Cargando…

Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial

Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, David G., Orgill, Dennis P., Galiano, Robert D., Glat, Paul M., Kaufman, Jarrod P., Carter, Marissa J., DiDomenico, Lawrence A., Zelen, Charles M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715
_version_ 1784747607105470464
author Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
Kaufman, Jarrod P.
Carter, Marissa J.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Zelen, Charles M.
author_facet Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
Kaufman, Jarrod P.
Carter, Marissa J.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Zelen, Charles M.
author_sort Armstrong, David G.
collection PubMed
description Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised trial comparing outcomes of PRBM at 12 weeks compared with a standard of care (SOC) using a collagen alginate dressing. The primary endpoint was percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications, healing time, quality of life, and cost to closure. Forty patients were included in an intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analysis, with 39 completing the study protocol (n = 19 PRBM, n = 20 SOC). Wounds treated with PRBM were significantly more likely to close than wounds treated with SOC (ITT: 85% vs 30%, P = .0004, PP: 94% vs 30% P = .00008), healed significantly faster (mean 37 days vs 67 days for SOC, P = .002), and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 96% vs 8.9% for SOC. No adverse events (AEs) directly related to PRBM treatment were reported. Mean PRBM cost of healing was $1731. Use of PRBM was safe and effective for treatment of chronic DFUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92846372022-07-19 Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Carter, Marissa J. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Zelen, Charles M. Int Wound J Original Articles Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised trial comparing outcomes of PRBM at 12 weeks compared with a standard of care (SOC) using a collagen alginate dressing. The primary endpoint was percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications, healing time, quality of life, and cost to closure. Forty patients were included in an intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analysis, with 39 completing the study protocol (n = 19 PRBM, n = 20 SOC). Wounds treated with PRBM were significantly more likely to close than wounds treated with SOC (ITT: 85% vs 30%, P = .0004, PP: 94% vs 30% P = .00008), healed significantly faster (mean 37 days vs 67 days for SOC, P = .002), and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 96% vs 8.9% for SOC. No adverse events (AEs) directly related to PRBM treatment were reported. Mean PRBM cost of healing was $1731. Use of PRBM was safe and effective for treatment of chronic DFUs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9284637/ /pubmed/35001559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Armstrong, David G.
Orgill, Dennis P.
Galiano, Robert D.
Glat, Paul M.
Kaufman, Jarrod P.
Carter, Marissa J.
DiDomenico, Lawrence A.
Zelen, Charles M.
Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title_full Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title_fullStr Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title_short Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
title_sort use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongdavidg useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT orgilldennisp useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT galianorobertd useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT glatpaulm useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT kaufmanjarrodp useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT cartermarissaj useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT didomenicolawrencea useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial
AT zelencharlesm useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial