Cargando…

Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yerrabelli, Rahul S., Peterman, Nicholas, Kaptur, Bradley, Yeo, Eunhae, Carpenter, Kristine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35841059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w
_version_ 1784747660080578560
author Yerrabelli, Rahul S.
Peterman, Nicholas
Kaptur, Bradley
Yeo, Eunhae
Carpenter, Kristine
author_facet Yerrabelli, Rahul S.
Peterman, Nicholas
Kaptur, Bradley
Yeo, Eunhae
Carpenter, Kristine
author_sort Yerrabelli, Rahul S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally sourced from National Center for Health Statistics. County-level demographic data were extracted from the US Census Bureau. Access to obstetricians was extracted from National Provider Identifier records. Rural counties were identified using Rural Urban Commuting Area codes developed by the department of agriculture. The dataset was geospatially analyzed using Moran’s I statistic, a metric of local spatial autocorrelation, to identify clusters of increased or decreased Cesarean section rates. The American South, especially the Deep South, is a major cluster of increased Cesarean section rates. As a general but not absolute pattern, the American West and Midwest had lower Cesarean section rates than the Northeast. Focal areas of increased Cesarean section rates included the Kansas-Nebraska border, Michigan’s upper peninsula, and the New York City metropolitan area. The gross geospatial differences were not explained by rurality, obstetric access, or ethnic and racial factors alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92848732022-07-16 Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA Yerrabelli, Rahul S. Peterman, Nicholas Kaptur, Bradley Yeo, Eunhae Carpenter, Kristine BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the existence of statistically significant clusters of Cesarean section rates at the county level and assess the relationship of such clusters with previously implicated socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: County-level obstetrics data was extracted from March of Dimes, originally sourced from National Center for Health Statistics. County-level demographic data were extracted from the US Census Bureau. Access to obstetricians was extracted from National Provider Identifier records. Rural counties were identified using Rural Urban Commuting Area codes developed by the department of agriculture. The dataset was geospatially analyzed using Moran’s I statistic, a metric of local spatial autocorrelation, to identify clusters of increased or decreased Cesarean section rates. The American South, especially the Deep South, is a major cluster of increased Cesarean section rates. As a general but not absolute pattern, the American West and Midwest had lower Cesarean section rates than the Northeast. Focal areas of increased Cesarean section rates included the Kansas-Nebraska border, Michigan’s upper peninsula, and the New York City metropolitan area. The gross geospatial differences were not explained by rurality, obstetric access, or ethnic and racial factors alone. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w. BioMed Central 2022-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9284873/ /pubmed/35841059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Yerrabelli, Rahul S.
Peterman, Nicholas
Kaptur, Bradley
Yeo, Eunhae
Carpenter, Kristine
Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title_full Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title_fullStr Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title_full_unstemmed Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title_short Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA
title_sort geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the usa
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35841059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yerrabellirahuls geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa
AT petermannicholas geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa
AT kapturbradley geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa
AT yeoeunhae geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa
AT carpenterkristine geospatialdistributionofrelativecesareansectionrateswithintheusa