Cargando…

Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German

At conceptual and linguistic levels of cognition, events are said to be represented in terms of abstract categories, for example, the sentence Jackie cut the bagel with a knife encodes the categories Agent (i.e., Jackie) and Patient (i.e., the bagel). In this paper, we ask whether entities such as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rissman, Lilia, van Putten, Saskia, Majid, Asifa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35523145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13140
_version_ 1784747842463596544
author Rissman, Lilia
van Putten, Saskia
Majid, Asifa
author_facet Rissman, Lilia
van Putten, Saskia
Majid, Asifa
author_sort Rissman, Lilia
collection PubMed
description At conceptual and linguistic levels of cognition, events are said to be represented in terms of abstract categories, for example, the sentence Jackie cut the bagel with a knife encodes the categories Agent (i.e., Jackie) and Patient (i.e., the bagel). In this paper, we ask whether entities such as the knife are also represented in terms of such a category (often labeled “Instrument”) and, if so, whether this category has a prototype structure. We hypothesized the Proto‐instrument is a tool: a physical object manipulated by an intentional agent to affect a change in another individual or object. To test this, we asked speakers of English, Dutch, and German to complete an event description task and a sentence acceptability judgment task in which events were viewed with more or less prototypical instruments. We found broad similarities in how English, Dutch, and German partition the semantic space of instrumental events, suggesting there is a shared concept of the Instrument category. However, there was no evidence to support the specific hypothesis that tools are the core of the Instrument category—instead, our results suggest the most prototypical Instrument is the direct extension of an intentional agent. This paper supports theoretical frameworks where thematic roles are analyzed in terms of prototypes and suggests new avenues of research on how instrumental category structure differs across linguistic and conceptual domains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92857102022-07-18 Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German Rissman, Lilia van Putten, Saskia Majid, Asifa Cogn Sci Regular Articles At conceptual and linguistic levels of cognition, events are said to be represented in terms of abstract categories, for example, the sentence Jackie cut the bagel with a knife encodes the categories Agent (i.e., Jackie) and Patient (i.e., the bagel). In this paper, we ask whether entities such as the knife are also represented in terms of such a category (often labeled “Instrument”) and, if so, whether this category has a prototype structure. We hypothesized the Proto‐instrument is a tool: a physical object manipulated by an intentional agent to affect a change in another individual or object. To test this, we asked speakers of English, Dutch, and German to complete an event description task and a sentence acceptability judgment task in which events were viewed with more or less prototypical instruments. We found broad similarities in how English, Dutch, and German partition the semantic space of instrumental events, suggesting there is a shared concept of the Instrument category. However, there was no evidence to support the specific hypothesis that tools are the core of the Instrument category—instead, our results suggest the most prototypical Instrument is the direct extension of an intentional agent. This paper supports theoretical frameworks where thematic roles are analyzed in terms of prototypes and suggests new avenues of research on how instrumental category structure differs across linguistic and conceptual domains. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-06 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9285710/ /pubmed/35523145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13140 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Regular Articles
Rissman, Lilia
van Putten, Saskia
Majid, Asifa
Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title_full Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title_fullStr Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title_short Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German
title_sort evidence for a shared instrument prototype from english, dutch, and german
topic Regular Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35523145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13140
work_keys_str_mv AT rissmanlilia evidenceforasharedinstrumentprototypefromenglishdutchandgerman
AT vanputtensaskia evidenceforasharedinstrumentprototypefromenglishdutchandgerman
AT majidasifa evidenceforasharedinstrumentprototypefromenglishdutchandgerman