Cargando…

Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals

OBJECTIVE: Follow‐up after breast cancer can be divided into surveillance and aftercare. It remains unclear how follow‐up can ideally be organised from the perspective of health care professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study was to gain insight in the organisation of follow‐up in seven Dutch teach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ankersmid, Jet W., van Hoeve, Jolanda C., Strobbe, Luc J. A., van Riet, Yvonne E. A., van Uden‐Kraan, Cornelia F., Siesling, Sabine, Drossaert, Constance H. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13505
_version_ 1784747902908760064
author Ankersmid, Jet W.
van Hoeve, Jolanda C.
Strobbe, Luc J. A.
van Riet, Yvonne E. A.
van Uden‐Kraan, Cornelia F.
Siesling, Sabine
Drossaert, Constance H. C.
author_facet Ankersmid, Jet W.
van Hoeve, Jolanda C.
Strobbe, Luc J. A.
van Riet, Yvonne E. A.
van Uden‐Kraan, Cornelia F.
Siesling, Sabine
Drossaert, Constance H. C.
author_sort Ankersmid, Jet W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Follow‐up after breast cancer can be divided into surveillance and aftercare. It remains unclear how follow‐up can ideally be organised from the perspective of health care professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study was to gain insight in the organisation of follow‐up in seven Dutch teaching hospitals and to identify best practices and opportunities for improvement of breast cancer (all stages) follow‐up as proposed by HCPs. METHODS: Semi‐structured in‐depth group interviews were performed, one in each of the participating hospitals, with in total 16 HCPs and 2 patient advocates. To describe the organisation of follow‐up, transcripts were analysed using a deductive approach. Best practices and opportunities were derived using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Variation was found in the organisation of aftercare, especially in timing, frequency, and disciplines of involved HCPs. Less variation was observed for surveillance, which was guided by the national guideline. Best practices focused on case management and adequate collaboration between HCPs of different disciplines. Mentioned opportunities were improving the structured monitoring of patients' needs and a comprehensive guideline for organisation and content of aftercare. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in follow‐up existed between hospitals. Shared decision‐making (SDM) about surveillance is desirable to ensure that surveillance matches the patient needs, preferences, and personal risk for recurrences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9285965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92859652022-07-19 Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals Ankersmid, Jet W. van Hoeve, Jolanda C. Strobbe, Luc J. A. van Riet, Yvonne E. A. van Uden‐Kraan, Cornelia F. Siesling, Sabine Drossaert, Constance H. C. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Follow‐up after breast cancer can be divided into surveillance and aftercare. It remains unclear how follow‐up can ideally be organised from the perspective of health care professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study was to gain insight in the organisation of follow‐up in seven Dutch teaching hospitals and to identify best practices and opportunities for improvement of breast cancer (all stages) follow‐up as proposed by HCPs. METHODS: Semi‐structured in‐depth group interviews were performed, one in each of the participating hospitals, with in total 16 HCPs and 2 patient advocates. To describe the organisation of follow‐up, transcripts were analysed using a deductive approach. Best practices and opportunities were derived using an inductive approach. RESULTS: Variation was found in the organisation of aftercare, especially in timing, frequency, and disciplines of involved HCPs. Less variation was observed for surveillance, which was guided by the national guideline. Best practices focused on case management and adequate collaboration between HCPs of different disciplines. Mentioned opportunities were improving the structured monitoring of patients' needs and a comprehensive guideline for organisation and content of aftercare. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in follow‐up existed between hospitals. Shared decision‐making (SDM) about surveillance is desirable to ensure that surveillance matches the patient needs, preferences, and personal risk for recurrences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-27 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9285965/ /pubmed/34449103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13505 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ankersmid, Jet W.
van Hoeve, Jolanda C.
Strobbe, Luc J. A.
van Riet, Yvonne E. A.
van Uden‐Kraan, Cornelia F.
Siesling, Sabine
Drossaert, Constance H. C.
Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title_full Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title_fullStr Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title_full_unstemmed Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title_short Follow‐up after breast cancer: Variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
title_sort follow‐up after breast cancer: variations, best practices, and opportunities for improvement according to health care professionals
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9285965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34449103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13505
work_keys_str_mv AT ankersmidjetw followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT vanhoevejolandac followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT strobbelucja followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT vanrietyvonneea followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT vanudenkraancorneliaf followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT sieslingsabine followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT drossaertconstancehc followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals
AT followupafterbreastcancervariationsbestpracticesandopportunitiesforimprovementaccordingtohealthcareprofessionals