Cargando…
Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability
Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500 |
_version_ | 1784747753366093824 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Abigail S. L. Woelmer, Whitney M. Wander, Heather L. Howard, Dexter W. Smith, John W. McClure, Ryan P. Lofton, Mary E. Hammond, Nicholas W. Corrigan, Rachel S. Thomas, R. Quinn Carey, Cayelan C. |
author_facet | Lewis, Abigail S. L. Woelmer, Whitney M. Wander, Heather L. Howard, Dexter W. Smith, John W. McClure, Ryan P. Lofton, Mary E. Hammond, Nicholas W. Corrigan, Rachel S. Thomas, R. Quinn Carey, Cayelan C. |
author_sort | Lewis, Abigail S. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near‐term (≤10‐yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near‐term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near‐term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near‐term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1–7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92853362022-07-15 Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability Lewis, Abigail S. L. Woelmer, Whitney M. Wander, Heather L. Howard, Dexter W. Smith, John W. McClure, Ryan P. Lofton, Mary E. Hammond, Nicholas W. Corrigan, Rachel S. Thomas, R. Quinn Carey, Cayelan C. Ecol Appl Articles Near‐term iterative forecasting is a powerful tool for ecological decision support and has the potential to transform our understanding of ecological predictability. However, to this point, there has been no cross‐ecosystem analysis of near‐term ecological forecasts, making it difficult to synthesize diverse research efforts and prioritize future developments for this emerging field. In this study, we analyzed 178 near‐term (≤10‐yr forecast horizon) ecological forecasting papers to understand the development and current state of near‐term ecological forecasting literature and to compare forecast accuracy across scales and variables. Our results indicated that near‐term ecological forecasting is widespread and growing: forecasts have been produced for sites on all seven continents and the rate of forecast publication is increasing over time. As forecast production has accelerated, some best practices have been proposed and application of these best practices is increasing. In particular, data publication, forecast archiving, and workflow automation have all increased significantly over time. However, adoption of proposed best practices remains low overall: for example, despite the fact that uncertainty is often cited as an essential component of an ecological forecast, only 45% of papers included uncertainty in their forecast outputs. As the use of these proposed best practices increases, near‐term ecological forecasting has the potential to make significant contributions to our understanding of forecastability across scales and variables. In this study, we found that forecastability (defined here as realized forecast accuracy) decreased in predictable patterns over 1–7 d forecast horizons. Variables that were closely related (i.e., chlorophyll and phytoplankton) displayed very similar trends in forecastability, while more distantly related variables (i.e., pollen and evapotranspiration) exhibited significantly different patterns. Increasing use of proposed best practices in ecological forecasting will allow us to examine the forecastability of additional variables and timescales in the future, providing a robust analysis of the fundamental predictability of ecological variables. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9285336/ /pubmed/34800082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Articles Lewis, Abigail S. L. Woelmer, Whitney M. Wander, Heather L. Howard, Dexter W. Smith, John W. McClure, Ryan P. Lofton, Mary E. Hammond, Nicholas W. Corrigan, Rachel S. Thomas, R. Quinn Carey, Cayelan C. Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title | Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title_full | Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title_fullStr | Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title_short | Increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
title_sort | increased adoption of best practices in ecological forecasting enables comparisons of forecastability |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800082 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisabigailsl increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT woelmerwhitneym increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT wanderheatherl increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT howarddexterw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT smithjohnw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT mcclureryanp increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT loftonmarye increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT hammondnicholasw increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT corriganrachels increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT thomasrquinn increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability AT careycayelanc increasedadoptionofbestpracticesinecologicalforecastingenablescomparisonsofforecastability |