Cargando…
Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35841059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w |
_version_ | 1784747660080578560 |
---|---|
author | Yerrabelli, Rahul S. Peterman, Nicholas Kaptur, Bradley Yeo, Eunhae Carpenter, Kristine |
author_facet | Yerrabelli, Rahul S. Peterman, Nicholas Kaptur, Bradley Yeo, Eunhae Carpenter, Kristine |
author_sort | Yerrabelli, Rahul S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally sourced from National Center for Health Statistics. County-level demographic data were extracted from the US Census Bureau. Access to obstetricians was extracted from National Provider Identifier records. Rural counties were identified using Rural Urban Commuting Area codes developed by the department of agriculture. The dataset was geospatially analyzed using Moran’s I statistic, a metric of local spatial autocorrelation, to identify clusters of increased or decreased Cesarean section rates. The American South, especially the Deep South, is a major cluster of increased Cesarean section rates. As a general but not absolute pattern, the American West and Midwest had lower Cesarean section rates than the Northeast. Focal areas of increased Cesarean section rates included the Kansas-Nebraska border, Michigan’s upper peninsula, and the New York City metropolitan area. The gross geospatial differences were not explained by rurality, obstetric access, or ethnic and racial factors alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92848732022-07-16 Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA Yerrabelli, Rahul S. Peterman, Nicholas Kaptur, Bradley Yeo, Eunhae Carpenter, Kristine BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally sourced from National Center for Health Statistics. County-level demographic data were extracted from the US Census Bureau. Access to obstetricians was extracted from National Provider Identifier records. Rural counties were identified using Rural Urban Commuting Area codes developed by the department of agriculture. The dataset was geospatially analyzed using Moran’s I statistic, a metric of local spatial autocorrelation, to identify clusters of increased or decreased Cesarean section rates. The American South, especially the Deep South, is a major cluster of increased Cesarean section rates. As a general but not absolute pattern, the American West and Midwest had lower Cesarean section rates than the Northeast. Focal areas of increased Cesarean section rates included the Kansas-Nebraska border, Michigan’s upper peninsula, and the New York City metropolitan area. The gross geospatial differences were not explained by rurality, obstetric access, or ethnic and racial factors alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w. BioMed Central 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9284873/ /pubmed/35841059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Yerrabelli, Rahul S. Peterman, Nicholas Kaptur, Bradley Yeo, Eunhae Carpenter, Kristine Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title | Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title_full | Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title_fullStr | Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title_short | Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA |
title_sort | geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the usa |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35841059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yerrabellirahuls geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa AT petermannicholas geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa AT kapturbradley geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa AT yeoeunhae geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa AT carpenterkristine geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa |