Cargando…

Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability

Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Abigail S. L., Woelmer, Whitney M., Wander, Heather L., Howard, Dexter W., Smith, John W., McClure, Ryan P., Lofton, Mary E., Hammond, Nicholas W., Corrigan, Rachel S., Thomas, R. Quinn, Carey, Cayelan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500
_version_ 1784747753366093824
author Lewis, Abigail S. L.
Woelmer, Whitney M.
Wander, Heather L.
Howard, Dexter W.
Smith, John W.
McClure, Ryan P.
Lofton, Mary E.
Hammond, Nicholas W.
Corrigan, Rachel S.
Thomas, R. Quinn
Carey, Cayelan C.
author_facet Lewis, Abigail S. L.
Woelmer, Whitney M.
Wander, Heather L.
Howard, Dexter W.
Smith, John W.
McClure, Ryan P.
Lofton, Mary E.
Hammond, Nicholas W.
Corrigan, Rachel S.
Thomas, R. Quinn
Carey, Cayelan C.
author_sort Lewis, Abigail S. L.
collection PubMed
description Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near‐term (≤10‐yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near‐term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near‐term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near‐term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1–7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92853362022-07-15 Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability Lewis, Abigail S. L. Woelmer, Whitney M. Wander, Heather L. Howard, Dexter W. Smith, John W. McClure, Ryan P. Lofton, Mary E. Hammond, Nicholas W. Corrigan, Rachel S. Thomas, R. Quinn Carey, Cayelan C. Ecol Appl Articles Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near‐term (≤10‐yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near‐term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near‐term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near‐term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1–7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9285336/ /pubmed/34800082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Lewis, Abigail S. L.
Woelmer, Whitney M.
Wander, Heather L.
Howard, Dexter W.
Smith, John W.
McClure, Ryan P.
Lofton, Mary E.
Hammond, Nicholas W.
Corrigan, Rachel S.
Thomas, R. Quinn
Carey, Cayelan C.
Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title_full Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title_fullStr Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title_full_unstemmed Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title_short Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
title_sort increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800082
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisabigailsl increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT woelmerwhitneym increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT wanderheatherl increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT howarddexterw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT smithjohnw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT mcclureryanp increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT loftonmarye increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT hammondnicholasw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT corriganrachels increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT thomasrquinn increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability
AT careycayelanc increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability