Cargando…

Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes

Hyperspectral infrared sounding contains information about clouds, which plays an important role in modulating Earth's climate. However, there is a great deal of uncertainty in modeling the radiative effect of clouds due to its complex dependence on various parameters. Therefore, cloudy scenari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Tianhao, Natraj, Vijay, Braverman, Amy J., Yung, Yuk L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002245
_version_ 1784747851967889408
author Le, Tianhao
Natraj, Vijay
Braverman, Amy J.
Yung, Yuk L.
author_facet Le, Tianhao
Natraj, Vijay
Braverman, Amy J.
Yung, Yuk L.
author_sort Le, Tianhao
collection PubMed
description Hyperspectral infrared sounding contains information about clouds, which plays an important role in modulating Earth's climate. However, there is a great deal of uncertainty in modeling the radiative effect of clouds due to its complex dependence on various parameters. Therefore, cloudy scenarios are often neglected in retrievals of infrared spectral measurements and in data assimilation. One‐dimensional radiative transfer (RT) models have a limited capability to represent the cloud three‐dimensional multilayer structure. This issue is typically resolved by using a multiple independent column approach, which is computationally demanding. Therefore, it is necessary to find a balance between computational speed and accuracy for infrared RT all‐sky radiance simulations. In this study, we utilize the Community Radiative Transfer Model with four different cloud overlap schemes and compare against observations made by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) using a statistical metric called the first Wasserstein distance. Our results show that the average cloud overlap scheme performs the best and successfully predicts the overall probability distribution of brightness temperature over nonfrozen oceans for a wide range of wavelengths. The mean absolute differences are less than 0.7 K for 846 selected AIRS channels between 790 cm(−1) and 1231 cm(−1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92857482022-07-18 Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes Le, Tianhao Natraj, Vijay Braverman, Amy J. Yung, Yuk L. Earth Space Sci Research Article Hyperspectral infrared sounding contains information about clouds, which plays an important role in modulating Earth's climate. However, there is a great deal of uncertainty in modeling the radiative effect of clouds due to its complex dependence on various parameters. Therefore, cloudy scenarios are often neglected in retrievals of infrared spectral measurements and in data assimilation. One‐dimensional radiative transfer (RT) models have a limited capability to represent the cloud three‐dimensional multilayer structure. This issue is typically resolved by using a multiple independent column approach, which is computationally demanding. Therefore, it is necessary to find a balance between computational speed and accuracy for infrared RT all‐sky radiance simulations. In this study, we utilize the Community Radiative Transfer Model with four different cloud overlap schemes and compare against observations made by the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) using a statistical metric called the first Wasserstein distance. Our results show that the average cloud overlap scheme performs the best and successfully predicts the overall probability distribution of brightness temperature over nonfrozen oceans for a wide range of wavelengths. The mean absolute differences are less than 0.7 K for 846 selected AIRS channels between 790 cm(−1) and 1231 cm(−1). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9285748/ /pubmed/35859723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002245 Text en © 2022. The Authors. Earth and Space Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le, Tianhao
Natraj, Vijay
Braverman, Amy J.
Yung, Yuk L.
Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title_full Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title_fullStr Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title_short Evaluation of Modeled Hyperspectral Infrared Spectra Against All‐Sky AIRS Observations Using Different Cloud Overlap Schemes
title_sort evaluation of modeled hyperspectral infrared spectra against all‐sky airs observations using different cloud overlap schemes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35859723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002245
work_keys_str_mv AT letianhao evaluationofmodeledhyperspectralinfraredspectraagainstallskyairsobservationsusingdifferentcloudoverlapschemes
AT natrajvijay evaluationofmodeledhyperspectralinfraredspectraagainstallskyairsobservationsusingdifferentcloudoverlapschemes
AT bravermanamyj evaluationofmodeledhyperspectralinfraredspectraagainstallskyairsobservationsusingdifferentcloudoverlapschemes
AT yungyukl evaluationofmodeledhyperspectralinfraredspectraagainstallskyairsobservationsusingdifferentcloudoverlapschemes