Cargando…

Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks

Climatic, landscape, and host features are critical components in shaping outbreaks of vector‐borne diseases. However, the relationship between the outbreaks of vector‐borne pathogens and their environmental drivers is typically complicated, nonlinear, and may vary by taxonomic units below the speci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhamis, Moh A., Fountain‐Jones, Nicholas M., Aguilar‐Vega, Cecilia, Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, José M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2407
_version_ 1784747924074266624
author Alkhamis, Moh A.
Fountain‐Jones, Nicholas M.
Aguilar‐Vega, Cecilia
Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, José M.
author_facet Alkhamis, Moh A.
Fountain‐Jones, Nicholas M.
Aguilar‐Vega, Cecilia
Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, José M.
author_sort Alkhamis, Moh A.
collection PubMed
description Climatic, landscape, and host features are critical components in shaping outbreaks of vector‐borne diseases. However, the relationship between the outbreaks of vector‐borne pathogens and their environmental drivers is typically complicated, nonlinear, and may vary by taxonomic units below the species level (e.g., strain or serotype). Here, we aim to untangle how these complex forces shape the risk of outbreaks of Bluetongue virus (BTV); a vector‐borne pathogen that is continuously emerging and re‐emerging across Europe, with severe economic implications. We tested if the ecological predictors of BTV outbreak risk were serotype‐specific by examining the most prevalent serotypes recorded in Europe (1, 4, and 8). We used a robust machine learning (ML) pipeline and 23 relevant environmental features to fit predictive models to 24,245 outbreaks reported in 25 European countries between 2000 and 2019. Our ML models demonstrated high predictive performance for all BTV serotypes (accuracies > 0.87) and revealed strong nonlinear relationships between BTV outbreak risk and environmental and host features. Serotype‐specific analysis suggests, however, that each of the major serotypes (1, 4, and 8) had a unique outbreak risk profile. For example, temperature and midge abundance were as the most important characteristics shaping serotype 1, whereas for serotype 4 goat density and temperature were more important. We were also able to identify strong interactive effects between environmental and host characteristics that were also serotype specific. Our ML pipeline was able to reveal more in‐depth insights into the complex epidemiology of BTVs and can guide policymakers in intervention strategies to help reduce the economic implications and social cost of this important pathogen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9286057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92860572022-07-19 Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks Alkhamis, Moh A. Fountain‐Jones, Nicholas M. Aguilar‐Vega, Cecilia Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, José M. Ecol Appl Articles Climatic, landscape, and host features are critical components in shaping outbreaks of vector‐borne diseases. However, the relationship between the outbreaks of vector‐borne pathogens and their environmental drivers is typically complicated, nonlinear, and may vary by taxonomic units below the species level (e.g., strain or serotype). Here, we aim to untangle how these complex forces shape the risk of outbreaks of Bluetongue virus (BTV); a vector‐borne pathogen that is continuously emerging and re‐emerging across Europe, with severe economic implications. We tested if the ecological predictors of BTV outbreak risk were serotype‐specific by examining the most prevalent serotypes recorded in Europe (1, 4, and 8). We used a robust machine learning (ML) pipeline and 23 relevant environmental features to fit predictive models to 24,245 outbreaks reported in 25 European countries between 2000 and 2019. Our ML models demonstrated high predictive performance for all BTV serotypes (accuracies > 0.87) and revealed strong nonlinear relationships between BTV outbreak risk and environmental and host features. Serotype‐specific analysis suggests, however, that each of the major serotypes (1, 4, and 8) had a unique outbreak risk profile. For example, temperature and midge abundance were as the most important characteristics shaping serotype 1, whereas for serotype 4 goat density and temperature were more important. We were also able to identify strong interactive effects between environmental and host characteristics that were also serotype specific. Our ML pipeline was able to reveal more in‐depth insights into the complex epidemiology of BTVs and can guide policymakers in intervention strategies to help reduce the economic implications and social cost of this important pathogen. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-23 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9286057/ /pubmed/34245639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2407 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Alkhamis, Moh A.
Fountain‐Jones, Nicholas M.
Aguilar‐Vega, Cecilia
Sánchez‐Vizcaíno, José M.
Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title_full Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title_fullStr Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title_full_unstemmed Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title_short Environment, vector, or host? Using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
title_sort environment, vector, or host? using machine learning to untangle the mechanisms driving arbovirus outbreaks
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34245639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2407
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhamismoha environmentvectororhostusingmachinelearningtountanglethemechanismsdrivingarbovirusoutbreaks
AT fountainjonesnicholasm environmentvectororhostusingmachinelearningtountanglethemechanismsdrivingarbovirusoutbreaks
AT aguilarvegacecilia environmentvectororhostusingmachinelearningtountanglethemechanismsdrivingarbovirusoutbreaks
AT sanchezvizcainojosem environmentvectororhostusingmachinelearningtountanglethemechanismsdrivingarbovirusoutbreaks