Cargando…
Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial
Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised tri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715 |
_version_ | 1784747607105470464 |
---|---|
author | Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Carter, Marissa J. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_facet | Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Carter, Marissa J. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Zelen, Charles M. |
author_sort | Armstrong, David G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised trial comparing outcomes of PRBM at 12 weeks compared with a standard of care (SOC) using a collagen alginate dressing. The primary endpoint was percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications, healing time, quality of life, and cost to closure. Forty patients were included in an intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analysis, with 39 completing the study protocol (n = 19 PRBM, n = 20 SOC). Wounds treated with PRBM were significantly more likely to close than wounds treated with SOC (ITT: 85% vs 30%, P = .0004, PP: 94% vs 30% P = .00008), healed significantly faster (mean 37 days vs 67 days for SOC, P = .002), and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 96% vs 8.9% for SOC. No adverse events (AEs) directly related to PRBM treatment were reported. Mean PRBM cost of healing was $1731. Use of PRBM was safe and effective for treatment of chronic DFUs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92846372022-07-19 Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Carter, Marissa J. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Zelen, Charles M. Int Wound J Original Articles Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi‐centre randomised trial comparing outcomes of PRBM at 12 weeks compared with a standard of care (SOC) using a collagen alginate dressing. The primary endpoint was percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications, healing time, quality of life, and cost to closure. Forty patients were included in an intent‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analysis, with 39 completing the study protocol (n = 19 PRBM, n = 20 SOC). Wounds treated with PRBM were significantly more likely to close than wounds treated with SOC (ITT: 85% vs 30%, P = .0004, PP: 94% vs 30% P = .00008), healed significantly faster (mean 37 days vs 67 days for SOC, P = .002), and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 96% vs 8.9% for SOC. No adverse events (AEs) directly related to PRBM treatment were reported. Mean PRBM cost of healing was $1731. Use of PRBM was safe and effective for treatment of chronic DFUs. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9284637/ /pubmed/35001559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Armstrong, David G. Orgill, Dennis P. Galiano, Robert D. Glat, Paul M. Kaufman, Jarrod P. Carter, Marissa J. DiDomenico, Lawrence A. Zelen, Charles M. Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title | Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title_full | Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title_short | Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
title_sort | use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: results of a prospective randomised controlled multi‐centre clinical trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35001559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armstrongdavidg useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT orgilldennisp useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT galianorobertd useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT glatpaulm useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT kaufmanjarrodp useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT cartermarissaj useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT didomenicolawrencea useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial AT zelencharlesm useofapurifiedreconstitutedbilayermatrixinthemanagementofchronicdiabeticfootulcersimprovespatientoutcomesvsstandardofcareresultsofaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledmulticentreclinicaltrial |