Cargando…
Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing
The objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and proces...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735 |
_version_ | 1784747576077058048 |
---|---|
author | Bilinski, Jaroslaw Dziurzynski, Mikolaj Grzesiowski, Pawel Podsiadly, Edyta Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz Lis, Karol Tyszka, Martyna Ozieranski, Krzysztof Dziewit, Łukasz Basak, Grzegorz W. |
author_facet | Bilinski, Jaroslaw Dziurzynski, Mikolaj Grzesiowski, Pawel Podsiadly, Edyta Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz Lis, Karol Tyszka, Martyna Ozieranski, Krzysztof Dziewit, Łukasz Basak, Grzegorz W. |
author_sort | Bilinski, Jaroslaw |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and processed) is equipotent to classical fresh FMT preparation. For that, three complementary methods were applied, including: (i) culturing in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, (ii) measuring viability by flow cytometry, and (iii) next-generation sequencing. Flow cytometry with cell staining showed that the applied freezing protocol causes significant changes in all of the observed bacterial fractions. Alive cell counts dropped four times, from around 70% to 15%, while the other two fractions, dead and unknown cell counts quadrupled and doubled, with the unknown fraction becoming the dominant one, with an average contribution of 57.47% per sample. It will be very interesting to uncover what this unknown fraction is (e.g., bacterial spores), as this may change our conclusions (if these are spores, the viability could be even higher after freezing). Freezing had a huge impact on the structure of cultivable bacterial communities. The biggest drop after freezing in the number of cultivable species was observed for Actinobacteria and Bacilli. In most cases, selected biodiversity indices were slightly lower for frozen samples. PCoA visualization built using weighted UniFrac index showed no donor-wise clusters, but a clear split between fresh and frozen samples. This split can be in part attributed to the changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales orders. Our results clearly show that whole stool freezing without any cryoprotectants has a great impact on the cultivability and biodiversity of the bacterial community, and possibly also on the viability of bacterial cells. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92845062022-07-16 Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing Bilinski, Jaroslaw Dziurzynski, Mikolaj Grzesiowski, Pawel Podsiadly, Edyta Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz Lis, Karol Tyszka, Martyna Ozieranski, Krzysztof Dziewit, Łukasz Basak, Grzegorz W. Front Microbiol Microbiology The objective of this work was to compare the quality of FMT preparations made from fresh feces with those made from feces frozen at –30°C without any pre-processing or cryopreservation additives. The research hypothesis was that such preservation protocol (frozen whole stool, then thawed and processed) is equipotent to classical fresh FMT preparation. For that, three complementary methods were applied, including: (i) culturing in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, (ii) measuring viability by flow cytometry, and (iii) next-generation sequencing. Flow cytometry with cell staining showed that the applied freezing protocol causes significant changes in all of the observed bacterial fractions. Alive cell counts dropped four times, from around 70% to 15%, while the other two fractions, dead and unknown cell counts quadrupled and doubled, with the unknown fraction becoming the dominant one, with an average contribution of 57.47% per sample. It will be very interesting to uncover what this unknown fraction is (e.g., bacterial spores), as this may change our conclusions (if these are spores, the viability could be even higher after freezing). Freezing had a huge impact on the structure of cultivable bacterial communities. The biggest drop after freezing in the number of cultivable species was observed for Actinobacteria and Bacilli. In most cases, selected biodiversity indices were slightly lower for frozen samples. PCoA visualization built using weighted UniFrac index showed no donor-wise clusters, but a clear split between fresh and frozen samples. This split can be in part attributed to the changes in the relative abundance of Bacteroidales and Clostridiales orders. Our results clearly show that whole stool freezing without any cryoprotectants has a great impact on the cultivability and biodiversity of the bacterial community, and possibly also on the viability of bacterial cells. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9284506/ /pubmed/35847075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bilinski, Dziurzynski, Grzesiowski, Podsiadly, Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Dzieciatkowski, Lis, Tyszka, Ozieranski, Dziewit and Basak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Bilinski, Jaroslaw Dziurzynski, Mikolaj Grzesiowski, Pawel Podsiadly, Edyta Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Anna Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz Lis, Karol Tyszka, Martyna Ozieranski, Krzysztof Dziewit, Łukasz Basak, Grzegorz W. Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title_full | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title_fullStr | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title_full_unstemmed | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title_short | Fresh Versus Frozen Stool for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation—Assessment by Multimethod Approach Combining Culturing, Flow Cytometry, and Next-Generation Sequencing |
title_sort | fresh versus frozen stool for fecal microbiota transplantation—assessment by multimethod approach combining culturing, flow cytometry, and next-generation sequencing |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.872735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilinskijaroslaw freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT dziurzynskimikolaj freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT grzesiowskipawel freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT podsiadlyedyta freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT stelmaszczykemmelanna freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT dzieciatkowskitomasz freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT liskarol freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT tyszkamartyna freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT ozieranskikrzysztof freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT dziewitłukasz freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing AT basakgrzegorzw freshversusfrozenstoolforfecalmicrobiotatransplantationassessmentbymultimethodapproachcombiningculturingflowcytometryandnextgenerationsequencing |