Cargando…
Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing
AIM: The present study was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy of scaling and root planing (SRP) alone and commercially available chlosite gel adjunctive to SRP in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 416 sites selected from 26 patients presenting with...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846587 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_121_20 |
_version_ | 1784747874862497792 |
---|---|
author | Verma, Neelu Saimbi, Charanjit Singh Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Avadhesh Tripathi, Amitandra Kumar |
author_facet | Verma, Neelu Saimbi, Charanjit Singh Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Avadhesh Tripathi, Amitandra Kumar |
author_sort | Verma, Neelu |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The present study was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy of scaling and root planing (SRP) alone and commercially available chlosite gel adjunctive to SRP in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 416 sites selected from 26 patients presenting with chronic periodontitis (age group ≥30 years) of both sexes, with pocket depth of ≥6 mm were recruited for the study. A split-mouth design was employed with one site receiving SRP alone (Group I) and the other receiving SRP followed by placement of commercially available chlosite gel (Group II) and all the clinical parameters-Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Probing Pocket depth and Clinical attachment loss (CAL) were recorded at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that significant reduction in PI and GI scores were observed in both groups till the end of the study period (6 months). Probing depth and CAL also showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, Group II (sites which received SRP + Chlosite gel) showed greater improvements in all of these parameters compared to Group I (sites which received SRP only). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the locally delivered commercially available chlosite gel along with mechanical debridement, resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in all the clinical parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9285841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92858412022-07-16 Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing Verma, Neelu Saimbi, Charanjit Singh Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Avadhesh Tripathi, Amitandra Kumar Contemp Clin Dent Original Article AIM: The present study was carried out to evaluate the clinical efficacy of scaling and root planing (SRP) alone and commercially available chlosite gel adjunctive to SRP in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 416 sites selected from 26 patients presenting with chronic periodontitis (age group ≥30 years) of both sexes, with pocket depth of ≥6 mm were recruited for the study. A split-mouth design was employed with one site receiving SRP alone (Group I) and the other receiving SRP followed by placement of commercially available chlosite gel (Group II) and all the clinical parameters-Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Probing Pocket depth and Clinical attachment loss (CAL) were recorded at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Results demonstrated that significant reduction in PI and GI scores were observed in both groups till the end of the study period (6 months). Probing depth and CAL also showed significant improvement in both the groups. However, Group II (sites which received SRP + Chlosite gel) showed greater improvements in all of these parameters compared to Group I (sites which received SRP only). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the locally delivered commercially available chlosite gel along with mechanical debridement, resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in all the clinical parameters. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9285841/ /pubmed/35846587 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_121_20 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Verma, Neelu Saimbi, Charanjit Singh Gupta, Sanjay Kumar, Avadhesh Tripathi, Amitandra Kumar Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title | Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title_full | Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title_fullStr | Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title_full_unstemmed | Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title_short | Compare the Efficacy of Chlosite Gel as an Adjunctive Therapy after Scaling and Root Planing |
title_sort | compare the efficacy of chlosite gel as an adjunctive therapy after scaling and root planing |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35846587 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_121_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermaneelu comparetheefficacyofchlositegelasanadjunctivetherapyafterscalingandrootplaning AT saimbicharanjitsingh comparetheefficacyofchlositegelasanadjunctivetherapyafterscalingandrootplaning AT guptasanjay comparetheefficacyofchlositegelasanadjunctivetherapyafterscalingandrootplaning AT kumaravadhesh comparetheefficacyofchlositegelasanadjunctivetherapyafterscalingandrootplaning AT tripathiamitandrakumar comparetheefficacyofchlositegelasanadjunctivetherapyafterscalingandrootplaning |