Cargando…

Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)

Earth system models are intended to make long‐term projections, but they can be evaluated at interannual and seasonal time scales. Although the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) showed improvements in a number of terrestrial carbon cycle benchmarks, relative to its predecessor, our analysis sugge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieder, William R., Butterfield, Zachary, Lindsay, Keith, Lombardozzi, Danica L., Keppel‐Aleks, Gretchen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007034
_version_ 1784747772393553920
author Wieder, William R.
Butterfield, Zachary
Lindsay, Keith
Lombardozzi, Danica L.
Keppel‐Aleks, Gretchen
author_facet Wieder, William R.
Butterfield, Zachary
Lindsay, Keith
Lombardozzi, Danica L.
Keppel‐Aleks, Gretchen
author_sort Wieder, William R.
collection PubMed
description Earth system models are intended to make long‐term projections, but they can be evaluated at interannual and seasonal time scales. Although the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) showed improvements in a number of terrestrial carbon cycle benchmarks, relative to its predecessor, our analysis suggests that the interannual variability (IAV) in net terrestrial carbon fluxes did not show similar improvements. The model simulated low IAV of net ecosystem production (NEP), resulting in a weaker than observed sensitivity of the carbon cycle to climate variability. Low IAV in net fluxes likely resulted from low variability in gross primary productivity (GPP)—especially in the tropics—and a high covariation between GPP and ecosystem respiration. Although lower than observed, the IAV of NEP had significant climate sensitivities, with positive NEP anomalies associated with warmer and drier conditions in high latitudes, and with wetter and cooler conditions in mid and low latitudes. We identified two dominant modes of seasonal variability in carbon cycle flux anomalies in our fully coupled CESM2 simulations that are characterized by seasonal amplification and redistribution of ecosystem fluxes. Seasonal amplification of net and gross carbon fluxes showed climate sensitivities mirroring those of annual fluxes. Seasonal redistribution of carbon fluxes is initiated by springtime temperature anomalies, but subsequently negative feedbacks in soil moisture during the summer and fall result in net annual carbon losses from land. These modes of variability are also seen in satellite proxies of GPP, suggesting that CESM2 appropriately represents regional sensitivities of photosynthesis to climate variability on seasonal time scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92854082022-07-18 Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) Wieder, William R. Butterfield, Zachary Lindsay, Keith Lombardozzi, Danica L. Keppel‐Aleks, Gretchen Global Biogeochem Cycles Research Article Earth system models are intended to make long‐term projections, but they can be evaluated at interannual and seasonal time scales. Although the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) showed improvements in a number of terrestrial carbon cycle benchmarks, relative to its predecessor, our analysis suggests that the interannual variability (IAV) in net terrestrial carbon fluxes did not show similar improvements. The model simulated low IAV of net ecosystem production (NEP), resulting in a weaker than observed sensitivity of the carbon cycle to climate variability. Low IAV in net fluxes likely resulted from low variability in gross primary productivity (GPP)—especially in the tropics—and a high covariation between GPP and ecosystem respiration. Although lower than observed, the IAV of NEP had significant climate sensitivities, with positive NEP anomalies associated with warmer and drier conditions in high latitudes, and with wetter and cooler conditions in mid and low latitudes. We identified two dominant modes of seasonal variability in carbon cycle flux anomalies in our fully coupled CESM2 simulations that are characterized by seasonal amplification and redistribution of ecosystem fluxes. Seasonal amplification of net and gross carbon fluxes showed climate sensitivities mirroring those of annual fluxes. Seasonal redistribution of carbon fluxes is initiated by springtime temperature anomalies, but subsequently negative feedbacks in soil moisture during the summer and fall result in net annual carbon losses from land. These modes of variability are also seen in satellite proxies of GPP, suggesting that CESM2 appropriately represents regional sensitivities of photosynthesis to climate variability on seasonal time scales. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-13 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9285408/ /pubmed/35860341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007034 Text en © 2021. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wieder, William R.
Butterfield, Zachary
Lindsay, Keith
Lombardozzi, Danica L.
Keppel‐Aleks, Gretchen
Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title_full Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title_fullStr Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title_full_unstemmed Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title_short Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
title_sort interannual and seasonal drivers of carbon cycle variability represented by the community earth system model (cesm2)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007034
work_keys_str_mv AT wiederwilliamr interannualandseasonaldriversofcarboncyclevariabilityrepresentedbythecommunityearthsystemmodelcesm2
AT butterfieldzachary interannualandseasonaldriversofcarboncyclevariabilityrepresentedbythecommunityearthsystemmodelcesm2
AT lindsaykeith interannualandseasonaldriversofcarboncyclevariabilityrepresentedbythecommunityearthsystemmodelcesm2
AT lombardozzidanical interannualandseasonaldriversofcarboncyclevariabilityrepresentedbythecommunityearthsystemmodelcesm2
AT keppelaleksgretchen interannualandseasonaldriversofcarboncyclevariabilityrepresentedbythecommunityearthsystemmodelcesm2