Cargando…

Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) with Cold EI is based on interfacing GC and MS with a supersonic molecular beam (SMB) and sample compounds ionization with a fly‐through ion source as vibrationally cold compounds in the SMB (hence the name Cold EI). We explored the use of nitrogen and hy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margolin Eren, Ksenia J., Prest, Harry Frank, Amirav, Aviv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35472728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.4830
_version_ 1784747754619142144
author Margolin Eren, Ksenia J.
Prest, Harry Frank
Amirav, Aviv
author_facet Margolin Eren, Ksenia J.
Prest, Harry Frank
Amirav, Aviv
author_sort Margolin Eren, Ksenia J.
collection PubMed
description Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) with Cold EI is based on interfacing GC and MS with a supersonic molecular beam (SMB) and sample compounds ionization with a fly‐through ion source as vibrationally cold compounds in the SMB (hence the name Cold EI). We explored the use of nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases with Cold EI and found: A. Nitrogen is very effective in cooling compounds in SMB and while helium requires 60 ml/min nitrogen provides effective cooling with only 7–8 ml/min combined column and make‐up flow rate. Hydrogen is less effective than helium and requires higher flow rates. B. The transition from helium to nitrogen (or hydrogen) is simple and fast and requires just closing the helium valve and opening the nitrogen valve. C. The same column used with helium can be used with nitrogen or hydrogen. D. The same elution times could be obtained with nitrogen or hydrogen as with helium. E. The GC separation with nitrogen was reduced compared with helium and peak widths were increased by an average factor of 1.5 for similar elution times. Hydrogen provided ~0.7 narrower peak widths than helium. F. The signal with nitrogen was reduced compared with helium by an average factor of 3.3 and the signal loss was reduced with higher compounds mass. With hydrogen the signal loss was about a factor of 1.5 but the baseline noise was higher thus with similar S/N as with nitrogen. G. USEPA 8270 semivolatile mixture was easily analyzed with both nitrogen and hydrogen carrier gases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92853412022-07-15 Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI Margolin Eren, Ksenia J. Prest, Harry Frank Amirav, Aviv J Mass Spectrom Research Articles Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) with Cold EI is based on interfacing GC and MS with a supersonic molecular beam (SMB) and sample compounds ionization with a fly‐through ion source as vibrationally cold compounds in the SMB (hence the name Cold EI). We explored the use of nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases with Cold EI and found: A. Nitrogen is very effective in cooling compounds in SMB and while helium requires 60 ml/min nitrogen provides effective cooling with only 7–8 ml/min combined column and make‐up flow rate. Hydrogen is less effective than helium and requires higher flow rates. B. The transition from helium to nitrogen (or hydrogen) is simple and fast and requires just closing the helium valve and opening the nitrogen valve. C. The same column used with helium can be used with nitrogen or hydrogen. D. The same elution times could be obtained with nitrogen or hydrogen as with helium. E. The GC separation with nitrogen was reduced compared with helium and peak widths were increased by an average factor of 1.5 for similar elution times. Hydrogen provided ~0.7 narrower peak widths than helium. F. The signal with nitrogen was reduced compared with helium by an average factor of 3.3 and the signal loss was reduced with higher compounds mass. With hydrogen the signal loss was about a factor of 1.5 but the baseline noise was higher thus with similar S/N as with nitrogen. G. USEPA 8270 semivolatile mixture was easily analyzed with both nitrogen and hydrogen carrier gases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-26 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9285341/ /pubmed/35472728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.4830 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Margolin Eren, Ksenia J.
Prest, Harry Frank
Amirav, Aviv
Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title_full Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title_fullStr Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title_full_unstemmed Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title_short Nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for GC‐MS with Cold EI
title_sort nitrogen and hydrogen as carrier and make‐up gases for gc‐ms with cold ei
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35472728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.4830
work_keys_str_mv AT margolinerenkseniaj nitrogenandhydrogenascarrierandmakeupgasesforgcmswithcoldei
AT prestharryfrank nitrogenandhydrogenascarrierandmakeupgasesforgcmswithcoldei
AT amiravaviv nitrogenandhydrogenascarrierandmakeupgasesforgcmswithcoldei