Cargando…

A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jingwei, Zhu, Wencheng, Zhou, Junshan, Yun, Wenwei, Li, Xiaobo, Guan, Qiaochu, Lv, Weiping, Cheng, Yue, Ni, Huanyu, Xie, Ziyi, Li, Mengyun, Zhang, Lu, Xu, Yun, Zhang, Qingxiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285
_version_ 1784747615334694912
author Li, Jingwei
Zhu, Wencheng
Zhou, Junshan
Yun, Wenwei
Li, Xiaobo
Guan, Qiaochu
Lv, Weiping
Cheng, Yue
Ni, Huanyu
Xie, Ziyi
Li, Mengyun
Zhang, Lu
Xu, Yun
Zhang, Qingxiu
author_facet Li, Jingwei
Zhu, Wencheng
Zhou, Junshan
Yun, Wenwei
Li, Xiaobo
Guan, Qiaochu
Lv, Weiping
Cheng, Yue
Ni, Huanyu
Xie, Ziyi
Li, Mengyun
Zhang, Lu
Xu, Yun
Zhang, Qingxiu
author_sort Li, Jingwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. METHODS: A total of 973 patients were enrolled, primary outcome was assessed with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, and favorable outcome was defined using mRS 0–2 scores. Besides, LightGBM algorithm and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct a prediction model. Then, a prediction scale was further established and verified by both internal data and other external data. RESULTS: A total of 20 presurgical variables were analyzed using LR and LightGBM. The results of LightGBM algorithm indicated that the accuracy and precision of the prediction model were 73.77 and 73.16%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.824. Furthermore, the top 5 variables suggesting unfavorable outcomes were namely admitting blood glucose levels, age, onset to EVT time, onset to hospital time, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (importance = 130.9, 102.6, 96.5, 89.5 and 84.4, respectively). According to AUC, we established the key cutoff points and constructed prediction scale based on their respective weightings. Then, the established prediction scale was verified in raw and external data and the sensitivity was 80.4 and 83.5%, respectively. Finally, scores >3 demonstrated better accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Presurgical prediction scale is feasible and accurate in identifying unfavorable outcomes of AIS after EVT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92846742022-07-16 A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Li, Jingwei Zhu, Wencheng Zhou, Junshan Yun, Wenwei Li, Xiaobo Guan, Qiaochu Lv, Weiping Cheng, Yue Ni, Huanyu Xie, Ziyi Li, Mengyun Zhang, Lu Xu, Yun Zhang, Qingxiu Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. METHODS: A total of 973 patients were enrolled, primary outcome was assessed with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, and favorable outcome was defined using mRS 0–2 scores. Besides, LightGBM algorithm and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct a prediction model. Then, a prediction scale was further established and verified by both internal data and other external data. RESULTS: A total of 20 presurgical variables were analyzed using LR and LightGBM. The results of LightGBM algorithm indicated that the accuracy and precision of the prediction model were 73.77 and 73.16%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.824. Furthermore, the top 5 variables suggesting unfavorable outcomes were namely admitting blood glucose levels, age, onset to EVT time, onset to hospital time, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (importance = 130.9, 102.6, 96.5, 89.5 and 84.4, respectively). According to AUC, we established the key cutoff points and constructed prediction scale based on their respective weightings. Then, the established prediction scale was verified in raw and external data and the sensitivity was 80.4 and 83.5%, respectively. Finally, scores >3 demonstrated better accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Presurgical prediction scale is feasible and accurate in identifying unfavorable outcomes of AIS after EVT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9284674/ /pubmed/35847671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Zhu, Zhou, Yun, Li, Guan, Lv, Cheng, Ni, Xie, Li, Zhang, Xu and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging Neuroscience
Li, Jingwei
Zhu, Wencheng
Zhou, Junshan
Yun, Wenwei
Li, Xiaobo
Guan, Qiaochu
Lv, Weiping
Cheng, Yue
Ni, Huanyu
Xie, Ziyi
Li, Mengyun
Zhang, Lu
Xu, Yun
Zhang, Qingxiu
A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_full A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_fullStr A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_full_unstemmed A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_short A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
title_sort presurgical unfavorable prediction scale of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke
topic Aging Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285
work_keys_str_mv AT lijingwei apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhuwencheng apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhoujunshan apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT yunwenwei apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT lixiaobo apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT guanqiaochu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT lvweiping apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT chengyue apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT nihuanyu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT xieziyi apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT limengyun apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhanglu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT xuyun apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhangqingxiu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT lijingwei presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhuwencheng presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhoujunshan presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT yunwenwei presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT lixiaobo presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT guanqiaochu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT lvweiping presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT chengyue presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT nihuanyu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT xieziyi presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT limengyun presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhanglu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT xuyun presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke
AT zhangqingxiu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke