Cargando…

Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the factors that affect patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. METHODS: Patients with stroke were included in the study if they had no severe impairment in motor and cognitive functions. Dose of massed practice, motor function, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sabo, Bishir, Abdullahi, Auwal, Badaru, Umaru Muhammad, Saeys, Wim, Truijen, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0228
_version_ 1784747855959818240
author Sabo, Bishir
Abdullahi, Auwal
Badaru, Umaru Muhammad
Saeys, Wim
Truijen, Steven
author_facet Sabo, Bishir
Abdullahi, Auwal
Badaru, Umaru Muhammad
Saeys, Wim
Truijen, Steven
author_sort Sabo, Bishir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the factors that affect patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. METHODS: Patients with stroke were included in the study if they had no severe impairment in motor and cognitive functions. Dose of massed practice, motor function, perceived amount and quality of use of the arm in the real world, wrist and elbow flexors spasticity, dominant hand stroke, presence of shoulder pain, and central post-stroke pain were assessed on the first day. Dose of massed practice was assessed again on the second day. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear multiple regression. RESULTS: Only motor function (β = –0.310, r = 0.787, P < 0.001), perceived amount of use (β = 0.300, r = 0.823; 95% CI = 0.34–107.224, P = 0.049), severity of shoulder pain (β = –0.155, r = –0.472, P = 0.019), wrist flexors spasticity (β = –0.154, r = –0.421, P = 0.002), age (β = –0.129, r = –0.366, P = 0.018), dominant hand stroke (β = –0.091, r = –0.075, P = 0.041), and sex (β = –0.090, r = –0.161, P = 0.036) significantly influenced patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. CONCLUSION: Many factors affect patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. Understanding these factors can help in designing appropriate rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92857652022-07-27 Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke Sabo, Bishir Abdullahi, Auwal Badaru, Umaru Muhammad Saeys, Wim Truijen, Steven Transl Neurosci Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the factors that affect patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. METHODS: Patients with stroke were included in the study if they had no severe impairment in motor and cognitive functions. Dose of massed practice, motor function, perceived amount and quality of use of the arm in the real world, wrist and elbow flexors spasticity, dominant hand stroke, presence of shoulder pain, and central post-stroke pain were assessed on the first day. Dose of massed practice was assessed again on the second day. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear multiple regression. RESULTS: Only motor function (β = –0.310, r = 0.787, P < 0.001), perceived amount of use (β = 0.300, r = 0.823; 95% CI = 0.34–107.224, P = 0.049), severity of shoulder pain (β = –0.155, r = –0.472, P = 0.019), wrist flexors spasticity (β = –0.154, r = –0.421, P = 0.002), age (β = –0.129, r = –0.366, P = 0.018), dominant hand stroke (β = –0.091, r = –0.075, P = 0.041), and sex (β = –0.090, r = –0.161, P = 0.036) significantly influenced patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. CONCLUSION: Many factors affect patients’ ability to carry out high dose of massed practice. Understanding these factors can help in designing appropriate rehabilitation. De Gruyter 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9285765/ /pubmed/35903752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0228 Text en © 2022 Bishir Sabo et al., published by De Gruyter https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sabo, Bishir
Abdullahi, Auwal
Badaru, Umaru Muhammad
Saeys, Wim
Truijen, Steven
Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title_full Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title_fullStr Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title_short Predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
title_sort predictors of high dose of massed practice following stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35903752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2022-0228
work_keys_str_mv AT sabobishir predictorsofhighdoseofmassedpracticefollowingstroke
AT abdullahiauwal predictorsofhighdoseofmassedpracticefollowingstroke
AT badaruumarumuhammad predictorsofhighdoseofmassedpracticefollowingstroke
AT saeyswim predictorsofhighdoseofmassedpracticefollowingstroke
AT truijensteven predictorsofhighdoseofmassedpracticefollowingstroke