Cargando…
Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common, disabling condition of symptomatic cervical spinal cord compression that requires significant research advances to improve patient outcomes. A James Lind Alliance Partnership recently identified the top research priorities for DCM. To e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771617 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36194 |
_version_ | 1784747545917915136 |
---|---|
author | Bestwick, Henry Teh, Jye Quan Mowforth, Oliver Grodzinski, Ben Kotter, Mark Davies, Benjamin |
author_facet | Bestwick, Henry Teh, Jye Quan Mowforth, Oliver Grodzinski, Ben Kotter, Mark Davies, Benjamin |
author_sort | Bestwick, Henry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common, disabling condition of symptomatic cervical spinal cord compression that requires significant research advances to improve patient outcomes. A James Lind Alliance Partnership recently identified the top research priorities for DCM. To effectively address these priorities, appropriate funding of DCM research is essential. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to review current funding in DCM research and highlight future research funding opportunities. METHODS: A systematic search of Web of Science for “cervical AND myelopathy” was conducted. Papers exclusively studying DCM with declared funding and published between January 1, 1995, and March 21, 2020, were considered eligible. Funding sources were classified by country of origin and organization type. A grant search was also conducted using Dimensions.ai (Digital Science Ltd). RESULTS: A total of 621 papers were included, with 300 unique funding bodies. The top funders were AO Spine (n=87); National Institutes of Health, USA (n=63); and National Natural Science Foundation, China (n=63). Funding sources in the USA (n=242) supported the most DCM research, followed by China (n=209) and Japan (n=116). Funding in the USA was primarily provided by corporate or nonprofit organizations (146/242, 60.3%), while in China, the majority of funding was from institutions (208/209, 99.5%). Dimensions.ai gives an estimate for the total declared grant funding awards for DCM-specific research. Data here showed 180 grants awarded specifically for DCM research, with a total value of US $45.6 million since 1996. CONCLUSIONS: DCM funding appears to be predominantly from the USA, China, and Japan, aligning with areas of high DCM research activity and underpinning the importance of funding to increasing research capacity. The existing funding sources differ from medical research in general, representing opportunities for future investment in DCM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92843652022-07-16 Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review Bestwick, Henry Teh, Jye Quan Mowforth, Oliver Grodzinski, Ben Kotter, Mark Davies, Benjamin Interact J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common, disabling condition of symptomatic cervical spinal cord compression that requires significant research advances to improve patient outcomes. A James Lind Alliance Partnership recently identified the top research priorities for DCM. To effectively address these priorities, appropriate funding of DCM research is essential. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to review current funding in DCM research and highlight future research funding opportunities. METHODS: A systematic search of Web of Science for “cervical AND myelopathy” was conducted. Papers exclusively studying DCM with declared funding and published between January 1, 1995, and March 21, 2020, were considered eligible. Funding sources were classified by country of origin and organization type. A grant search was also conducted using Dimensions.ai (Digital Science Ltd). RESULTS: A total of 621 papers were included, with 300 unique funding bodies. The top funders were AO Spine (n=87); National Institutes of Health, USA (n=63); and National Natural Science Foundation, China (n=63). Funding sources in the USA (n=242) supported the most DCM research, followed by China (n=209) and Japan (n=116). Funding in the USA was primarily provided by corporate or nonprofit organizations (146/242, 60.3%), while in China, the majority of funding was from institutions (208/209, 99.5%). Dimensions.ai gives an estimate for the total declared grant funding awards for DCM-specific research. Data here showed 180 grants awarded specifically for DCM research, with a total value of US $45.6 million since 1996. CONCLUSIONS: DCM funding appears to be predominantly from the USA, China, and Japan, aligning with areas of high DCM research activity and underpinning the importance of funding to increasing research capacity. The existing funding sources differ from medical research in general, representing opportunities for future investment in DCM. JMIR Publications 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9284365/ /pubmed/35771617 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36194 Text en ©Henry Bestwick, Jye Quan Teh, Oliver Mowforth, Ben Grodzinski, Mark Kotter, Benjamin Davies. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 30.06.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Bestwick, Henry Teh, Jye Quan Mowforth, Oliver Grodzinski, Ben Kotter, Mark Davies, Benjamin Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title | Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title_full | Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title_short | Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review |
title_sort | existing funding sources in degenerative cervical myelopathy research: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35771617 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bestwickhenry existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview AT tehjyequan existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview AT mowfortholiver existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview AT grodzinskiben existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview AT kottermark existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview AT daviesbenjamin existingfundingsourcesindegenerativecervicalmyelopathyresearchscopingreview |