Cargando…

Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review

Preterm infants are more likely to be born with congenital anomalies than those who are born at full-term. Conversely, neonates born with congenital anomalies are also more likely to be born preterm than those without congenital anomalies. Moreover, the comorbid impact of prematurity and congenital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gunn-Charlton, Julia K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.880891
_version_ 1784747582044504064
author Gunn-Charlton, Julia K.
author_facet Gunn-Charlton, Julia K.
author_sort Gunn-Charlton, Julia K.
collection PubMed
description Preterm infants are more likely to be born with congenital anomalies than those who are born at full-term. Conversely, neonates born with congenital anomalies are also more likely to be born preterm than those without congenital anomalies. Moreover, the comorbid impact of prematurity and congenital anomalies is more than cumulative. Multiple common factors increase the risk of brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment in both preterm babies and those born with congenital anomalies. These include prolonged hospital length of stay, feeding difficulties, nutritional deficits, pain exposure and administration of medications including sedatives and analgesics. Congenital heart disease provides a well-studied example of the impact of comorbid disease with prematurity. Impaired brain growth and maturity is well described in the third trimester in this population; the immature brain is subsequently more vulnerable to further injury. There is a colinear relationship between degree of prematurity and outcome both in terms of mortality and neurological morbidity. Both prematurity and relative brain immaturity independently increase the risk of subsequent neurodevelopmental impairment in infants with CHD. Non-cardiac surgery also poses a greater risk to preterm infants despite the expectation of normal in utero brain growth. Esophageal atresia, diaphragmatic hernia and abdominal wall defects provide examples of congenital anomalies which have been shown to have poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes in the face of prematurity, with associated increased surgical complexity, higher relative cumulative doses of medications, longer hospital and intensive care stay and increased rates of feeding difficulties, compared with infants who experience either prematurity or congenital anomalies alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92845322022-07-16 Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review Gunn-Charlton, Julia K. Front Physiol Physiology Preterm infants are more likely to be born with congenital anomalies than those who are born at full-term. Conversely, neonates born with congenital anomalies are also more likely to be born preterm than those without congenital anomalies. Moreover, the comorbid impact of prematurity and congenital anomalies is more than cumulative. Multiple common factors increase the risk of brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment in both preterm babies and those born with congenital anomalies. These include prolonged hospital length of stay, feeding difficulties, nutritional deficits, pain exposure and administration of medications including sedatives and analgesics. Congenital heart disease provides a well-studied example of the impact of comorbid disease with prematurity. Impaired brain growth and maturity is well described in the third trimester in this population; the immature brain is subsequently more vulnerable to further injury. There is a colinear relationship between degree of prematurity and outcome both in terms of mortality and neurological morbidity. Both prematurity and relative brain immaturity independently increase the risk of subsequent neurodevelopmental impairment in infants with CHD. Non-cardiac surgery also poses a greater risk to preterm infants despite the expectation of normal in utero brain growth. Esophageal atresia, diaphragmatic hernia and abdominal wall defects provide examples of congenital anomalies which have been shown to have poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes in the face of prematurity, with associated increased surgical complexity, higher relative cumulative doses of medications, longer hospital and intensive care stay and increased rates of feeding difficulties, compared with infants who experience either prematurity or congenital anomalies alone. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9284532/ /pubmed/35846015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.880891 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gunn-Charlton. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Gunn-Charlton, Julia K.
Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title_full Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title_fullStr Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title_short Impact of Comorbid Prematurity and Congenital Anomalies: A Review
title_sort impact of comorbid prematurity and congenital anomalies: a review
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.880891
work_keys_str_mv AT gunncharltonjuliak impactofcomorbidprematurityandcongenitalanomaliesareview