Cargando…
A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285 |
_version_ | 1784747615334694912 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jingwei Zhu, Wencheng Zhou, Junshan Yun, Wenwei Li, Xiaobo Guan, Qiaochu Lv, Weiping Cheng, Yue Ni, Huanyu Xie, Ziyi Li, Mengyun Zhang, Lu Xu, Yun Zhang, Qingxiu |
author_facet | Li, Jingwei Zhu, Wencheng Zhou, Junshan Yun, Wenwei Li, Xiaobo Guan, Qiaochu Lv, Weiping Cheng, Yue Ni, Huanyu Xie, Ziyi Li, Mengyun Zhang, Lu Xu, Yun Zhang, Qingxiu |
author_sort | Li, Jingwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. METHODS: A total of 973 patients were enrolled, primary outcome was assessed with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, and favorable outcome was defined using mRS 0–2 scores. Besides, LightGBM algorithm and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct a prediction model. Then, a prediction scale was further established and verified by both internal data and other external data. RESULTS: A total of 20 presurgical variables were analyzed using LR and LightGBM. The results of LightGBM algorithm indicated that the accuracy and precision of the prediction model were 73.77 and 73.16%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.824. Furthermore, the top 5 variables suggesting unfavorable outcomes were namely admitting blood glucose levels, age, onset to EVT time, onset to hospital time, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (importance = 130.9, 102.6, 96.5, 89.5 and 84.4, respectively). According to AUC, we established the key cutoff points and constructed prediction scale based on their respective weightings. Then, the established prediction scale was verified in raw and external data and the sensitivity was 80.4 and 83.5%, respectively. Finally, scores >3 demonstrated better accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Presurgical prediction scale is feasible and accurate in identifying unfavorable outcomes of AIS after EVT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284674 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92846742022-07-16 A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke Li, Jingwei Zhu, Wencheng Zhou, Junshan Yun, Wenwei Li, Xiaobo Guan, Qiaochu Lv, Weiping Cheng, Yue Ni, Huanyu Xie, Ziyi Li, Mengyun Zhang, Lu Xu, Yun Zhang, Qingxiu Front Aging Neurosci Aging Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic prediction model of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) induced by large-vessel occlusion (LVO), this study applied machine learning classification model light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to construct a unique prediction model. METHODS: A total of 973 patients were enrolled, primary outcome was assessed with modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, and favorable outcome was defined using mRS 0–2 scores. Besides, LightGBM algorithm and logistic regression (LR) were used to construct a prediction model. Then, a prediction scale was further established and verified by both internal data and other external data. RESULTS: A total of 20 presurgical variables were analyzed using LR and LightGBM. The results of LightGBM algorithm indicated that the accuracy and precision of the prediction model were 73.77 and 73.16%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.824. Furthermore, the top 5 variables suggesting unfavorable outcomes were namely admitting blood glucose levels, age, onset to EVT time, onset to hospital time, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (importance = 130.9, 102.6, 96.5, 89.5 and 84.4, respectively). According to AUC, we established the key cutoff points and constructed prediction scale based on their respective weightings. Then, the established prediction scale was verified in raw and external data and the sensitivity was 80.4 and 83.5%, respectively. Finally, scores >3 demonstrated better accuracy in predicting unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Presurgical prediction scale is feasible and accurate in identifying unfavorable outcomes of AIS after EVT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9284674/ /pubmed/35847671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Zhu, Zhou, Yun, Li, Guan, Lv, Cheng, Ni, Xie, Li, Zhang, Xu and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Aging Neuroscience Li, Jingwei Zhu, Wencheng Zhou, Junshan Yun, Wenwei Li, Xiaobo Guan, Qiaochu Lv, Weiping Cheng, Yue Ni, Huanyu Xie, Ziyi Li, Mengyun Zhang, Lu Xu, Yun Zhang, Qingxiu A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title | A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full | A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_fullStr | A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_short | A Presurgical Unfavorable Prediction Scale of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke |
title_sort | presurgical unfavorable prediction scale of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke |
topic | Aging Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284674/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35847671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.942285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijingwei apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhuwencheng apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhoujunshan apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT yunwenwei apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT lixiaobo apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT guanqiaochu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT lvweiping apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT chengyue apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT nihuanyu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT xieziyi apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT limengyun apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhanglu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT xuyun apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhangqingxiu apresurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT lijingwei presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhuwencheng presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhoujunshan presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT yunwenwei presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT lixiaobo presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT guanqiaochu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT lvweiping presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT chengyue presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT nihuanyu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT xieziyi presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT limengyun presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhanglu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT xuyun presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke AT zhangqingxiu presurgicalunfavorablepredictionscaleofendovasculartreatmentforacuteischemicstroke |