs as a key molecule responsible for cell retention in the myocardium through an antiphagocytic mechanism regulated by miR34a-5p. Gain and loss-of-function studies demonstrated that miR34a-5p also regulated the production of exosomes and cardioprotective paracrine factors in the nMSC secretome. In conclusion, miR34a-5p and CD47 play an important role in determining the composition of nMSCs’ secretome and immune evasion, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9283895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92838952022-07-16 Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury Gunasekaran, Muthukumar Mishra, Rachana Saha, Progyaparamita Morales, David Cheng, Wen-Chih Jayaraman, Arun R. Hoffman, Jessica R. Davidson, Lauran Chen, Ling Shah, Aakash M. Bittle, Gregory Fu, Xuebin Tulshyan, Antariksh Abdullah, Mohamed Kingsbury, Tami Civin, Curt Yang, Peixin Davis, Michael E. Bolli, Roberto Hare, Joshua M. Sharma, Sudhish Kaushal, Sunjay iScience Article Successful cell therapy requires cells to resist the hostile ischemic myocardium, be retained to continue secreting cardioprotective growth factors/exosomes, and resist immunological host responses. Clinically relevant stem/progenitor cells in a rodent model of acute myocardial infarction (MI) demonstrated that neonatal cardiac mesenchymal stromal cells (nMSCs) provide the most robust cardiac functional recovery. Transplanted nMSCs significantly increased the number of tissue reparative macrophages and regulatory T-cells and decreased monocyte-derived inflammatory macrophages and neutrophils in the host myocardium. mRNA microarray and single-cell analyses combined with targeted depletion studies established CD47 in nMSCs as a key molecule responsible for cell retention in the myocardium through an antiphagocytic mechanism regulated by miR34a-5p. Gain and loss-of-function studies demonstrated that miR34a-5p also regulated the production of exosomes and cardioprotective paracrine factors in the nMSC secretome. In conclusion, miR34a-5p and CD47 play an important role in determining the composition of nMSCs’ secretome and immune evasion, respectively. Elsevier 2022-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9283895/ /pubmed/35847554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104656 Text en © 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gunasekaran, Muthukumar
Mishra, Rachana
Saha, Progyaparamita
Morales, David
Cheng, Wen-Chih
Jayaraman, Arun R.
Hoffman, Jessica R.
Davidson, Lauran
Chen, Ling
Shah, Aakash M.
Bittle, Gregory
Fu, Xuebin
Tulshyan, Antariksh
Abdullah, Mohamed
Kingsbury, Tami
Civin, Curt
Yang, Peixin
Davis, Michael E.
Bolli, Roberto
Hare, Joshua M.
Sharma, Sudhish
Kaushal, Sunjay
Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title_full Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title_short Comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
title_sort comparative efficacy and mechanism of action of cardiac progenitor cells after cardiac injury
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104656
work_keys_str_mv AT gunasekaranmuthukumar comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT mishrarachana comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT sahaprogyaparamita comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT moralesdavid comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT chengwenchih comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT jayaramanarunr comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT hoffmanjessicar comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT davidsonlauran comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT chenling comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT shahaakashm comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT bittlegregory comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT fuxuebin comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT tulshyanantariksh comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT abdullahmohamed comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT kingsburytami comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT civincurt comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT yangpeixin comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT davismichaele comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT bolliroberto comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT harejoshuam comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT sharmasudhish comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury
AT kaushalsunjay comparativeefficacyandmechanismofactionofcardiacprogenitorcellsaftercardiacinjury