Cargando…
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865 |
_version_ | 1784747479135158272 |
---|---|
author | O’Neill, Thomas McNeese, Nathan Barron, Amy Schelble, Beau |
author_facet | O’Neill, Thomas McNeese, Nathan Barron, Amy Schelble, Beau |
author_sort | O’Neill, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning literature on high-performance teamwork identifies the factors critical to success, much less is known about how human–autonomy teams (HATs) achieve success. Human–autonomy teamwork involves humans working interdependently toward a common goal along with autonomous agents. Autonomous agents involve a degree of self-government and self-directed behavior (agency), and autonomous agents take on a unique role or set of tasks and work interdependently with human team members to achieve a shared objective. METHOD: We searched the literature on human–autonomy teaming. To meet our criteria for inclusion, the paper needed to involve empirical research and meet our definition of human–autonomy teaming. We found 76 articles that met our criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: We report on research environments and we find that the key independent variables involve autonomous agent characteristics, team composition, task characteristics, human individual differences, training, and communication. We identify themes for each of these and discuss the future research needs. CONCLUSION: There are areas where research findings are clear and consistent, but there are many opportunities for future research. Particularly important will be research that identifies mechanisms linking team input to team output variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92840852022-07-16 Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature O’Neill, Thomas McNeese, Nathan Barron, Amy Schelble, Beau Hum Factors Teams And Groups OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning literature on high-performance teamwork identifies the factors critical to success, much less is known about how human–autonomy teams (HATs) achieve success. Human–autonomy teamwork involves humans working interdependently toward a common goal along with autonomous agents. Autonomous agents involve a degree of self-government and self-directed behavior (agency), and autonomous agents take on a unique role or set of tasks and work interdependently with human team members to achieve a shared objective. METHOD: We searched the literature on human–autonomy teaming. To meet our criteria for inclusion, the paper needed to involve empirical research and meet our definition of human–autonomy teaming. We found 76 articles that met our criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: We report on research environments and we find that the key independent variables involve autonomous agent characteristics, team composition, task characteristics, human individual differences, training, and communication. We identify themes for each of these and discuss the future research needs. CONCLUSION: There are areas where research findings are clear and consistent, but there are many opportunities for future research. Particularly important will be research that identifies mechanisms linking team input to team output variables. SAGE Publications 2020-10-22 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9284085/ /pubmed/33092417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Teams And Groups O’Neill, Thomas McNeese, Nathan Barron, Amy Schelble, Beau Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature |
title | Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical
Literature |
title_full | Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical
Literature |
title_fullStr | Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical
Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical
Literature |
title_short | Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical
Literature |
title_sort | human–autonomy teaming: a review and analysis of the empirical
literature |
topic | Teams And Groups |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oneillthomas humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature AT mcneesenathan humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature AT barronamy humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature AT schelblebeau humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature |