Cargando…

Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial

PURPOSE: Overall complication and leak rates in colorectal surgery showed only minor improvements over the last years and remain still high. While the introduction of the WHO Safer Surgery Checklist has shown a reduction of overall operative mortality and morbidity in general surgery, only minor att...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiesler, Benjamin, Gass, Jörn-Markus, Viehl, Carsten Th., Müller, Alexandra, Metzger, Jürg, Hartel, Mark, Nebiker, Christian, Rosenberg, Robert, Galli, Raffaele, Zingg, Urs, Ochsner, Alex, Eisner, Lukas, Pabst, Martina, Worni, Mathias, Henschel, Mark, von Flüe, Markus, Zuber, Markus, von Strauss und Torney, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJS Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891921
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.177
_version_ 1784747686099943424
author Wiesler, Benjamin
Gass, Jörn-Markus
Viehl, Carsten Th.
Müller, Alexandra
Metzger, Jürg
Hartel, Mark
Nebiker, Christian
Rosenberg, Robert
Galli, Raffaele
Zingg, Urs
Ochsner, Alex
Eisner, Lukas
Pabst, Martina
Worni, Mathias
Henschel, Mark
von Flüe, Markus
Zuber, Markus
von Strauss und Torney, Marco
author_facet Wiesler, Benjamin
Gass, Jörn-Markus
Viehl, Carsten Th.
Müller, Alexandra
Metzger, Jürg
Hartel, Mark
Nebiker, Christian
Rosenberg, Robert
Galli, Raffaele
Zingg, Urs
Ochsner, Alex
Eisner, Lukas
Pabst, Martina
Worni, Mathias
Henschel, Mark
von Flüe, Markus
Zuber, Markus
von Strauss und Torney, Marco
author_sort Wiesler, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Overall complication and leak rates in colorectal surgery showed only minor improvements over the last years and remain still high. While the introduction of the WHO Safer Surgery Checklist has shown a reduction of overall operative mortality and morbidity in general surgery, only minor attempts have been made to improve outcomes by standardizing perioperative processes in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, a number of singular interventions have been found reducing postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. The aim of the present study is to combine nine of these measures to a catalogue called colorectal bundle (CB). This will help to standardize pre-, intra-, and post-operative processes and therefore eventually reduce complication rates after colorectal surgery. METHODS: The study will be performed among nine contributing hospitals in the extended north-western part of Switzerland. In the 6-month lasting control period the patients will be treated according to the local standard of each contributing hospital. After a short implementation phase all patients will be treated according to the CB for another 6 months. Afterwards complication rates before and after the implementation of the CB will be compared. DISCUSSION: The overall complication rate in colorectal surgery is still high. The fact that only little progress has been made in recent years underlines the relevance of the current project. It has been shown for other areas of surgery that standardization is an effective measure of reducing postoperative complication rates. We hypothesize that the combination of effective, individual components into the CB can reduce the complication rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 11/03/2020; NCT04550156. HIGHLIGHTS: Purpose: Overall complications in colorectal surgery remain still high. Standardizing can reduce overall operative mortality and morbidity. Only minor attempts have been made to standardize perioperative processes in colorectal surgery. Singular interventions have been found reducing postoperative complications. The aim is to combine nine of these measures to a colorectal bundle (CB). The CB will help to reduce complication rates after colorectal surgery. Methods: The observational study will be performed among nine hospitals in Switzerland. Six month the patients will be treated according to the local standards. Afterwards patients will be treated according to the CB for another six months. Complication rates before and after the implementation of the CB will be compared. Discussion: Only little progress has been made to reduce complication rate in colorectal surgery. Standardization is an effective measure of reducing complication rates. The combination of effective, individual components into the CB can reduce the complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher IJS Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92850002022-07-25 Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial Wiesler, Benjamin Gass, Jörn-Markus Viehl, Carsten Th. Müller, Alexandra Metzger, Jürg Hartel, Mark Nebiker, Christian Rosenberg, Robert Galli, Raffaele Zingg, Urs Ochsner, Alex Eisner, Lukas Pabst, Martina Worni, Mathias Henschel, Mark von Flüe, Markus Zuber, Markus von Strauss und Torney, Marco Int J Surg Protoc Protocol PURPOSE: Overall complication and leak rates in colorectal surgery showed only minor improvements over the last years and remain still high. While the introduction of the WHO Safer Surgery Checklist has shown a reduction of overall operative mortality and morbidity in general surgery, only minor attempts have been made to improve outcomes by standardizing perioperative processes in colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, a number of singular interventions have been found reducing postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. The aim of the present study is to combine nine of these measures to a catalogue called colorectal bundle (CB). This will help to standardize pre-, intra-, and post-operative processes and therefore eventually reduce complication rates after colorectal surgery. METHODS: The study will be performed among nine contributing hospitals in the extended north-western part of Switzerland. In the 6-month lasting control period the patients will be treated according to the local standard of each contributing hospital. After a short implementation phase all patients will be treated according to the CB for another 6 months. Afterwards complication rates before and after the implementation of the CB will be compared. DISCUSSION: The overall complication rate in colorectal surgery is still high. The fact that only little progress has been made in recent years underlines the relevance of the current project. It has been shown for other areas of surgery that standardization is an effective measure of reducing postoperative complication rates. We hypothesize that the combination of effective, individual components into the CB can reduce the complication rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on 11/03/2020; NCT04550156. HIGHLIGHTS: Purpose: Overall complications in colorectal surgery remain still high. Standardizing can reduce overall operative mortality and morbidity. Only minor attempts have been made to standardize perioperative processes in colorectal surgery. Singular interventions have been found reducing postoperative complications. The aim is to combine nine of these measures to a colorectal bundle (CB). The CB will help to reduce complication rates after colorectal surgery. Methods: The observational study will be performed among nine hospitals in Switzerland. Six month the patients will be treated according to the local standards. Afterwards patients will be treated according to the CB for another six months. Complication rates before and after the implementation of the CB will be compared. Discussion: Only little progress has been made to reduce complication rate in colorectal surgery. Standardization is an effective measure of reducing complication rates. The combination of effective, individual components into the CB can reduce the complication rate. IJS Publishing Group 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9285000/ /pubmed/35891921 http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.177 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Protocol
Wiesler, Benjamin
Gass, Jörn-Markus
Viehl, Carsten Th.
Müller, Alexandra
Metzger, Jürg
Hartel, Mark
Nebiker, Christian
Rosenberg, Robert
Galli, Raffaele
Zingg, Urs
Ochsner, Alex
Eisner, Lukas
Pabst, Martina
Worni, Mathias
Henschel, Mark
von Flüe, Markus
Zuber, Markus
von Strauss und Torney, Marco
Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title_full Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title_short Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial
title_sort evaluation of the introduction of a colorectal bundle in left sided colorectal resections (evacol): study protocol of a multicentre, observational trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35891921
http://dx.doi.org/10.29337/ijsp.177
work_keys_str_mv AT wieslerbenjamin evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT gassjornmarkus evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT viehlcarstenth evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT mulleralexandra evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT metzgerjurg evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT hartelmark evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT nebikerchristian evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT rosenbergrobert evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT galliraffaele evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT zinggurs evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT ochsneralex evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT eisnerlukas evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT pabstmartina evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT wornimathias evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT henschelmark evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT vonfluemarkus evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT zubermarkus evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial
AT vonstraussundtorneymarco evaluationoftheintroductionofacolorectalbundleinleftsidedcolorectalresectionsevacolstudyprotocolofamulticentreobservationaltrial