Cargando…

Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: Recently, thymectomy using minimally invasive approaches has been increasing with the development of robotic video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (R‐VATS). Although multimodal approach is effective for robot assisted thymectomy, it is necessary to determine the approach (left, right or s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jia‐Xin, Qian, Kai, Deng, Yi, Zheng, Yan‐Yan, Ou, Chun‐Mei, Liu, Jie, Jiang, Li‐Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2333
_version_ 1784747706726481920
author Xu, Jia‐Xin
Qian, Kai
Deng, Yi
Zheng, Yan‐Yan
Ou, Chun‐Mei
Liu, Jie
Jiang, Li‐Hong
author_facet Xu, Jia‐Xin
Qian, Kai
Deng, Yi
Zheng, Yan‐Yan
Ou, Chun‐Mei
Liu, Jie
Jiang, Li‐Hong
author_sort Xu, Jia‐Xin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, thymectomy using minimally invasive approaches has been increasing with the development of robotic video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (R‐VATS). Although multimodal approach is effective for robot assisted thymectomy, it is necessary to determine the approach (left, right or subxiphoid) associated with the least complications. METHODS: An electronic retrieval from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, GreyNet International and The Cochrane Library. The single‐arm meta‐analysis was performed to compare the rate of complications of right‐ and left‐side approaches by R‐VATS. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies including 930 patients were identified. The pooled incidence of total complications was 12.2% (confidence interval: 10.0%–14.8%) for all studies. The overall complication rate was 17.3% for the right‐side compared with 7.4% for the left side (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 2.484, 1.601–3.852). The pooled incidence of air leak was significantly higher for the right versus left side (5.1% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher for the right‐side compared with the left‐side approach (4% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The open conversion rate was significantly higher for the right versus the left‐side (6.5% vs. 2.9%, respectively; p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in the pooled incidence of pleural effusion and thoracic duct fistula when comparing the right‐ and left‐side approaches. In subgroup analysis, in the left approach, the incidence of overall complications (28.6% vs. 5.5%, respectively; p = 0.002) and pleural effusion (14.3% vs. 1%, respectively; p = 0.002) was higher for the ‘Old Age’ group compared with the ‘Youth’ group; However, In the subgroup analysis of gender, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications after thymectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be performed on the left‐ and right‐sides; however, complications are minimal with the left‐side approach. These data demonstrate that the incidence of overall complications, atrial fibrillation, open conversion ratios, and air leak rate of left‐side R‐VATS thymectomy are lower than those of right‐side. Further subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the older group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92850852022-07-15 Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review Xu, Jia‐Xin Qian, Kai Deng, Yi Zheng, Yan‐Yan Ou, Chun‐Mei Liu, Jie Jiang, Li‐Hong Int J Med Robot Review Articles BACKGROUND: Recently, thymectomy using minimally invasive approaches has been increasing with the development of robotic video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (R‐VATS). Although multimodal approach is effective for robot assisted thymectomy, it is necessary to determine the approach (left, right or subxiphoid) associated with the least complications. METHODS: An electronic retrieval from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, GreyNet International and The Cochrane Library. The single‐arm meta‐analysis was performed to compare the rate of complications of right‐ and left‐side approaches by R‐VATS. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies including 930 patients were identified. The pooled incidence of total complications was 12.2% (confidence interval: 10.0%–14.8%) for all studies. The overall complication rate was 17.3% for the right‐side compared with 7.4% for the left side (P < 0.001, odds ratio = 2.484, 1.601–3.852). The pooled incidence of air leak was significantly higher for the right versus left side (5.1% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The incidence of atrial fibrillation was higher for the right‐side compared with the left‐side approach (4% vs. 1.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). The open conversion rate was significantly higher for the right versus the left‐side (6.5% vs. 2.9%, respectively; p = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in the pooled incidence of pleural effusion and thoracic duct fistula when comparing the right‐ and left‐side approaches. In subgroup analysis, in the left approach, the incidence of overall complications (28.6% vs. 5.5%, respectively; p = 0.002) and pleural effusion (14.3% vs. 1%, respectively; p = 0.002) was higher for the ‘Old Age’ group compared with the ‘Youth’ group; However, In the subgroup analysis of gender, there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications after thymectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be performed on the left‐ and right‐sides; however, complications are minimal with the left‐side approach. These data demonstrate that the incidence of overall complications, atrial fibrillation, open conversion ratios, and air leak rate of left‐side R‐VATS thymectomy are lower than those of right‐side. Further subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the older group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-24 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9285085/ /pubmed/34533876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2333 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Xu, Jia‐Xin
Qian, Kai
Deng, Yi
Zheng, Yan‐Yan
Ou, Chun‐Mei
Liu, Jie
Jiang, Li‐Hong
Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_full Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_short Complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: A single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
title_sort complications of robot‐assisted thymectomy: a single‐arm meta‐analysis and systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2333
work_keys_str_mv AT xujiaxin complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT qiankai complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT dengyi complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT zhengyanyan complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT ouchunmei complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT liujie complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT jianglihong complicationsofrobotassistedthymectomyasinglearmmetaanalysisandsystematicreview