Cargando…

An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgans, Alicia K., Hutson, Thomas, Guan, Alice Kai Dan, Garcia, David, Zhou, Anna, Drea, Edward, Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x
_version_ 1784747667418513408
author Morgans, Alicia K.
Hutson, Thomas
Guan, Alice Kai Dan
Garcia, David
Zhou, Anna
Drea, Edward
Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
author_facet Morgans, Alicia K.
Hutson, Thomas
Guan, Alice Kai Dan
Garcia, David
Zhou, Anna
Drea, Edward
Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
author_sort Morgans, Alicia K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care. RESULTS: At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9284907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92849072022-07-16 An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective Morgans, Alicia K. Hutson, Thomas Guan, Alice Kai Dan Garcia, David Zhou, Anna Drea, Edward Vogelzang, Nicholas J. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel significantly improves clinical outcomes compared with a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA (abiraterone or enzalutamide), as demonstrated in the CARD trial (NCT02485691). We aimed to estimate healthcare costs avoided with the use of cabazitaxel as a third-line (3 L) treatment versus a second ARTA from a US payer perspective. METHODS: Model inputs were based on the CARD trial, published sources, and estimates of typical clinical care patterns by genitourinary oncologists (n = 3). Assessed time points were 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS); hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) days; and costs (reported in 2020 US dollar [USD] and converted into Euro) to manage symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs), adverse events (AEs), and end-of-life care. RESULTS: At 18 months, in a cohort of 100 patients, the use of cabazitaxel was estimated to result in 9 more patients achieving rPFS, 2 more patients achieving PFS, and 17 more survivors versus a second ARTA. The costs of SSEs, AEs, and end-of-life care were $498,909 (€424,073), $276,198 (€234,768), and $808,785 (€687,468), respectively, for cabazitaxel and $627,569 (€533,434), $251,124 (€213,455), and $1,028,294 (€874,050), respectively, for a second ARTA. Cabazitaxel was estimated to be associated with a 21% reduction in both SSE management and end-of-life care costs. Hospitalization cost was $1,442,870 (€1,226,440) for cabazitaxel and $1,728,394 (€1,469,135) for a second ARTA, representing an estimated 17% reduction in these costs. Cabazitaxel, as compared with a second ARTA, was associated with 58 fewer hospitalization days and 2 fewer ICU days and was estimated to avoid $323,095 (€274,630, 17%) in total costs, driven by SSEs management and end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: The use of cabazitaxel as a 3 L treatment after docetaxel and an ARTA in patients with mCRPC is estimated to result in clinical benefits (longer rPFS, PFS, and OS) and lower healthcare resource utilization (fewer hospitalization and ICU days), compared with a second ARTA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x. BioMed Central 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9284907/ /pubmed/35836170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Morgans, Alicia K.
Hutson, Thomas
Guan, Alice Kai Dan
Garcia, David
Zhou, Anna
Drea, Edward
Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title_full An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title_fullStr An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title_full_unstemmed An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title_short An economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (ARTA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA: the United States payer perspective
title_sort economic evaluation of cabazitaxel versus a second androgen receptor-targeted agent (arta) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel and an arta: the united states payer perspective
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35836170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08274-x
work_keys_str_mv AT morgansaliciak aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT hutsonthomas aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT guanalicekaidan aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT garciadavid aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT zhouanna aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT dreaedward aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT vogelzangnicholasj aneconomicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT morgansaliciak economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT hutsonthomas economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT guanalicekaidan economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT garciadavid economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT zhouanna economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT dreaedward economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective
AT vogelzangnicholasj economicevaluationofcabazitaxelversusasecondandrogenreceptortargetedagentartaforpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerpreviouslytreatedwithdocetaxelandanartatheunitedstatespayerperspective