Cargando…

Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes

Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly important in seismology and earthquake science. Lab‐based studies have used acoustic emission data to predict time‐to‐failure and stress state, and in a few cases, the same approach has been used for field data. However, the underlying physic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shreedharan, Srisharan, Bolton, David Chas, Rivière, Jacques, Marone, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021588
_version_ 1784747890991693824
author Shreedharan, Srisharan
Bolton, David Chas
Rivière, Jacques
Marone, Chris
author_facet Shreedharan, Srisharan
Bolton, David Chas
Rivière, Jacques
Marone, Chris
author_sort Shreedharan, Srisharan
collection PubMed
description Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly important in seismology and earthquake science. Lab‐based studies have used acoustic emission data to predict time‐to‐failure and stress state, and in a few cases, the same approach has been used for field data. However, the underlying physical mechanisms that allow lab earthquake prediction and seismic forecasting remain poorly resolved. Here, we address this knowledge gap by coupling active‐source seismic data, which probe asperity‐scale processes, with ML methods. We show that elastic waves passing through the lab fault zone contain information that can predict the full spectrum of labquakes from slow slip instabilities to highly aperiodic events. The ML methods utilize systematic changes in P‐wave amplitude and velocity to accurately predict the timing and shear stress during labquakes. The ML predictions improve in accuracy closer to fault failure, demonstrating that the predictive power of the ultrasonic signals improves as the fault approaches failure. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between the ultrasonic parameters and fault slip rate, and in turn, the systematically evolving real area of contact and asperity stiffness allow the gradient boosting algorithm to “learn” about the state of the fault and its proximity to failure. Broadly, our results demonstrate the utility of physics‐informed ML in forecasting the imminence of fault slip at the laboratory scale, which may have important implications for earthquake mechanics in nature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92859152022-07-19 Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes Shreedharan, Srisharan Bolton, David Chas Rivière, Jacques Marone, Chris J Geophys Res Solid Earth Research Article Machine learning (ML) techniques have become increasingly important in seismology and earthquake science. Lab‐based studies have used acoustic emission data to predict time‐to‐failure and stress state, and in a few cases, the same approach has been used for field data. However, the underlying physical mechanisms that allow lab earthquake prediction and seismic forecasting remain poorly resolved. Here, we address this knowledge gap by coupling active‐source seismic data, which probe asperity‐scale processes, with ML methods. We show that elastic waves passing through the lab fault zone contain information that can predict the full spectrum of labquakes from slow slip instabilities to highly aperiodic events. The ML methods utilize systematic changes in P‐wave amplitude and velocity to accurately predict the timing and shear stress during labquakes. The ML predictions improve in accuracy closer to fault failure, demonstrating that the predictive power of the ultrasonic signals improves as the fault approaches failure. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between the ultrasonic parameters and fault slip rate, and in turn, the systematically evolving real area of contact and asperity stiffness allow the gradient boosting algorithm to “learn” about the state of the fault and its proximity to failure. Broadly, our results demonstrate the utility of physics‐informed ML in forecasting the imminence of fault slip at the laboratory scale, which may have important implications for earthquake mechanics in nature. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-19 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9285915/ /pubmed/35865235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021588 Text en © 2021. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shreedharan, Srisharan
Bolton, David Chas
Rivière, Jacques
Marone, Chris
Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title_full Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title_fullStr Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title_short Machine Learning Predicts the Timing and Shear Stress Evolution of Lab Earthquakes Using Active Seismic Monitoring of Fault Zone Processes
title_sort machine learning predicts the timing and shear stress evolution of lab earthquakes using active seismic monitoring of fault zone processes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021588
work_keys_str_mv AT shreedharansrisharan machinelearningpredictsthetimingandshearstressevolutionoflabearthquakesusingactiveseismicmonitoringoffaultzoneprocesses
AT boltondavidchas machinelearningpredictsthetimingandshearstressevolutionoflabearthquakesusingactiveseismicmonitoringoffaultzoneprocesses
AT rivierejacques machinelearningpredictsthetimingandshearstressevolutionoflabearthquakesusingactiveseismicmonitoringoffaultzoneprocesses
AT maronechris machinelearningpredictsthetimingandshearstressevolutionoflabearthquakesusingactiveseismicmonitoringoffaultzoneprocesses