Cargando…
Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography
Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MR‐EPT) is a technique used to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues from MR measurements of the transmit magnetic field. Different reconstruction methods are available; however, all these methods present several limitations, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4211 |
_version_ | 1784747694849261568 |
---|---|
author | Leijsen, Reijer van den Berg, Cornelis Webb, Andrew Remis, Rob Mandija, Stefano |
author_facet | Leijsen, Reijer van den Berg, Cornelis Webb, Andrew Remis, Rob Mandija, Stefano |
author_sort | Leijsen, Reijer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MR‐EPT) is a technique used to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues from MR measurements of the transmit magnetic field. Different reconstruction methods are available; however, all these methods present several limitations, which hamper the clinical applicability. Standard Helmholtz‐based MR‐EPT methods are severely affected by noise. Iterative reconstruction methods such as contrast source inversion electrical properties tomography (CSI‐EPT) are typically time‐consuming and are dependent on their initialization. Deep learning (DL) based methods require a large amount of training data before sufficient generalization can be achieved. Here, we investigate the benefits achievable using a hybrid approach, that is, using MR‐EPT or DL‐EPT as initialization guesses for standard 3D CSI‐EPT. Using realistic electromagnetic simulations at 3 and 7 T, the accuracy and precision of hybrid CSI reconstructions are compared with those of standard 3D CSI‐EPT reconstructions. Our results indicate that a hybrid method consisting of an initial DL‐EPT reconstruction followed by a 3D CSI‐EPT reconstruction would be beneficial. DL‐EPT combined with standard 3D CSI‐EPT exploits the power of data‐driven DL‐based EPT reconstructions, while the subsequent CSI‐EPT facilitates a better generalization by providing data consistency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92850352022-07-15 Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography Leijsen, Reijer van den Berg, Cornelis Webb, Andrew Remis, Rob Mandija, Stefano NMR Biomed Special Issue Research Articles Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography (MR‐EPT) is a technique used to estimate the conductivity and permittivity of tissues from MR measurements of the transmit magnetic field. Different reconstruction methods are available; however, all these methods present several limitations, which hamper the clinical applicability. Standard Helmholtz‐based MR‐EPT methods are severely affected by noise. Iterative reconstruction methods such as contrast source inversion electrical properties tomography (CSI‐EPT) are typically time‐consuming and are dependent on their initialization. Deep learning (DL) based methods require a large amount of training data before sufficient generalization can be achieved. Here, we investigate the benefits achievable using a hybrid approach, that is, using MR‐EPT or DL‐EPT as initialization guesses for standard 3D CSI‐EPT. Using realistic electromagnetic simulations at 3 and 7 T, the accuracy and precision of hybrid CSI reconstructions are compared with those of standard 3D CSI‐EPT reconstructions. Our results indicate that a hybrid method consisting of an initial DL‐EPT reconstruction followed by a 3D CSI‐EPT reconstruction would be beneficial. DL‐EPT combined with standard 3D CSI‐EPT exploits the power of data‐driven DL‐based EPT reconstructions, while the subsequent CSI‐EPT facilitates a better generalization by providing data consistency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-16 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9285035/ /pubmed/31840897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4211 Text en © 2019 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Research Articles Leijsen, Reijer van den Berg, Cornelis Webb, Andrew Remis, Rob Mandija, Stefano Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title | Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title_full | Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title_fullStr | Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title_short | Combining deep learning and 3D contrast source inversion in MR‐based electrical properties tomography |
title_sort | combining deep learning and 3d contrast source inversion in mr‐based electrical properties tomography |
topic | Special Issue Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leijsenreijer combiningdeeplearningand3dcontrastsourceinversioninmrbasedelectricalpropertiestomography AT vandenbergcornelis combiningdeeplearningand3dcontrastsourceinversioninmrbasedelectricalpropertiestomography AT webbandrew combiningdeeplearningand3dcontrastsourceinversioninmrbasedelectricalpropertiestomography AT remisrob combiningdeeplearningand3dcontrastsourceinversioninmrbasedelectricalpropertiestomography AT mandijastefano combiningdeeplearningand3dcontrastsourceinversioninmrbasedelectricalpropertiestomography |