Cargando…
Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging
BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) serves as a noninvasive stereotactic system for the ablation of brain metastases; however, treatments are limited to simple geometries and energy delivery is limited by the high acoustic attenuation of the calvarium. Minimally-invasive magnetic re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34148489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1936215 |
_version_ | 1784747685344968704 |
---|---|
author | Campwala, Zahabiya Szewczyk, Benjamin Maietta, Teresa Trowbridge, Rachel Tarasek, Matthew Bhushan, Chitresh Fiveland, Eric Ghoshal, Goutam Heffter, Tamas Gandomi, Katie Carvalho, Paulo Alberto Nycz, Christopher Jeannotte, Erin Staudt, Michael Nalwalk, Julia Hellman, Abigail Zhao, Zhanyue Burdette, E. Clif Fischer, Gregory Yeo, Desmond Pilitsis, Julie G. |
author_facet | Campwala, Zahabiya Szewczyk, Benjamin Maietta, Teresa Trowbridge, Rachel Tarasek, Matthew Bhushan, Chitresh Fiveland, Eric Ghoshal, Goutam Heffter, Tamas Gandomi, Katie Carvalho, Paulo Alberto Nycz, Christopher Jeannotte, Erin Staudt, Michael Nalwalk, Julia Hellman, Abigail Zhao, Zhanyue Burdette, E. Clif Fischer, Gregory Yeo, Desmond Pilitsis, Julie G. |
author_sort | Campwala, Zahabiya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) serves as a noninvasive stereotactic system for the ablation of brain metastases; however, treatments are limited to simple geometries and energy delivery is limited by the high acoustic attenuation of the calvarium. Minimally-invasive magnetic resonance-guided robotically-assisted (MRgRA) needle-based therapeutic ultrasound (NBTU) using multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) overcomes these limitations and has potential to produce less collateral tissue damage than current methods. OBJECTIVE: To correlate multislice volumetric 2-D MRTI volumes with histologically confirmed regions of tissue damage in MRgRA NBTU. METHODS: Seven swine underwent a total of 8 frontal MRgRA NBTU lesions. MRTI ablation volumes were compared to histologic tissue damage on brain sections stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). Bland-Altman analyses and correlation trends were used to compare MRTI and TTC ablation volumes. RESULTS: Data from the initial and third swine’s ablations were excluded due to sub-optimal tissue staining. For the remaining ablations (n = 6), the limits of agreement between the MRTI and histologic volumes ranged from −0.149 cm(3) to 0.252 cm(3) with a mean difference of 0.052 ±0.042 cm(3) (11.1%). There was a high correlation between the MRTI and histology volumes (r(2) = 0.831) with a strong linear relationship (r = 0.868). CONCLUSION: We used a volumetric MRTI technique to accurately track thermal changes during MRgRA NBTU in preparation for human trials. Improved volumetric coverage with MRTI enhanced our delivery of therapy and has far-reaching implications for focused ultrasound in the broader clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9284994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92849942022-07-15 Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging Campwala, Zahabiya Szewczyk, Benjamin Maietta, Teresa Trowbridge, Rachel Tarasek, Matthew Bhushan, Chitresh Fiveland, Eric Ghoshal, Goutam Heffter, Tamas Gandomi, Katie Carvalho, Paulo Alberto Nycz, Christopher Jeannotte, Erin Staudt, Michael Nalwalk, Julia Hellman, Abigail Zhao, Zhanyue Burdette, E. Clif Fischer, Gregory Yeo, Desmond Pilitsis, Julie G. Int J Hyperthermia Article BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) serves as a noninvasive stereotactic system for the ablation of brain metastases; however, treatments are limited to simple geometries and energy delivery is limited by the high acoustic attenuation of the calvarium. Minimally-invasive magnetic resonance-guided robotically-assisted (MRgRA) needle-based therapeutic ultrasound (NBTU) using multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) overcomes these limitations and has potential to produce less collateral tissue damage than current methods. OBJECTIVE: To correlate multislice volumetric 2-D MRTI volumes with histologically confirmed regions of tissue damage in MRgRA NBTU. METHODS: Seven swine underwent a total of 8 frontal MRgRA NBTU lesions. MRTI ablation volumes were compared to histologic tissue damage on brain sections stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC). Bland-Altman analyses and correlation trends were used to compare MRTI and TTC ablation volumes. RESULTS: Data from the initial and third swine’s ablations were excluded due to sub-optimal tissue staining. For the remaining ablations (n = 6), the limits of agreement between the MRTI and histologic volumes ranged from −0.149 cm(3) to 0.252 cm(3) with a mean difference of 0.052 ±0.042 cm(3) (11.1%). There was a high correlation between the MRTI and histology volumes (r(2) = 0.831) with a strong linear relationship (r = 0.868). CONCLUSION: We used a volumetric MRTI technique to accurately track thermal changes during MRgRA NBTU in preparation for human trials. Improved volumetric coverage with MRTI enhanced our delivery of therapy and has far-reaching implications for focused ultrasound in the broader clinical setting. 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC9284994/ /pubmed/34148489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1936215 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Campwala, Zahabiya Szewczyk, Benjamin Maietta, Teresa Trowbridge, Rachel Tarasek, Matthew Bhushan, Chitresh Fiveland, Eric Ghoshal, Goutam Heffter, Tamas Gandomi, Katie Carvalho, Paulo Alberto Nycz, Christopher Jeannotte, Erin Staudt, Michael Nalwalk, Julia Hellman, Abigail Zhao, Zhanyue Burdette, E. Clif Fischer, Gregory Yeo, Desmond Pilitsis, Julie G. Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title | Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title_full | Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title_fullStr | Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title_short | Predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
title_sort | predicting ablation zones with multislice volumetric 2-d magnetic resonance thermal imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9284994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34148489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1936215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campwalazahabiya predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT szewczykbenjamin predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT maiettateresa predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT trowbridgerachel predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT tarasekmatthew predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT bhushanchitresh predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT fivelanderic predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT ghoshalgoutam predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT hefftertamas predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT gandomikatie predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT carvalhopauloalberto predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT nyczchristopher predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT jeannotteerin predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT staudtmichael predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT nalwalkjulia predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT hellmanabigail predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT zhaozhanyue predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT burdetteeclif predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT fischergregory predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT yeodesmond predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging AT pilitsisjulieg predictingablationzoneswithmultislicevolumetric2dmagneticresonancethermalimaging |