Cargando…

An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations

The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fevola, Elisa, Ballarin, Francesco, Jiménez‐Juan, Laura, Fremes, Stephen, Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano, Rozza, Gianluigi, Triverio, Piero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516
_version_ 1784747852493225984
author Fevola, Elisa
Ballarin, Francesco
Jiménez‐Juan, Laura
Fremes, Stephen
Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano
Rozza, Gianluigi
Triverio, Piero
author_facet Fevola, Elisa
Ballarin, Francesco
Jiménez‐Juan, Laura
Fremes, Stephen
Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano
Rozza, Gianluigi
Triverio, Piero
author_sort Fevola, Elisa
collection PubMed
description The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WSS), which are of clinical interest. Devising automated procedures for the selection of boundary conditions is vital to achieve repeatable simulations. However, the most common techniques do not automatically assimilate patient‐specific data, relying instead on expensive and time‐consuming manual tuning procedures. In this work, we propose a technique for the automated estimation of outlet boundary conditions based on optimal control. The values of resistive boundary conditions are set as control variables and optimized to match available patient‐specific data. Experimental results on four aortic arches demonstrate that the proposed framework can assimilate 4D‐Flow MRI data more accurately than two other common techniques based on Murray's law and Ohm's law.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92857502022-07-18 An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations Fevola, Elisa Ballarin, Francesco Jiménez‐Juan, Laura Fremes, Stephen Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano Rozza, Gianluigi Triverio, Piero Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Research Article ‐ Applications The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WSS), which are of clinical interest. Devising automated procedures for the selection of boundary conditions is vital to achieve repeatable simulations. However, the most common techniques do not automatically assimilate patient‐specific data, relying instead on expensive and time‐consuming manual tuning procedures. In this work, we propose a technique for the automated estimation of outlet boundary conditions based on optimal control. The values of resistive boundary conditions are set as control variables and optimized to match available patient‐specific data. Experimental results on four aortic arches demonstrate that the proposed framework can assimilate 4D‐Flow MRI data more accurately than two other common techniques based on Murray's law and Ohm's law. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-15 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9285750/ /pubmed/34337877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article ‐ Applications
Fevola, Elisa
Ballarin, Francesco
Jiménez‐Juan, Laura
Fremes, Stephen
Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano
Rozza, Gianluigi
Triverio, Piero
An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title_full An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title_fullStr An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title_full_unstemmed An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title_short An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
title_sort optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
topic Research Article ‐ Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516
work_keys_str_mv AT fevolaelisa anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT ballarinfrancesco anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT jimenezjuanlaura anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT fremesstephen anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT grivettalociastefano anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT rozzagianluigi anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT triveriopiero anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT fevolaelisa optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT ballarinfrancesco optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT jimenezjuanlaura optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT fremesstephen optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT grivettalociastefano optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT rozzagianluigi optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations
AT triveriopiero optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations