Cargando…
Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study
IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and ri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15214 |
_version_ | 1784747871024709632 |
---|---|
author | Ruggiero, Angelo Fabbrocini, Gabriella Cinelli, Eleonora Megna, Matteo |
author_facet | Ruggiero, Angelo Fabbrocini, Gabriella Cinelli, Eleonora Megna, Matteo |
author_sort | Ruggiero, Angelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92858262022-07-19 Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study Ruggiero, Angelo Fabbrocini, Gabriella Cinelli, Eleonora Megna, Matteo Dermatol Ther Original Articles IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-11-30 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9285826/ /pubmed/34800070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15214 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Dermatologic Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ruggiero, Angelo Fabbrocini, Gabriella Cinelli, Eleonora Megna, Matteo Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title | Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title_full | Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title_short | Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study |
title_sort | real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: results from an italian retrospective study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.15214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruggieroangelo realworldpracticeindirectcomparisonbetweenguselkumabandrisankizumabresultsfromanitalianretrospectivestudy AT fabbrocinigabriella realworldpracticeindirectcomparisonbetweenguselkumabandrisankizumabresultsfromanitalianretrospectivestudy AT cinellieleonora realworldpracticeindirectcomparisonbetweenguselkumabandrisankizumabresultsfromanitalianretrospectivestudy AT megnamatteo realworldpracticeindirectcomparisonbetweenguselkumabandrisankizumabresultsfromanitalianretrospectivestudy |