Cargando…
An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations
The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516 |
_version_ | 1784747852493225984 |
---|---|
author | Fevola, Elisa Ballarin, Francesco Jiménez‐Juan, Laura Fremes, Stephen Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano Rozza, Gianluigi Triverio, Piero |
author_facet | Fevola, Elisa Ballarin, Francesco Jiménez‐Juan, Laura Fremes, Stephen Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano Rozza, Gianluigi Triverio, Piero |
author_sort | Fevola, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WSS), which are of clinical interest. Devising automated procedures for the selection of boundary conditions is vital to achieve repeatable simulations. However, the most common techniques do not automatically assimilate patient‐specific data, relying instead on expensive and time‐consuming manual tuning procedures. In this work, we propose a technique for the automated estimation of outlet boundary conditions based on optimal control. The values of resistive boundary conditions are set as control variables and optimized to match available patient‐specific data. Experimental results on four aortic arches demonstrate that the proposed framework can assimilate 4D‐Flow MRI data more accurately than two other common techniques based on Murray's law and Ohm's law. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92857502022-07-18 An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations Fevola, Elisa Ballarin, Francesco Jiménez‐Juan, Laura Fremes, Stephen Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano Rozza, Gianluigi Triverio, Piero Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Research Article ‐ Applications The choice of appropriate boundary conditions is a fundamental step in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of the cardiovascular system. Boundary conditions, in fact, highly affect the computed pressure and flow rates, and consequently haemodynamic indicators such as wall shear stress (WSS), which are of clinical interest. Devising automated procedures for the selection of boundary conditions is vital to achieve repeatable simulations. However, the most common techniques do not automatically assimilate patient‐specific data, relying instead on expensive and time‐consuming manual tuning procedures. In this work, we propose a technique for the automated estimation of outlet boundary conditions based on optimal control. The values of resistive boundary conditions are set as control variables and optimized to match available patient‐specific data. Experimental results on four aortic arches demonstrate that the proposed framework can assimilate 4D‐Flow MRI data more accurately than two other common techniques based on Murray's law and Ohm's law. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-15 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9285750/ /pubmed/34337877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article ‐ Applications Fevola, Elisa Ballarin, Francesco Jiménez‐Juan, Laura Fremes, Stephen Grivet‐Talocia, Stefano Rozza, Gianluigi Triverio, Piero An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title | An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title_full | An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title_fullStr | An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title_short | An optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
title_sort | optimal control approach to determine resistance‐type boundary conditions from in‐vivo data for cardiovascular simulations |
topic | Research Article ‐ Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3516 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fevolaelisa anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT ballarinfrancesco anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT jimenezjuanlaura anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT fremesstephen anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT grivettalociastefano anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT rozzagianluigi anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT triveriopiero anoptimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT fevolaelisa optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT ballarinfrancesco optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT jimenezjuanlaura optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT fremesstephen optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT grivettalociastefano optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT rozzagianluigi optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations AT triveriopiero optimalcontrolapproachtodetermineresistancetypeboundaryconditionsfrominvivodataforcardiovascularsimulations |