Cargando…

Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are often diagnosed with comorbid substance misuse (SM), which is associated with poor treatment efficacy. Although literature indicates similar inhibitory control deficits in both conditions, it is unclear whether SM in ADHD exaggerates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paraskevopoulou, Maria, van Rooij, Daan, Schene, Aart H., Chauvin, Roselyne, Buitelaar, Jan K., Schellekens, Arnt F. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adb.13063
_version_ 1784747697066999808
author Paraskevopoulou, Maria
van Rooij, Daan
Schene, Aart H.
Chauvin, Roselyne
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Schellekens, Arnt F. A.
author_facet Paraskevopoulou, Maria
van Rooij, Daan
Schene, Aart H.
Chauvin, Roselyne
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Schellekens, Arnt F. A.
author_sort Paraskevopoulou, Maria
collection PubMed
description Patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are often diagnosed with comorbid substance misuse (SM), which is associated with poor treatment efficacy. Although literature indicates similar inhibitory control deficits in both conditions, it is unclear whether SM in ADHD exaggerates pre‐existing deficits, with additive or distinct impairments in patients. Our aim was to examine SM effects on inhibitory control in ADHD. Behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from a stop‐signal task were compared across ADHD patients with and without SM (ADHD + SM and ADHD‐only, respectively) and controls (n = 33/group; 79 males, mean age 18.02 ± 2.45). To limit substance use disorder (SUD) trait effects, groups were matched for parental SUD. Overall, we found worse performance for ADHD‐only and/or ADHD + SM compared with controls but no difference between the ADHD groups. Moreover, the ADHD groups showed decreased frontostriatal and frontoparietal activity during successful and failed stop trials. There were no differences between the ADHD groups in superior frontal nodes, but there was more decreased activation in temporal/parietal nodes in ADHD‐only compared with ADHD + SM. During go‐trials, ADHD + SM showed decreased activation in inferior frontal nodes compared with ADHD‐only and controls. Findings during response inhibition showed deficits in inhibition and attentional processes for ADHD patients with and without SM. Despite no evidence for SM effects during response inhibition, results during go‐trials suggest distinct effects on nodes that are associated with several executive functions. Future studies should investigate whether distinct deficits in ADHD + SM relate to poor treatment results and can direct development of distinct ADHD treatment strategies for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92850452022-07-15 Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder Paraskevopoulou, Maria van Rooij, Daan Schene, Aart H. Chauvin, Roselyne Buitelaar, Jan K. Schellekens, Arnt F. A. Addict Biol Original Articles Patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are often diagnosed with comorbid substance misuse (SM), which is associated with poor treatment efficacy. Although literature indicates similar inhibitory control deficits in both conditions, it is unclear whether SM in ADHD exaggerates pre‐existing deficits, with additive or distinct impairments in patients. Our aim was to examine SM effects on inhibitory control in ADHD. Behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from a stop‐signal task were compared across ADHD patients with and without SM (ADHD + SM and ADHD‐only, respectively) and controls (n = 33/group; 79 males, mean age 18.02 ± 2.45). To limit substance use disorder (SUD) trait effects, groups were matched for parental SUD. Overall, we found worse performance for ADHD‐only and/or ADHD + SM compared with controls but no difference between the ADHD groups. Moreover, the ADHD groups showed decreased frontostriatal and frontoparietal activity during successful and failed stop trials. There were no differences between the ADHD groups in superior frontal nodes, but there was more decreased activation in temporal/parietal nodes in ADHD‐only compared with ADHD + SM. During go‐trials, ADHD + SM showed decreased activation in inferior frontal nodes compared with ADHD‐only and controls. Findings during response inhibition showed deficits in inhibition and attentional processes for ADHD patients with and without SM. Despite no evidence for SM effects during response inhibition, results during go‐trials suggest distinct effects on nodes that are associated with several executive functions. Future studies should investigate whether distinct deficits in ADHD + SM relate to poor treatment results and can direct development of distinct ADHD treatment strategies for these patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-07 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9285045/ /pubmed/34101312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adb.13063 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Addiction Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Paraskevopoulou, Maria
van Rooij, Daan
Schene, Aart H.
Chauvin, Roselyne
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Schellekens, Arnt F. A.
Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title_full Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title_fullStr Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title_full_unstemmed Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title_short Effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
title_sort effects of substance misuse on inhibitory control in patients with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adb.13063
work_keys_str_mv AT paraskevopouloumaria effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT vanrooijdaan effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT scheneaarth effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT chauvinroselyne effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT buitelaarjank effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT schellekensarntfa effectsofsubstancemisuseoninhibitorycontrolinpatientswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder