Cargando…
An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x |
_version_ | 1784747667418513408 |
---|---|
author | Morgans, Alicia K. Hutson, Thomas Guan, Alice Kai Dan Garcia, David Zhou, Anna Drea, Edward Vogelzang, Nicholas J. |
author_facet | Morgans, Alicia K. Hutson, Thomas Guan, Alice Kai Dan Garcia, David Zhou, Anna Drea, Edward Vogelzang, Nicholas J. |
author_sort | Morgans, Alicia K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care. RESULTS: At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92849072022-07-16 An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective Morgans, Alicia K. Hutson, Thomas Guan, Alice Kai Dan Garcia, David Zhou, Anna Drea, Edward Vogelzang, Nicholas J. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care. RESULTS: At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9284907/ /pubmed/35836170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Morgans, Alicia K. Hutson, Thomas Guan, Alice Kai Dan Garcia, David Zhou, Anna Drea, Edward Vogelzang, Nicholas J. An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title | An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title_full | An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title_fullStr | An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title_short | An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective |
title_sort | economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (arta) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an arta: the united states payer perspective |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morgansaliciak aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT hutsonthomas aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT guanalicekaidan aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT garciadavid aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT zhouanna aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT dreaedward aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT vogelzangnicholasj aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT morgansaliciak economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT hutsonthomas economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT guanalicekaidan economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT garciadavid economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT zhouanna economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT dreaedward economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective AT vogelzangnicholasj economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective |