Cargando…

Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation

INTRODUCTION: The approach to thyroid hormone replacement varies across centres, but the extent and determinants of variation is unclear. We evaluated geographical variation in levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3) prescribing across General Practices in England and analysed the relationship of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stedman, Mike, Taylor, Peter, Premawardhana, Lakdasa, Okosieme, Onyebuchi, Dayan, Colin, Heald, Adrian H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14228
_version_ 1784747784428060672
author Stedman, Mike
Taylor, Peter
Premawardhana, Lakdasa
Okosieme, Onyebuchi
Dayan, Colin
Heald, Adrian H.
author_facet Stedman, Mike
Taylor, Peter
Premawardhana, Lakdasa
Okosieme, Onyebuchi
Dayan, Colin
Heald, Adrian H.
author_sort Stedman, Mike
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The approach to thyroid hormone replacement varies across centres, but the extent and determinants of variation is unclear. We evaluated geographical variation in levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3) prescribing across General Practices in England and analysed the relationship of prescribing patterns to clinical and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Data was downloaded from the NHS monthly General Practice Prescribing Data in England for the period 2011‐2020. RESULTS: The study covered a population of 19.4 million women over 30 years of age, attending 6,660 GP practices and being provided with 33.7 million prescriptions of LT4 and LT3 at a total cost of £90million/year. Overall, 0.5% of levothyroxine treated patients continue to receive liothyronine. All Clinical Commission Groups (CCGs) in England continue to have at least one liothyronine prescribing practice and 48.5% of English general practices prescribed liothyronine in 2019‐2020. Factors strongly influencing more levothyroxine prescribing (model accounted for 62% of variance) were the CCG to which the practice belonged and the proportion of people with diabetes registered on the practice list plus antidepressant prescribing, with socioeconomic disadvantage associated with less levothyroxine prescribing. Whereas factors that were associated with increased levels of liothyronine prescribing (model accounted for 17% of variance), were antidepressant prescribing and % of type 2 diabetes mellitus individuals achieving HbA1c control of 58 mmol/mol or less. Factors that were associated with reduced levels of liothyronine prescribing included smoking and higher obesity rates. CONCLUSION: In spite of strenuous attempts to limit prescribing of liothyronine in general practice a significant number of patients continue to receive this therapy, although there is significant geographical variation in the prescribing of this as for levothyroxine, with specific general practice and CCG‐related factors influencing prescribing of both levothyroxine and liothyronine across England.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92854552022-07-18 Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation Stedman, Mike Taylor, Peter Premawardhana, Lakdasa Okosieme, Onyebuchi Dayan, Colin Heald, Adrian H. Int J Clin Pract Original Papers INTRODUCTION: The approach to thyroid hormone replacement varies across centres, but the extent and determinants of variation is unclear. We evaluated geographical variation in levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3) prescribing across General Practices in England and analysed the relationship of prescribing patterns to clinical and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Data was downloaded from the NHS monthly General Practice Prescribing Data in England for the period 2011‐2020. RESULTS: The study covered a population of 19.4 million women over 30 years of age, attending 6,660 GP practices and being provided with 33.7 million prescriptions of LT4 and LT3 at a total cost of £90million/year. Overall, 0.5% of levothyroxine treated patients continue to receive liothyronine. All Clinical Commission Groups (CCGs) in England continue to have at least one liothyronine prescribing practice and 48.5% of English general practices prescribed liothyronine in 2019‐2020. Factors strongly influencing more levothyroxine prescribing (model accounted for 62% of variance) were the CCG to which the practice belonged and the proportion of people with diabetes registered on the practice list plus antidepressant prescribing, with socioeconomic disadvantage associated with less levothyroxine prescribing. Whereas factors that were associated with increased levels of liothyronine prescribing (model accounted for 17% of variance), were antidepressant prescribing and % of type 2 diabetes mellitus individuals achieving HbA1c control of 58 mmol/mol or less. Factors that were associated with reduced levels of liothyronine prescribing included smoking and higher obesity rates. CONCLUSION: In spite of strenuous attempts to limit prescribing of liothyronine in general practice a significant number of patients continue to receive this therapy, although there is significant geographical variation in the prescribing of this as for levothyroxine, with specific general practice and CCG‐related factors influencing prescribing of both levothyroxine and liothyronine across England. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-06 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9285455/ /pubmed/33864324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14228 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Stedman, Mike
Taylor, Peter
Premawardhana, Lakdasa
Okosieme, Onyebuchi
Dayan, Colin
Heald, Adrian H.
Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title_full Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title_fullStr Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title_short Liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in England: A comprehensive survey and evaluation
title_sort liothyronine and levothyroxine prescribing in england: a comprehensive survey and evaluation
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14228
work_keys_str_mv AT stedmanmike liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation
AT taylorpeter liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation
AT premawardhanalakdasa liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation
AT okosiemeonyebuchi liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation
AT dayancolin liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation
AT healdadrianh liothyronineandlevothyroxineprescribinginenglandacomprehensivesurveyandevaluation