Cargando…
The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight
AIM: A force of 400 g at 2700 revolutions per minute (RPM) results in an optimum leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Most of centrifuges with varying characteristics generate a g-force in excess of 700 g at 2700 RPM. In this context, the study explores the effect of the original centrifugati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846586 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_830_20 |
_version_ | 1784747872307118080 |
---|---|
author | Sneha, Kidambi Rani, Ajmera Jhansi Chandra, Rampalli Viswa Kumar, Sandhya Pavan Jannu, Rajeev Naren Muppirala, Srikar |
author_facet | Sneha, Kidambi Rani, Ajmera Jhansi Chandra, Rampalli Viswa Kumar, Sandhya Pavan Jannu, Rajeev Naren Muppirala, Srikar |
author_sort | Sneha, Kidambi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: A force of 400 g at 2700 revolutions per minute (RPM) results in an optimum leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Most of centrifuges with varying characteristics generate a g-force in excess of 700 g at 2700 RPM. In this context, the study explores the effect of the original centrifugation protocol and a modified protocol tailor-made to lower the RPM to generate a g-force of ~ 400 g on platelet concentration, clot size and growth factors release in L-PRF prepared in two different commercially available centrifuges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty five subjects each were assigned to the following groups; R(1) and R(2) where L-PRF was obtained from two laboratory swing-out centrifuges (Remi 8C(®) and Remi C854(®), Mumbai, India), respectively. PRF was obtained from each subject within a group using two protocols; Original (O) protocol: conforming to the original centrifugation cycle (2700 RPM for 12 min) and Modified (M) protocol. Clot size, growth factor estimation, and platelet counts were measured at 20, 40, and 60 min from all the L-PRF clots, respectively. RESULTS: At the third time period (40–60 min), there were no significant differences in clot sizes with the original protocol (P = 0.09), but a highly significant difference was noticed with the modified protocol in both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). Our results showed an increased concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor with modified protocol than with original protocol with both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). By the end of second and third time periods, more platelet concentration was observed with modified protocol than with the original protocol in both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study infers that the centrifuge type and relative centrifugal force can affect the quality and quantity of cells and growth factors and an optimum relationship between g-force and RPM should be maintained to obtain L-PRF with adequate cell viability and optimum growth factor release. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92858312022-07-16 The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight Sneha, Kidambi Rani, Ajmera Jhansi Chandra, Rampalli Viswa Kumar, Sandhya Pavan Jannu, Rajeev Naren Muppirala, Srikar Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: A force of 400 g at 2700 revolutions per minute (RPM) results in an optimum leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Most of centrifuges with varying characteristics generate a g-force in excess of 700 g at 2700 RPM. In this context, the study explores the effect of the original centrifugation protocol and a modified protocol tailor-made to lower the RPM to generate a g-force of ~ 400 g on platelet concentration, clot size and growth factors release in L-PRF prepared in two different commercially available centrifuges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty five subjects each were assigned to the following groups; R(1) and R(2) where L-PRF was obtained from two laboratory swing-out centrifuges (Remi 8C(®) and Remi C854(®), Mumbai, India), respectively. PRF was obtained from each subject within a group using two protocols; Original (O) protocol: conforming to the original centrifugation cycle (2700 RPM for 12 min) and Modified (M) protocol. Clot size, growth factor estimation, and platelet counts were measured at 20, 40, and 60 min from all the L-PRF clots, respectively. RESULTS: At the third time period (40–60 min), there were no significant differences in clot sizes with the original protocol (P = 0.09), but a highly significant difference was noticed with the modified protocol in both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). Our results showed an increased concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor with modified protocol than with original protocol with both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). By the end of second and third time periods, more platelet concentration was observed with modified protocol than with the original protocol in both the centrifuges (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study infers that the centrifuge type and relative centrifugal force can affect the quality and quantity of cells and growth factors and an optimum relationship between g-force and RPM should be maintained to obtain L-PRF with adequate cell viability and optimum growth factor release. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9285831/ /pubmed/35846586 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_830_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sneha, Kidambi Rani, Ajmera Jhansi Chandra, Rampalli Viswa Kumar, Sandhya Pavan Jannu, Rajeev Naren Muppirala, Srikar The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title | The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title_full | The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title_fullStr | The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title_full_unstemmed | The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title_short | The G-Force Conundrum in Platelet-Rich Fibrin Generation: Management of a Problem Hidden in Plain Sight |
title_sort | g-force conundrum in platelet-rich fibrin generation: management of a problem hidden in plain sight |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846586 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_830_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snehakidambi thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT raniajmerajhansi thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT chandrarampalliviswa thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT kumarsandhyapavan thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT jannurajeevnaren thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT muppiralasrikar thegforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT snehakidambi gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT raniajmerajhansi gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT chandrarampalliviswa gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT kumarsandhyapavan gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT jannurajeevnaren gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight AT muppiralasrikar gforceconundruminplateletrichfibringenerationmanagementofaproblemhiddeninplainsight |