Cargando…

Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature

OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Neill, Thomas, McNeese, Nathan, Barron, Amy, Schelble, Beau
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
_version_ 1784747479135158272
author O’Neill, Thomas
McNeese, Nathan
Barron, Amy
Schelble, Beau
author_facet O’Neill, Thomas
McNeese, Nathan
Barron, Amy
Schelble, Beau
author_sort O’Neill, Thomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning literature on high-performance teamwork identifies the factors critical to success, much less is known about how human–autonomy teams (HATs) achieve success. Human–autonomy teamwork involves humans working interdependently toward a common goal along with autonomous agents. Autonomous agents involve a degree of self-government and self-directed behavior (agency), and autonomous agents take on a unique role or set of tasks and work interdependently with human team members to achieve a shared objective. METHOD: We searched the literature on human–autonomy teaming. To meet our criteria for inclusion, the paper needed to involve empirical research and meet our definition of human–autonomy teaming. We found 76 articles that met our criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: We report on research environments and we find that the key independent variables involve autonomous agent characteristics, team composition, task characteristics, human individual differences, training, and communication. We identify themes for each of these and discuss the future research needs. CONCLUSION: There are areas where research findings are clear and consistent, but there are many opportunities for future research. Particularly important will be research that identifies mechanisms linking team input to team output variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92840852022-07-16 Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature O’Neill, Thomas McNeese, Nathan Barron, Amy Schelble, Beau Hum Factors Teams And Groups OBJECTIVE: We define human–autonomy teaming and offer a synthesis of the existing empirical research on the topic. Specifically, we identify the research environments, dependent variables, themes representing the key findings, and critical future research directions. BACKGROUND: Whereas a burgeoning literature on high-performance teamwork identifies the factors critical to success, much less is known about how human–autonomy teams (HATs) achieve success. Human–autonomy teamwork involves humans working interdependently toward a common goal along with autonomous agents. Autonomous agents involve a degree of self-government and self-directed behavior (agency), and autonomous agents take on a unique role or set of tasks and work interdependently with human team members to achieve a shared objective. METHOD: We searched the literature on human–autonomy teaming. To meet our criteria for inclusion, the paper needed to involve empirical research and meet our definition of human–autonomy teaming. We found 76 articles that met our criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: We report on research environments and we find that the key independent variables involve autonomous agent characteristics, team composition, task characteristics, human individual differences, training, and communication. We identify themes for each of these and discuss the future research needs. CONCLUSION: There are areas where research findings are clear and consistent, but there are many opportunities for future research. Particularly important will be research that identifies mechanisms linking team input to team output variables. SAGE Publications 2020-10-22 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9284085/ /pubmed/33092417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Teams And Groups
O’Neill, Thomas
McNeese, Nathan
Barron, Amy
Schelble, Beau
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title_full Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title_fullStr Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title_full_unstemmed Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title_short Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
title_sort human–autonomy teaming: a review and analysis of the empirical literature
topic Teams And Groups
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33092417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820960865
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillthomas humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature
AT mcneesenathan humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature
AT barronamy humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature
AT schelblebeau humanautonomyteamingareviewandanalysisoftheempiricalliterature