Cargando…

Use of letermovir‐valganciclovir combination as a step‐down treatment after foscarnet for ganciclovir‐resistant CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Letermovir (LTV) might be an alternative treatment to nephrotoxic foscarnet (FOS) in Ganciclovir (GCV) resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, its efficacy in controlling active CMV viremia is unclear, as it is only approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem‐cell tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rho, Elena, Näf, Bettina, Müller, Thomas F, Wüthrich, Rudolf P, Schachter, Thomas, von Moos, Seraina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34181768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14401
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Letermovir (LTV) might be an alternative treatment to nephrotoxic foscarnet (FOS) in Ganciclovir (GCV) resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, its efficacy in controlling active CMV viremia is unclear, as it is only approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation. METHODS: This case series describes 14 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with moderate‐level GCV resistant CMV infection, treated by different step‐down strategies after initial FOS therapy: (1) Observation without antiviral follow‐up or switch to valganciclovir (VGCV) (pre‐LTV era), and (2) Switch to LTV±VGCV (LTV era). RESULTS: One patient died under FOS. Thirteen patients were followed under step‐down regimens. All but two patients had ongoing CMV viremia when stopping FOS. In pre‐LTV era, 5/9 (56%) experienced a CMV breakthrough > 10 000 IU/ml calling for another course of FOS, as compared to 1/4 (25%) in the LTV era. Addition of VGCV to LTV at low‐level viral breakthrough, addressing a possible developing resistance against LTV, prevented viral surge in two patients. In the pre‐LTV era, CMV‐related death or graft loss occurred in three of nine (33%), compared to no death or graft loss in the LTV era. CONCLUSION: A step‐down strategy combining LTV+VGCV, might allow to safely stop FOS at ongoing low‐level viremia.